- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: If we can't fix our corrupt elections ...
Posted on 7/17/26 at 1:16 pm to chRxis
Posted on 7/17/26 at 1:16 pm to chRxis
quote:
then we need to fully investigate this election and it's winner, correct?
The “winner” doesn’t need to be investigated, genius. The elections do, however. I fully support a complete audit of every election in the United States. Start with the most populous cities first. Agreed?
This post was edited on 7/17/26 at 1:17 pm
1
Posted on 7/17/26 at 1:17 pm to wallowinit
quote:
I really try not to engage with idiots, but sometimes it’s difficult but in your case I’ve made an exception.
not sure why you resort to insults when discussing something with other, but i guess you are "that guy"... do you, but i'm not the one that looks like i'm losing the discussion, as i'm not the one resorting to insults, which is a pretty clear indicator that you are not, in fact, "winning"
quote:
But I’m done
you were done way before this post, but you do you, chief...
Posted on 7/17/26 at 1:21 pm to BugAC
quote:
The “winner” doesn’t need to be investigated, genius.
why not? you don't think they had a part to play in it?
quote:
The elections do, however. I fully support a complete audit of every election in the United States.
so, if there was an investigation and it turned up that there was more corruption on the Republican side vs. the Democrat side, would you own that? would you be critical of your party, or would it just be swept aside as if it didn't actually happen?
and look, both sides cheat... both sides do some frickery at election time... it happens in every single election... but not the degree and scale, by EITHER SIDE, that is being alleged... the "corruption" doesn't rise to the point where the entire outcome is affected... there has been ZERO proof of that level of "corruption" in our elections... 6 years going, and still no evidence that indicates the scale that the fear mongerers are portraying...
Posted on 7/17/26 at 1:22 pm to wackatimesthree
quote:
One could argue that security was heightened in 2024 because the controversy about 2020 was still so fresh, but that it would relax over time as that controversy got smaller in the rearview and people forgot about it.
so, they fixed it then, but they will be lax now? remind me again, which party is currently responsible DURING the elections? who's watch would it be under?
Posted on 7/17/26 at 1:24 pm to chRxis
quote:
was 2016 and 2024 corrupt too? or just that one singular 2020 election?
Or maybe Trump actually won by so much they couldn't cheat their way to victory?
Posted on 7/17/26 at 1:29 pm to KLSU
quote:
maybe Trump actually won by so much they couldn't cheat their way to victory?
maybe... but it's interesting that no one wanted to look into those elections, at all... i mean if we are going to go after voter fraud, like they are doing in 2020, let's do 2022, 2024, 2026 too... don't half arse it b/c you won those... frick that... put it ALL out there...
what's good for the goose, is good for the gander...
frick both of these parties... i hope they both burn to the fricking ground, personally
Posted on 7/17/26 at 1:29 pm to chRxis
quote:
why not? you don't think they had a part to play in it?
If the investigation to the election leads there, then of course. But you don’t start an investigation assuming 1 person is the culprit without proof. Let the evidence lead to where it may.
quote:
so, if there was an investigation and it turned up that there was more corruption on the Republican side vs. the Democrat side, would you own that? would you be critical of your party, or would it just be swept aside as if it didn't actually happen?
Of course. Why else would I say 2024 needs to be investigated too. I am confident, however, that the left has way more to lose with election fraud than the right, and you know that too.
quote:
the "corruption" doesn't rise to the point where the entire outcome is affected... there has been ZERO proof of that level of "corruption" in our elections..
You can’t say this honestly, though. Do you really expect a Democrat run city to investigate itself for election frickery? You think California is going to investigate itself? Do you think the city of LA is going to look into the mayoral frickery? Ignore everything else I posted and just answer that. I don’t know why you people love to pretend that we should just rely on the honor system in regards to elections. Maybe it’s your compassion towards criminals or your disdain for US law. But yes, you won’t get “evidence of fraud” if those who benefit from fraud don’t investigate it. And why would they?
Posted on 7/17/26 at 2:02 pm to AmishSamurai
It is long past time to secede.
However, the current system does what it is designed to do and that is keep things as close to the middle as possible so there is no tangible action taken by either side to cause mass chaos. The govt swings to the right and the left so that 40% of the people are always mad at the other 40% when their team is out of power.
However, the current system does what it is designed to do and that is keep things as close to the middle as possible so there is no tangible action taken by either side to cause mass chaos. The govt swings to the right and the left so that 40% of the people are always mad at the other 40% when their team is out of power.
Posted on 7/17/26 at 2:12 pm to BugAC
quote:
you don’t start an investigation assuming 1 person is the culprit without proof.
interesting... b/c that doesn't seem to be how this DOJ operates currently
quote:
the left has way more to lose with election fraud than the right
again, personally, i hope both parties burn to the ground... i hate both of them
quote:
Do you really expect a Democrat run city to investigate itself for election frickery?
i expect the same stupidity and ineptness from both parties... they both suck arse...
quote:
yes, you won’t get “evidence of fraud” if those who benefit from fraud don’t investigate it.
that goes for both sides, right?
Posted on 7/17/26 at 2:18 pm to chRxis
I spent way too much time with this. You’ve not once acknowledged my point. And now you want to make it about me. And since you’ve exhibited either zero reading comprehension or an absolute refusal to acknowledge the point I’m making because you cannot dispute it rationally, I think it’s obvious that you’re the idiot here chief.
I gave you the rope and you hung yourself.
I gave you the rope and you hung yourself.
Posted on 7/17/26 at 2:55 pm to AmishSamurai
Some states have taken action to make elections more secure so it is not just one thing directed at the problem.
The Save act would be a great step though. Tillis should be stripped of his committee positions.
The Save act would be a great step though. Tillis should be stripped of his committee positions.
Posted on 7/17/26 at 2:56 pm to Powerman
What a naive fig you are
Posted on 7/17/26 at 3:31 pm to chRxis
2000 - broward county with hanging chads is suspect
2004 - probably not. The heir apparent was in office and his opponent was sub-par.
2004 - probably not. The heir apparent was in office and his opponent was sub-par.
Posted on 7/17/26 at 3:36 pm to chRxis
2016 - see broward county and Detroit
2024 - maybe, but the methods used in 2020 were under scrutiny, so minimal at best
2024 - maybe, but the methods used in 2020 were under scrutiny, so minimal at best
Posted on 7/17/26 at 3:41 pm to B747Tiger
quote:
When you quitting your day job and starting the revolution?
Likely sometime between the first and second hip replacements.
Posted on 7/17/26 at 3:44 pm to chRxis
quote:
was 2016 and 2024 corrupt too? or just that one singular 2020 election?
Did those years have all of the "tossup" states quit counting at the same fricking time? What are the odds of that? If you think those elections have anything in common you are either a liar or an idiot.
Posted on 7/17/26 at 3:48 pm to AmishSamurai
Who is in control of the news networks? The same ones who are against the Save Act. 85% of the voters are for fair elections. So who controls the Dems and the Rhino's? Not the American people that are legal residents. Trump is against an evil that is embedded in every aspect of our current govt. Barrack is still heavily involved. The Globalist including China have control. Kennedy called them out. Died protesting the loss of control by patriots.
Page 4 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News