2
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 10/23/26 at 8:45 pm to billjamin
quote:
Idk I’m not a coryn fan so I’m not sure what you’re trying to prove.
Yeah you’re so indifferent and not interested yet in here arguing against Paxton.
Posted on 10/23/26 at 8:47 pm to DeBoar
quote:
Yeah you’re so indifferent and not interested yet in here arguing against Paxton.
Im not arguing against Paxton. I just pointed out that he’s a well known liar and that’s why no offer to drop out would have been taken seriously. I’m sorry that hurts your feelings but that’s a you problem.
Posted on 10/23/26 at 8:48 pm to billjamin
quote:
Idk I’m not a coryn fan so I’m not sure what you’re trying to prove.
What I am saying is that Paxton may be a liar but Cornyn lied to his constituents. He got punished for it. He was given the option to back the Save act and keep his seat. His constituents wanted it buy over 80%. He declined. What does that tell you about him?
Posted on 10/23/26 at 8:49 pm to billjamin
quote:
Yes Ken Paxton is a liar. That’s well known by everyone
Didn't the freak's own pastor admit he was a liar?
Riding the high horse of the "other guy" being a liar when it comes to politics is laughable.
Posted on 10/23/26 at 8:50 pm to DeBoar
quote:
Yeah you’re so indifferent and not interested yet in here arguing against Paxton.
This may come as shock to you but there are plenty of people that don't care about Paxton, Coryn, or Talarico.
You might think that everyone needs to cheerlead for someone but that is not the case.
If there are any other extremely obvious things that need explaining to you I'm sure someone here can help you out.
Posted on 10/23/26 at 8:50 pm to Warboo
You think Cornyn would have won the primary had the Save Act been passed?
Posted on 10/23/26 at 8:50 pm to DeBoar
quote:
If Cornyn couldn’t beat Paxton how was he gonna beat Talarico?
The basic argument is that non RINOs will still vote for RINOs while RINOs will never vote for true Republicans.
Posted on 10/23/26 at 8:50 pm to GRTiger
quote:
Riding the high horse of the "other guy" being a liar when it comes to politics is laughable.
This had nothing to do with freako. It’s about Cornyn not taking Paxton up on his offer to drop out. Why would he believe he would honor the deal? He’s untrustworthy.
Posted on 10/23/26 at 8:52 pm to Warboo
quote:
What I am saying is that Paxton may be a liar but Cornyn lied to his constituents. He got punished for it. He was given the option to back the Save act and keep his seat. His constituents wanted it buy over 80%. He declined. What does that tell you about him?
What does this have to do with Paxtons offer to drop out and there being zero reason why anyone should trust his word?
Posted on 10/23/26 at 8:52 pm to billjamin
So how’s that make Paxton untrustworthy?
Posted on 10/23/26 at 8:52 pm to billjamin
quote:
He’s untrustworthy.
Compared to whom?
Posted on 10/23/26 at 8:52 pm to DeBoar
quote:
If Cornyn couldn’t beat Paxton how was he gonna beat Talarico?
At first blush, that seems logical, but it doesn't necessarily translate to the general.
I am not saying this is the fact just pointing out the possible logic hole:
Paxton won the primary ~2/3 to 1/3. It is possible, given Paxton's "issues," that he can't pull in a large number of that 1/3rd that voted for Cornyn. While it is arguable that Cornyn would have an easier time pulling in the 2/3rds that voted for Paxton. The point is that some people may not have voted or voted D because of a significant dislike for Paxton. I think it is clear Paxton has a big group that dislikes him among R voters. It "feels" like that number is larger than with Cornyn.
Again not arguing that this is fact but I think your proffer has potential holes.
Posted on 10/23/26 at 8:54 pm to GRTiger
quote:
Compared to whom?
People who don’t lie, cheat and steal.
Posted on 10/23/26 at 8:56 pm to billjamin
quote:
People who don’t lie, cheat and steal.
I see. The amount of brick heads on here never goes down.
Posted on 10/23/26 at 8:57 pm to billjamin
did you type that with a straight face?Posted on 10/23/26 at 8:58 pm to GRTiger
If Ken Paxton offered a quid pro quo would you honestly trust him to uphold his end of the deal? That’s what this is about. Idk why yall try to keep trying to shift the conversation to defend him.
Posted on 10/23/26 at 8:59 pm to cajunangelle
quote:
did you type that with a straight face?
You’re even more batshit crazy than the other guy. I have zero desire to try to discuss anything serious with you.
Posted on 10/23/26 at 9:00 pm to DeBoar
He's the incumbent. Going to pull independents.
Posted on 10/23/26 at 9:03 pm to DeBoar
quote:
Blame Cornyn. Most of that was spent and given to him for the primary.
The NRSC spends on incumbents during a primary
Page 4 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News