- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: If you possess a bump stock after March 2019, you will be breaking the law.
Posted on 12/18/18 at 6:56 pm to GetCocky11
Posted on 12/18/18 at 6:56 pm to GetCocky11
I say frick 'em.
They have their rules and I have mine.
They have their rules and I have mine.
0
Posted on 12/18/18 at 7:02 pm to ChatRabbit77
quote:
Lmao, it's hilarious seeing people defend this because Trump wanted it. If Obama did this, you all would be flipping your shite.
I wouldn't
I have no problem with the ban of bump stocks. They are made for no other reason than to make your semi-auto fire as fast as a full auto.
Ban the AR15 or like semi-auto weapons and I won't be turning mine in.
Posted on 12/18/18 at 7:11 pm to Loserman
quote:
I have no problem with the ban of bump stocks. They are made for no other reason than to make your semi-auto fire as fast as a full auto. Ban the AR15 or like semi-auto weapons and I won't be turning mine in.
How dare you have a reasonable and measured opinion.
Posted on 12/18/18 at 7:13 pm to ILeaveAtHalftime
Just wondering. What are your thoughts on belt loops and shoe strings?
Posted on 12/18/18 at 7:14 pm to GetCocky11
The best best bump stock was the original Akins Accelerator for a 10/22 which had a spring assist. The ATF originally approved it for sale then a a few months later declared it a machine gun and required all owners to turn in the spring
This post was edited on 12/18/18 at 7:17 pm
Posted on 12/18/18 at 8:17 pm to ILeaveAtHalftime
quote:
You sound like an angsty law student.
I just like schooling the ignorant when it comes to gun laws and the 2nd Amendment.
Posted on 12/18/18 at 8:32 pm to ILeaveAtHalftime
quote:
What is the purpose of a bump stock? Why would anyone choose to have one?
I’m not commenting on the legislation or the implications. Just genuinely curious why people would even have it.
Besides doing cool shite and playing around, the express purpose is to kill as many human beings as possible in an efficient manner. Now is a bump stock the best route? Not sure I don’t persomally believe so, but I do know the main purpose of the second amendment is the right bear arms to kill human beings, specifically to kill members of a tyrannical government and their agents.
Posted on 12/18/18 at 9:36 pm to GetCocky11
Here's a link to the legislative documents if anyone is interested. It looks like the they are acheiving this through re-interpreting the terms "automatically" and "single function of the trigger"
LINK
LINK
Posted on 12/18/18 at 9:42 pm to sleepytime
IIRC, the Justice Dept. under Sessions could find no legal basis in existing law to ban bump stocks, and refused to regulate them.
Sessions gone, bump stock say "adios" faster than rat-a-tat-tat. So there's that.
(By the way, Trump has been pushing this for a while.)
Sessions gone, bump stock say "adios" faster than rat-a-tat-tat. So there's that.
(By the way, Trump has been pushing this for a while.)
Posted on 12/18/18 at 9:43 pm to GetCocky11
frick Trump for this
Posted on 12/18/18 at 9:51 pm to Loserman
quote:
I have no problem with the ban of bump stocks. They are made for no other reason than to make your semi-auto fire as fast as a full auto.
So... what’s the problem with people being able to own full auto in the first place?
Posted on 12/18/18 at 10:04 pm to GetCocky11
We just need bump stock sanctuary states or for states to legalize them in spite of federal law. It has worked for illegal aliens and marijuana.
Posted on 12/18/18 at 10:38 pm to ILeaveAtHalftime
quote:
What is the purpose of a bump stock? Why would anyone choose to have one? I’m not commenting on the legislation or the implications. Just genuinely curious why people would even have it.
It ain’t just bump stocks, anti gun activists want semiautomatic weapons banned too.
I’ve heard these anti gun fricks on various talk shows making their case for banning all guns except bolt action and revolvers and really they don’t want you having those either.
Posted on 12/19/18 at 8:13 am to Damone
quote:
So... what’s the problem with people being able to own full auto in the first place?
What's the problem with people owning nuclear weapons?
I think there are reasonable restrictions to the type of weapons that individuals own.
I happen to think that fully automatic weapons fall in the realm of reasonable restrictions.
I also think that Semi-Auto weapons can fulfill the role and reason we have a 2nd Amendment. In order to protect ourselves from a tyrannical government.
Posted on 12/19/18 at 8:44 am to conservativewifeymom
quote:
Racist pig!
At least you know yourself well enough to admit it.
Posted on 12/19/18 at 9:00 am to Loserman
quote:
I happen to think that fully automatic weapons fall in the realm of reasonable restrictions.
But full-auto firearms are completely legal for civilians to own.
quote:
I also think that Semi-Auto weapons can fulfill the role and reason we have a 2nd Amendment. In order to protect ourselves from a tyrannical government.
So semi-auto firearms are sufficient to fight against our own government, but full-auto firearms are to dangerous?
Posted on 12/19/18 at 9:11 am to Loserman
We need common sense gun control.
Repeal the 1934 NFA.
Repeal the 1934 NFA.
Posted on 12/19/18 at 9:22 am to GetCocky11
They gonna ban a shoe string? Cause you can do the same thing with that, or with nothing
Posted on 12/19/18 at 10:08 am to Loserman
quote:
What's the problem with people owning nuclear weapons?
Well clearly you aren't interested in having a reasonable discussion, since we're discussing automatic weapons and you rely on the appeal to absurdity of nuclear weapons. But to answer your questions, how would the average person go about possessing nuclear weapons? If it was legal to possess, how many people do you think would be boasting of their nuclear weapon stashes?
quote:
I think there are reasonable restrictions to the type of weapons that individuals own.
I happen to think that fully automatic weapons fall in the realm of reasonable restrictions.
Cool, your definition of reasonable is subjective and shouldn't be used to restrict the constitutional rights of millions of other law-abiding Americans.
quote:
I also think that Semi-Auto weapons can fulfill the role and reason we have a 2nd Amendment. In order to protect ourselves from a tyrannical government.
You think, doesn't jive with shall not be infringed.
You have still provided any basis for automatic weapons being classified as NFA items. Which is funny, because they aren't illegal, just expensive and time consuming to acquire. At this point, the only people who can't possess automatic weapons are the poor.
Posted on 12/19/18 at 10:15 am to Shepherd88
quote:
Should my finger be regulated as a class III item??
Or shoestrings/paracord?
Page 5 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News