- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: If trump and musk cut social security
Posted on 2/22/25 at 10:11 am to Drew1964
Posted on 2/22/25 at 10:11 am to Drew1964
quote:
They have only been in office a month and you are adding up numbers like they are done going through the budget.
Dude in my post I cute all non-discretionary spending to $0
ZERO
Posted on 2/22/25 at 10:11 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:Proving the point you don’t actually know what the problem is.
I've long maintained the problem with celebrating crumbs reported as DOGE-adjacent was specifically that it was a distraction from having the real discussion about our deficit. You're proving my point in real time.
How do you eat an elephant?
Posted on 2/22/25 at 10:14 am to llfshoals
quote:
Proving the point you don’t actually know what the problem is.
The problem is we spend too much and our interest will grow faster than the cuts.
quote:
How do you eat an elephant?
How do you eat an elephant with a major GI parasite is the question.
You keep trying to pretend that "we have to start with small cuts" (small bites of the elephant) is this bold strategy when you ignore that our debt, and interest, will outpace these pitiful savings.
I keep posting the 2023 budget and the increase to 2024 is going to be almost $200B.
I don't think DOGE has found anywhere near $200B in cuts. Let's say they do and we enact them. Then we still are at a 1.7T deficit each year, as the interest payments grow thereafter.
Posted on 2/22/25 at 10:16 am to ABearsFanNMS
quote:
This post may be the biggest ratio I have seen on the Poli Board…..
Ah, you zoomers and your social media bullshite.
“Insanity in individuals is something rare—but in groups, parties, nations, and epochs it is the rule.”
This post was edited on 2/22/25 at 10:19 am
Posted on 2/22/25 at 10:24 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Naw. We're just starting to pay for the boomer generation and we have a few more decades of doing so.
A big production was made about the first boomer filing for SS in 2008, 17 years ago. We aren’t “just starting to pay” for them.
The youngest boomer is 61 this year. Average US life expectancy is still below 80.
Posted on 2/22/25 at 10:43 am to Scoper
They might have to address SS disability. Lots of fraud in that
Posted on 2/22/25 at 10:46 am to Lightning
quote:
Average US life expectancy is still below 80.
Life expectancy rises with age, baw.
LINK
quote:
Most people know that the average American lives to an age between 75 and 80. Less well known, apparently, is that life expectancy rises with age. At age 60, an American man can expect to reach 82; a woman, 85.
That data is (obviously) based off prior generations (as we have to know when they died) There is a fair chance over the next 20 years, medicine improves and that 85 gets even older.
Posted on 2/22/25 at 10:53 am to Scoper
Its important to learn how to be critical of junk you read posted by liberals on FACEBOOK. Once you learn this you will not repeat dumb stuff you read on FB.
Posted on 2/22/25 at 11:11 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Life expectancy rises with age
Of course it does, for those still living. 20 million boomers have already died though.
quote:
There is a fair chance over the next 20 years, medicine improves and that 85 gets even older.
Anything is possible and that may very well happen. Or we may have another global pandemic that disproportionately affected the elderly, mirrored by the recent dip in overall life expectancy.
This analysis concludes that in another 20 years, the majority of boomers will already be dead.
quote:
Demographic projections indicate that by 2046, individuals born at the tail end of the Baby Boomer generation (circa 1964) will have reached an advanced age. The oldest person from this cohort could be 82 by then. Given the average life expectancy rates, it’s reasonable to infer most Baby Boomers will have passed away around this time. However, due to improvements in healthcare and lifestyles, some may live longer, showcasing the variable nature of demographic predictions.
LINK
Posted on 2/22/25 at 11:13 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:Which illustrates you don’t know what the problem is.
The problem is we spend too much and our interest will grow faster than the cuts.
If you don’t know why you spend what you do, or how it got that way it’s impossible to fix. That’s why Trump asked Musk to help. He’s a problem solver, you aren’t.
quote:No it isn’t.
How do you eat an elephant with a major GI parasite is the question.
quote:Thats because you simply can’t understand the nature of the problem.
You keep trying to pretend that "we have to start with small cuts" (small bites of the elephant) is this bold strategy when you ignore that our debt, and interest, will outpace these pitiful savings.
And btw they aren’t pitiful savings. They are cumulative additions. As has been famously said, a billion here, a billion there you start talking about real money.
They are multiple aspects of the problem, and to get to the solution you have to understand what they are.
You don’t. I honestly think you’re incapable of it.
Posted on 2/22/25 at 11:36 am to Scoper
How many times do people have to tell you that SS will not be cut. Holy shite!
Posted on 2/22/25 at 11:39 am to llfshoals
quote:
Which illustrates you don’t know what the problem is.
If you don’t know why you spend what you do, or how it got that way it’s impossible to fix. That’s why Trump asked Musk to help. He’s a problem solver, you aren’t.
What? I'm talking about more cuts than Trump is.
That's actually solving the problem.
quote:
No it isn’t.
You're right. The perspective was backwards
How do you fully eat an elephant that regenerates faster than you can eat, is better.
quote:
Thats because you simply can’t understand the nature of the problem.
Spending is the problem.
I'm trying to cut spending.
quote:
And btw they aren’t pitiful savings. They are cumulative additions.
If they don't out-pace interest, they're not even a net positive
quote:
They are multiple aspects of the problem, and to get to the solution you have to understand what they are.
You keep referencing this vaguely. Articulate what is "the problem" other than spending.
Posted on 2/22/25 at 11:40 am to llfshoals
quote:
And btw they aren’t pitiful savings. They are cumulative additions. As has been famously said, a billion here, a billion there you start talking about real money
When budgets come out, we will see. I think y'all will be disappointed.
Posted on 2/22/25 at 11:43 am to Scoper
quote:
Republicans will lose the next generation of elections. They'll be lucky to hold onto the reddest of red states.
If Trump and Musk build a giant mirror that blocks all the suns light it will get really cold.
Posted on 2/22/25 at 11:47 am to Scoper
I disagree. I’m 42 and have always believed i would not see SS anyway. I made arrangements for retirement myself so i won’t have to depend on the government. If they want to give me a check for my contribution i won’t complain, but i say, cut away!
Posted on 2/22/25 at 12:01 pm to jclem11
quote:
Just like "They" will eliminate the IRS and income tax and fund the government with tariffs?
No one on Trumps team implied that. Of course changing the subject helps you...thats what debate losers do.
If you don't see how removing fraud waste, makes money last longer...well then you're dumber than we thought. How you get below braindead is quite a feat
Posted on 2/22/25 at 12:08 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
SlowFlowPro
The conversations you're having (in which you are talking to people who are completely ignoring the actual numbers involved and insisting that enough cuts can be made elsewhere to not have to cut SS/Medicare) are exactly why Trump is not going to touch SS.
To make it simple, if I have household bills of $10,000 a month and $1,300 of it goes to pay down credit card debt and another $5,800 goes toward the mortgage and I end up $2,800 short at the end of every month, you're talking to people who insist that you can make up the difference without selling the house by clipping coupons, buying off-brand groceries, not eating out, keeping the thermostat low/high, and re-using sandwich bags.
This is the general populist public, both Democrat and Republican.
And Trump has a lot of guts, but he doesn't have enough guts to lay that on a nation full of people in the amount of denial that our citizenry is in regarding Medicare/SS.
I don't think any elected official does. Not anyone who can get elected, anyway. So we're just going to sail over the cliff at some point.
And I haven't read the whole thread so maybe someone brought this up among the 13 or so pages that currently exist, but SS/Medicare is insolvent today.
However, every day the problem gets worse.
I'm convinced that the allowing in millions—tens of millions—of illegal aliens was not for the purpose of getting votes, or picking strawberries, or whatever other populist narratives people like, it was because Americans are not reproducing. So in about 30 years the ratio of the percentage of the population that is paying into the system vs the percentage that is taking out will be damn near reversed from what it is now.
If we're insolvent now, what's it going to be like then?
We're either going to have to cut or just collapse one day. Maybe even one day in the lifetime of the majority of this board, maybe after. But it will happen.
As much hate as she gets here, Nikki Haley was willing to address this problem like an adult during the primaries. Almost no other politicians are.
I guess they all just have offshore accounts and run-bags stuffed with cash buried under their doghouses so that when the country collapses one day over this they can escape.
And the people you're talking right now to will still be standing there with their fingers in their ears and their eyes closed saying, "Nah, nah, nah, I can't hear you!"
This post was edited on 2/22/25 at 12:10 pm
Posted on 2/22/25 at 5:00 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:not if you can’t do it.
That's actually solving the problem.
quote:Which you would fail at, because you have no clue how.
What? I'm talking about more cuts than Trump is.
quote:Except it isn’t. It’s the mechanism that enables it.
Spending is the problem. I'm trying to cut spending.
quote:Since you’ve never built anything, or especially had to streamline an existing business you don’t know what you’re talking about.
You keep referencing this vaguely. Articulate what is "the problem" other than spending.
You have to start with the smaller departments. You’re in the tools to build the tools phase of this. You have political considerations, manpower considerations, training and access.
Trying to run without walking first is guaranteed to fail.
The mechanism that spends the money has to be broken down and streamlined, completely excised in places. And you have to sustain that going forward.
Without the support you will need from the people, you’re doomed to fail. You as I said aren’t even looking at the problem because you don’t understand what the problem really is. You think it’s money, but that’s the symptom and not the disease.
Posted on 2/22/25 at 6:15 pm to Scoper
The media has said 500 times, daily that DJT is going to cut social security. DJT has said he is not only not going to cut it, but is going to strengthen it.
Don't buy the chocolate with the psyop flavored centers.
Don't buy the chocolate with the psyop flavored centers.
Posted on 2/22/25 at 6:43 pm to Scoper
This is when you know The Left has no ammo to fight.
People see through the mud slinging attempts
People see through the mud slinging attempts
Popular
Back to top



0




