- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: If Biden won 2020 legitimately
Posted on 7/18/26 at 7:15 pm to Robin Masters
Posted on 7/18/26 at 7:15 pm to Robin Masters
He’s just a bad faith actor and a lonely bored old man.
0
Posted on 7/18/26 at 8:50 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Have you missed the last 6 years of people denying the legitimacy?
Has anyone denied that Biden was declared the winner?
Posted on 7/18/26 at 9:11 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:Absolutely! I have no idea why you used it as an example.
Nope. That's not an equal protection issue.
Irrelevant.
You feeling Ok?
Posted on 7/18/26 at 9:14 pm to shoelessjoe
quote:
Has anyone denied that Biden was declared the winner?
Posted on 7/18/26 at 9:27 pm to DeBoar
That is the key - they do NOT demand confirmation - they only demand that conservatives present PROOF it w-uld change the outcome.
They know the officials in the suspect districts will NEVER admit any kind of legitimate oversight of their election night operations = nor any of the obvious incongruent-with-reality happenstances that occurred that night.
All they got is "YOU prove there was enough fraud to change the outcome" - a pretentious piece of bullshite blared by our own progressive stalwarts.
They know the officials in the suspect districts will NEVER admit any kind of legitimate oversight of their election night operations = nor any of the obvious incongruent-with-reality happenstances that occurred that night.
All they got is "YOU prove there was enough fraud to change the outcome" - a pretentious piece of bullshite blared by our own progressive stalwarts.
This post was edited on 7/18/26 at 9:29 pm
Posted on 7/18/26 at 9:49 pm to ChineseBandit58
Today I asked 3 different mainstream AI's this question: Who is the most retarded person on the internet?
All 3 said to draw your own conclusions, but Tiger Dropping's user SlowFlowPro is leading the pack.
All 3 said to draw your own conclusions, but Tiger Dropping's user SlowFlowPro is leading the pack.
Posted on 7/18/26 at 9:52 pm to DeBoar
My question about that election is 81 million votes? That figure just doesn't logically add up.
Posted on 7/18/26 at 9:53 pm to DeBoar
The “left only demands that Trump produce actual evidence that the result was “rigged”.
Posted on 7/18/26 at 9:53 pm to VOR
Lol sure thing
Posted on 7/18/26 at 9:55 pm to ManBearSharkReb
quote:
The voting machines being designed to where they can be remote accessed IS THE FRAUDULENT ACTION.
It is not.
You're discussing evidence of potential for fraud. Not evidence of actual fraud.
quote:
You seriously think they haven’t been building a RICO case for years?
The last reports were that they were abandoning the large scale conspiracy-based charges for smaller prosecutions
This post was edited on 7/18/26 at 9:57 pm
Posted on 7/18/26 at 9:56 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Is English your second language? Terrible interpretation there.
You sound even more defensive now. It keeps escalating
Posted on 7/18/26 at 9:57 pm to Jbird
There’s no reason to ask for confirmation of something that’s now a reality. The burden of proof is on Trump…
Posted on 7/18/26 at 9:57 pm to SlowFlowPro
It seems like there is a shitload of “anomalies = fraud” without anyone taking the time to bridge that gap with real evidence.
Given the circumstances of 2020, it makes far more sense that we’d have genuine anomalies than massive conspiracy.
Given the circumstances of 2020, it makes far more sense that we’d have genuine anomalies than massive conspiracy.
Posted on 7/18/26 at 9:58 pm to VOR
Indeed Voice of Rex
Posted on 7/18/26 at 10:00 pm to NawlinsTiger9
quote:
It seems like there is a shitload of “anomalies = fraud” without anyone taking the time to bridge that gap with real evidence.
Same thing for 6.5 years
I'm still open to direct, credible evidence though. I'm a patient man
If they ever present some I'll review it objectively
quote:
Given the circumstances of 2020, it makes far more sense that we’d have genuine anomalies than massive conspiracy.
See: my California voting data to further support this argument
Posted on 7/18/26 at 10:00 pm to DeBoar
quote:
Why do the left continue to demand confirmation of such?
Because doubt ain’t evidence, baw. The man claiming the election was stolen still has to show his work.
Posted on 7/18/26 at 10:40 pm to NawlinsTiger9
Not saying I think the election was legit or fair, but Biden was declared to have won. But, we all know that’s not what democrats or the media want to hear. They want to use whatever is said as a sound bite. You say it that you agree and don’t talk about it at length, the democrats on committees want to get their minute of trying to say no non elected officials can say Biden won so how can we support them in our government. It’s embarrassing that you have to bend the knee and agree that Biden won legitimately. It’s like they want confirmation.
Posted on 7/19/26 at 12:25 am to DeBoar
quote:
Why do the left continue to demand confirmation of such?
they just declare it is too evident to be challenged.
and unless someone can assemble a collection of a million illegal ballots that everyone involved agrees were mistakenly recorded - within the first 6 weeks, then that is stautory proof that the election was as pure as a virgins pajamas
They demand that everyone bow down to their claim of etither perfection or irrelevancy - "just because
MEANWHILE - they are eager tp stop the nations business while they rummage thru every peice of trash journalism that hits the streets and demand immediate incarceration of the suspects while the try to piece together some [impeachment} charge that delays public business for weeks/months on end.
Where a simple - HEY - our election procedures were clean, here are out records, come knock yourself out trying to find ANY semblance of incompet3nce, mistake - or even collusion to cheat - HAVE AT IT - we re CONFIDENt that you are wrong and invite you to demonstrate it to the public.
But they act like a cat with milk on its whiskers or a woman with her skirt on backwards..
Posted on 7/19/26 at 12:40 am to shoelessjoe
biden was offfucually declared the winner - he served his full term - nobody tried to prevent him from doing his presidential duties - no matter how badly he screwed them up; Only when he did the deep freeze incompetent presentation on stage where nobody could discount it did they make a move to say [hey this guy is incompetent - but that was ONLY because it was likely to impact the NEXT election - they had to do something
The entire topic opens and closes with the LEGITIMATE attempt to challenge the electors on J6.
THEN - just moments before the challenges began did they initiate their 'emergency' - which allows them to SKIP the challenges and go strait to confirmaion.
ANYONE who examines the facts and thinks the GOP had ANYtHiNG to do with that sequence of events is either stupid or a lying democrat.
NOTHING was to be gained by 'invading' the capital at that moment - in fact it handed the DEMS their lifeline for not having to defend the corruption. They get a free pass to say LEGITIMATELY ELECTED!! when in fact there were LEGITIMATE challenges that went unheard and unresolved to this very day.
ANY statement of "pure election" is product of lying mind - NOBODY actually believes that.
The entire topic opens and closes with the LEGITIMATE attempt to challenge the electors on J6.
THEN - just moments before the challenges began did they initiate their 'emergency' - which allows them to SKIP the challenges and go strait to confirmaion.
ANYONE who examines the facts and thinks the GOP had ANYtHiNG to do with that sequence of events is either stupid or a lying democrat.
NOTHING was to be gained by 'invading' the capital at that moment - in fact it handed the DEMS their lifeline for not having to defend the corruption. They get a free pass to say LEGITIMATELY ELECTED!! when in fact there were LEGITIMATE challenges that went unheard and unresolved to this very day.
ANY statement of "pure election" is product of lying mind - NOBODY actually believes that.
Posted on 7/19/26 at 12:42 am to SlowFlowPro
You would.
Page 10 of 22
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News