- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Smoke Jensen
| Favorite team: | |
| Location: | |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 34 |
| Registered on: | 12/2/2020 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: The White House Will Be Q Posting Today
Posted by Smoke Jensen on 6/29/26 at 10:35 am to DownHome
This would make sense why Trump hasn't given any attention to the Epstein Files. Perhaps there really is nothing of consequence regarding p3do stuff. If Epstein was simply a stepping stone to Uranium 1, Trump has what he needs and wouldn't show his cards yet. It would also make sense why the democrats were pushing to have the files released knowing there is nothing about Uranium 1 in them. Spitballing.
re: The White House Will Be Q Posting Today
Posted by Smoke Jensen on 6/28/26 at 1:18 pm to BoarEd
For those who have only recently joined the discussion, a brief clarification may be in order. President Trump intended to post about Haberman. Before doing so, he referenced the specific Q drop containing that name, noted its exact timestamp, and deliberately scheduled his own message to align with it. Posting at any other moment would have invited the interpretation of coincidence. By matching both the keyword and the precise timing, he ensured that Anons would recognize the correspondence as intentional and self-verifying.
Happy hunting.
Happy hunting.
re: The White House Will Be Q Posting Today
Posted by Smoke Jensen on 6/26/26 at 11:15 am to MoarKilometers
It's adorable how you think a single document dump determines the outcome of an investigation. If your attention span is measured in news cycles, I can see why patience looks like "hopium."
re: The White House Will Be Q Posting Today
Posted by Smoke Jensen on 6/26/26 at 9:51 am to Smoke Jensen
re: The White House Will Be Q Posting Today
Posted by Smoke Jensen on 6/26/26 at 9:42 am to FreedomBarefoot
re: The White House Will Be Q Posting Today
Posted by Smoke Jensen on 6/25/26 at 2:08 pm to tide06
I like your answer, however, I made a mistake. That reply was intended for Flats.
re: The White House Will Be Q Posting Today
Posted by Smoke Jensen on 6/25/26 at 1:36 pm to tide06
Honest questions: Are you new to Q and are here to learn more about what it is? Or, are you a non-believer trying to argue that it is impossible the Q operation is real?
I'd like to hear your answer to Vox's question on the previous page. Because there are hundreds of additional examples of what are known as 'Q Proofs'. From a 40,000 ft view, it is impossible that so many coincidences occurred. The only way they could have been real coincidences is if God himself made it so.
I'd like to hear your answer to Vox's question on the previous page. Because there are hundreds of additional examples of what are known as 'Q Proofs'. From a 40,000 ft view, it is impossible that so many coincidences occurred. The only way they could have been real coincidences is if God himself made it so.
re: The White House Will Be Q Posting Today
Posted by Smoke Jensen on 6/25/26 at 11:39 am to VoxDawg
quote:
Watermelon-headed, bug-eyed pervert Adam Schiff
I know you have a soft spot for Schiff LOL
That said, I have a friend who has come up with a theory that really makes a lot of sense ----essentially the idea that you can often infer aspects of someone's personality, worldview, or leadership style from their facial structure and expressions.
He calls it 'Long Face' and attributes these characteristics to those people:
Soft, weak, apologetic, bureaucratic, collectivist. He believes these people often appear uncomfortable with confrontation, less dominant, and more likely to support large institutions or progressive politics and contrasts them with square-jawed, broader-faced people, whom he associates with confidence, decisiveness, competitiveness, and traditional masculinity.
Think about the people below and draw your own conclusions:
Fauci
Trudeau
Macron
Anderson Cooper
Don Lemon
Gavin Newsom
Adam Schiff
Zuckerberg
Chuck Schumer
AOC
John Kerry
re: The White House Will Be Q Posting Today
Posted by Smoke Jensen on 6/25/26 at 9:37 am to Smoke Jensen
re: The White House Will Be Q Posting Today
Posted by Smoke Jensen on 6/23/26 at 7:00 pm to baybeefeetz
I appreciate your inquiry. The proposed strategy is multifaceted in nature. It seeks to dismantle entrenched bureaucratic apparatuses—often referred to as the “deep state”—and to institute structural safeguards against ongoing governmental corruption within the United States. It further aims to eliminate unauthorized immigration and establish robust mechanisms to prevent its recurrence. Central to the vision is the restoration of sovereign authority in Washington, D.C., to the citizenry itself, thereby realigning institutional power with democratic principles. The plan also encompasses the neutralization of corrupt elements within major media institutions.
A broader array of initiatives exists; however, widespread public skepticism is understandable. Decades of observed institutional malfeasance that has consistently evaded meaningful accountability have conditioned many to doubt the feasibility of genuine reform
A broader array of initiatives exists; however, widespread public skepticism is understandable. Decades of observed institutional malfeasance that has consistently evaded meaningful accountability have conditioned many to doubt the feasibility of genuine reform
re: The White House Will Be Q Posting Today
Posted by Smoke Jensen on 6/23/26 at 2:48 pm to hawgfaninc
This is what the folks in my former local Q circle are telling me when I attempt to drag them back into battle. The difference between them and I is that they gave up early and I've stayed abreast of current events for the last 6 years. I'll admit, I had my doubts and lost confidence in the plan many times only to be reminded by folks like Vox that we don't control the timeline. It's go time motherfrickers. Carry on.
re: The White House Will Be Q Posting Today
Posted by Smoke Jensen on 6/23/26 at 11:28 am to VoxDawg
:cheers:
re: The White House Will Be Q Posting Today
Posted by Smoke Jensen on 6/23/26 at 11:16 am to VoxDawg
The simplest thing for all of us OG anons in this thread is to simply ignore the boo birds with pluralistic ignorance. DO NOT ENGAGE. I REPEAT. DO NOT ENGAGE.
re: The White House Will Be Q Posting Today
Posted by Smoke Jensen on 6/22/26 at 4:54 pm to BoarEd
We are so fricking back! I'm here for the party
In for the history books. Look at me son! I was right!
Posted by Smoke Jensen on 11/4/24 at 11:27 pm
(No Message)
re: Questions about the probable Ukraine invasion:
Posted by Smoke Jensen on 1/21/22 at 7:36 pm to BFIV
This is a feint. Nothing will happen. Vlad is taunting Potato head because of his corrupt involvement in Ukraine, which is just as corrupt.
re: Do you hover when you use the bathroom?
Posted by Smoke Jensen on 1/19/22 at 10:57 pm to cbree88
frick everyone that hovers. You are the mother frickers that spray paint public toilets, pile toilet paper up so much that the fricking toilet overflows, and God only knows how your spray paint diarrhea ends up on the fricking walls. Yes, frick all of you. If you’re gonna hover, just open the fricking tank and pull an Upper Decker.
re: Time travel question
Posted by Smoke Jensen on 1/4/22 at 9:38 pm to Retrograde
This is the most likely explanation. If it was ever discovered in the future of mankind someone would have gone back to some time in the past and notified everyone. Then the course of history would be forever altered and on repeat. You'd have every Tom Dick and Harry going back to get rich and frick whores forever. It would be an unending loop of chaos.
re: Louisiana Used Vehicle Tax Question
Posted by Smoke Jensen on 1/4/22 at 7:18 pm to Im4datigers
I didn't like the WRONG answer given on the money board. The bank has nothing to do with "presenting the bill of sale" to the OMV. This is how it works... I obtain the bill of sale from the bank and then "I" present it to the OMV. Plus you guys on the money board are so frickin boring and pathetic.
re: Louisiana Used Vehicle Tax Question
Posted by Smoke Jensen on 1/4/22 at 7:15 pm to keakar
WRONG. Call your CPA and try again.
Louisiana Used Vehicle Tax Question
Posted by Smoke Jensen on 1/4/22 at 6:51 pm
I bought a vehicle for $XX,000 out of state and the bank that financed it sent me a true and exact copy of the bill of sale in the mail along with the title to register the vehicle in Louisiana. The express DMV in my town indicated that they need the original bill of sale, which is currently at the out of state bank. The owner/operator of this establishment also indicated she recently bought a used vehicle herself for $XX,000 but the seller agreed to write the BOS for $X,000.
If my seller agrees to a rewritten BOS for $X,000 instead of $XX,000 in front of a notary, is it possible the state would ever know any difference even though the loan is already finalized? After all, the owner of this express DMV did exactly that.
Yes, I want to screw this rotten state if it is possible without repercussions.
I’m sure many of you have had this same experience. Help a brotha out.
If my seller agrees to a rewritten BOS for $X,000 instead of $XX,000 in front of a notary, is it possible the state would ever know any difference even though the loan is already finalized? After all, the owner of this express DMV did exactly that.
Yes, I want to screw this rotten state if it is possible without repercussions.
I’m sure many of you have had this same experience. Help a brotha out.
Popular
1












