- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 2/22/25 at 8:34 am to ChatGPT of LA
quote:
It's.
The opposite numbnuts. They are fighting to keep social security solvent
Then we are doomed because our deficit will continue and our debt/interest payments will unsustainably grow
Posted on 2/22/25 at 8:38 am to jake wade
quote:
Hopefully they cut it to people that have never paid in a dime and increase it to those that have worked and paid in all their adult lives.
You cannot collect SSI if you never paid SS taxes.
Now the disability component is different.
You won't get an increase above COLA as that is not how the program was designed.
Posted on 2/22/25 at 8:38 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Then we are doomed because our deficit will continue and our debt/interest payments will unsustainably grow
Wrong.They are removing the fraud out of social security which helps with its being solvent longer
Posted on 2/22/25 at 8:41 am to ChatGPT of LA
quote:
Wrong.They are removing the fraud out of social security which helps with its being solvent longer
You replied to a comment having nothing to do with the solvency of SS.
The comment was about our federal deficit-debt-interest issue.
Posted on 2/22/25 at 8:43 am to ChatGPT of LA
quote:
They are removing the fraud out of social security which helps with its being solvent longer
Just like "They" will eliminate the IRS and income tax and fund the government with tariffs?
Why do so many of you believe the cuck in chief?
Posted on 2/22/25 at 8:45 am to jclem11
I am sure $ have been pulled from SS for other things.
Posted on 2/22/25 at 8:45 am to jclem11
quote:
Why do so many of you believe

This post was edited on 2/22/25 at 8:45 am
Posted on 2/22/25 at 8:45 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
That has nothing to do with a deficit. That has to do with debt.
Does the interest on that war money not play a role in deficits YoY.
Posted on 2/22/25 at 8:47 am to SlayTime
quote:
Does the interest on that war money not play a role in deficits YoY.
Sure, but unless you have a time machine to get people to listen to me in 2003, it's irrelevant to the discussion before us.
Posted on 2/22/25 at 8:49 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Sure, but unless you have a time machine to get people to listen to me in 2003, it's irrelevant to the discussion before us.
Lay out your plan. Mindlessly whining about what cannot be done wastes electrons. Tell us what they should do.
Posted on 2/22/25 at 8:50 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Then we are doomed b
dude, just shut the frick up you ignorant pos.
Posted on 2/22/25 at 8:51 am to jake wade
quote:
I am sure $ have been pulled from SS for other things.
of course they have. I don't think anyone is arguing this point.
Posted on 2/22/25 at 8:53 am to RohanGonzales
quote:
Mindlessly whining about what cannot be done wastes electrons.
I'm not the one saying what cannot be done, FWIW.
It's the people who don't support or understand why we need to cut SS/Medicare who are the ones whining in this manner.
quote:
Tell us what they should do.
We're going to have to make real cuts to the following:
Medicare
Social Security
Medicaid
The military
We would need to change the laws to make non-discretionary/entitlement spending discretionary and merge their tax scheme into the general fund (as right now it's allocated specifically only to those programs).
This is going to tank the economy and shrink tax receipts at first, as our economy relies heavily on public spending. The fear is that this may create a death spiral, as decreased GDP means decreased tax receipts, which means it's a dog chasing its tail ultimately. I just hope that we're not past the rubicon in that respect, or else mass suicide and accepting we're about to go back to 1600s living is the reality.
Posted on 2/22/25 at 8:54 am to Mandtgr47
quote:
dude, just shut the frick up you ignorant pos
this is you...
“Great minds discuss ideas. Average minds discuss events. Small minds discuss people.”
Do you ever have anything to say regarding any subject or idea?
Posted on 2/22/25 at 8:55 am to Mandtgr47
quote:
dude, just shut the frick up you ignorant pos.
I notice you didn't respond when the numbers were posted. I'll let you look at it again
quote:
![]()
This deficit is larger today because of the higher interest payments.
Cut all non-defense discretionary spending and save 0.92T
Slash the military by half and you save 0.4T
Add in the $236B in waste (which give a double benefit to the reduction as it accounts for lots of waste in the non-discretionary and half military budgets)
Still running a deficit
Spoiler: we aren't cutting non-military spending to $0 and cutting the military budget anywhere close to 50%.
Tell us how to create a budget surplus (to start working on the debt-interest) without cutting SS-Medicare. The numbers are in front of you.
Posted on 2/22/25 at 8:57 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Sure, but unless you have a time machine to get people to listen to me in 2003, it's irrelevant to the discussion before us.
It still affects the deficits and will continue to do so. To say it has nothing to do with our current and future deficit debacle is short sighted.
Posted on 2/22/25 at 9:00 am to Mandtgr47
I’m with you, been paying into it that long as well. There needs to be some sort of transition. They’ve gone so far down the rabbit hole with SS, I don’t know how you do it and not wipe a group of people out. But allowing the government to take our money off the top each week and then they just burn through it, can’t continue to happen.
Posted on 2/22/25 at 9:01 am to SlayTime
quote:
It still affects the deficits and will continue to do so.
Yes but that spending is in the past. We can't discuss how to deal with it today and focus on that, unless we have a time machine to go into the past to eliminate the spending.
quote:
. To say it has nothing to do with our current and future deficit debacle is short sighted.
Not what I said. This is what I said:
quote:
That has nothing to do with a deficit. That has to do with debt.
All that spending you want to focus on to distract from the conversation at hand is debt. We can't even start to have a conversation about the debt until we discuss our current deficit, as any current-future deficit will only add to that debt, and we can only control our current-future deficits.
Posted on 2/22/25 at 9:02 am to back9Tiger
quote:
But allowing the government to take our money off the top each week and then they just burn through it, can’t continue to happen.
Again. Same situation with USAID, another federal program your tax dollars went to fund. I did not see these arguments in response to cutting USAID.
This is a major problem people have with SS is that they don't see it for what it actually is: a typical tax-spend federal program, where the money taken from you in tax was redistributed elsewhere.
Popular
Back to top


0





