Started By
Message
locked post

I now understand why there are dictatorships and why they are necessary

Posted on 8/28/22 at 8:32 am
Posted by Geekboy
Member since Jan 2004
8084 posts
Posted on 8/28/22 at 8:32 am
DailyMail

Please read the captions under all the pictures.
Realize there are people that exist that are fascinated by this sort of subject and are intensely interested about every caption under these pictures.

Now here’s the kicker…..these types of people are entitled to…..VOTE.

Now I understand why dictators don’t allow voting. It’s not because they are power hungry. It’s because they realize a vast portion of their society are too fricking stupid to be allowed to vote. People like this should not be allowed to make a decision about anything!
Posted by GetmorewithLes
UK Basketball Fan
Member since Jan 2011
22936 posts
Posted on 8/28/22 at 8:37 am to
I guess "Benifer" is a thing again...
Posted by bayoudude
Member since Dec 2007
25907 posts
Posted on 8/28/22 at 8:39 am to
If only male landowners could vote in this country we would be a beacon of success. Women are too emotional and you should only be able to vote if you have a stake in this country. When the have nots were given the opportunity to keep voting for that gravy train we doomed ourselves
Posted by NineLineBind
LA....no, the other one
Member since May 2020
8626 posts
Posted on 8/28/22 at 8:48 am to
I’m gonna make “joint at the hip” my new catchphrase.
Posted by RCDfan1950
United States
Member since Feb 2007
39643 posts
Posted on 8/28/22 at 8:51 am to
The Founders loathed and feared Democracy, per your OP. They say that the ideal is a "Benevolent Dictator". Let's hope Jesus fills that position, in the near future.
Posted by sta4ever
Member since Aug 2014
17662 posts
Posted on 8/28/22 at 9:02 am to
So this is your way of saying, you think the US should be ruled by a dictator?
Posted by Nosevens
Member since Apr 2019
19273 posts
Posted on 8/28/22 at 9:07 am to
Absolute power corrupts absolutely. With the progressives mindset in schools teaching corrupt values we may get one but it won’t be what they are thinking it’ll be
Posted by ChineseBandit58
Pearland, TX
Member since Aug 2005
49519 posts
Posted on 8/28/22 at 9:18 am to
quote:

you think the US should be ruled by a dictator?

The absolutely best form of government that can possibly work in this human world is a benevolent dictator.

But since we have no control over who the successor to that benevolent dictator might sometime be - we must avoid the siren's song of going the dictator route.

Therefore, the second best form of government is what our founders so laboriously pounded out in the form of our constitution.

The constitution is not perfect - which is why it is preambled with = "to form a more perfect union" by providing an amendment process whereby we can continually apply our current vision of 'perfection' into our governing document.

Note even here the objective is 'perfection' - a state beyond human achievement - only the responsibility to try for something closer to the then current vision of perfection.

BUT - and here is the big failure - As Adams reminded us - even that constitution is only workable for a 'moral and religious' population.

For a population that rejects morality and religion, then a dictatorship is what they will eventually devolve into selecting - while each segment tries to out-lie - and out-steal - and out corrupt - it's opposite faction.

We are seeing that end in our sights right now.
This post was edited on 8/28/22 at 9:21 am
Posted by RougeDawg
Member since Jul 2016
7605 posts
Posted on 8/28/22 at 9:29 am to
quote:

If only male landowners could vote in this country we would be a beacon of success.


Worked well for the first 50 years. Results started getting sketchy fast when women started voting. I'm convinced JFK never would have won if women weren't voting.
Posted by Lynxrufus2012
Central Kentucky
Member since Mar 2020
19803 posts
Posted on 8/28/22 at 9:44 am to
Dictatorships are also unstable. Rome had serious issues with crazy Emperors. But having people with "skin in the game" as voters prevents the have nots from voting for "largesse from the Treasury".

“A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves largesse from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates promising the most benefits from the public treasury with the result that a democracy always collapses over loose fiscal policy, always followed by a dictatorship. The average age of the world's greatest civilizations has been 200 years. These nations have progressed through this sequence: From bondage to spiritual faith; From spiritual faith to great courage; From courage to liberty; From liberty to abundance; From abundance to selfishness; From selfishness to apathy; From apathy to dependence; From dependence back into bondage.”
Alexander Fraser Tytler
This post was edited on 8/28/22 at 9:45 am
Posted by mtntiger
Asheville, NC
Member since Oct 2003
29725 posts
Posted on 8/28/22 at 10:02 am to
quote:

vast portion of their society are too fricking stupid to be allowed to vote. People like this should not be allowed to make a decision about anything!


Then the answer is qualified voting, not dictatorship.
Posted by Tiger Prawn
Member since Dec 2016
25832 posts
Posted on 8/28/22 at 10:06 am to
Its an easy fix….if you’re on welfare then you can’t vote. When you let lifelong “takers” have a vote, they’re just going to keep voting for whoever promises them the most free shite.
Posted by ksayetiger
Centenary Gents
Member since Jul 2007
70330 posts
Posted on 8/28/22 at 10:08 am to
quote:

It’s not because they are power hungry. It’s because they realize a vast portion of their society are too fricking stupid to be allowed


Holy crap.

You are a communist
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
44345 posts
Posted on 8/28/22 at 10:10 am to
quote:

Its an easy fix….if you’re on welfare then you can’t vote.
Please outline the “easy” route to ratifying such an Amendment to the Constitution.

TIA
Posted by oldskule
Down South
Member since Mar 2016
25227 posts
Posted on 8/28/22 at 10:31 am to
I want TRUMP to be my dictator!
Posted by Geekboy
Member since Jan 2004
8084 posts
Posted on 8/28/22 at 10:38 am to
quote:

Then the answer is qualified voting, not dictatorship.

Who decides who is qualified to vote? A dictator?
Posted by Ricardo
Member since Sep 2016
6478 posts
Posted on 8/28/22 at 10:55 am to
Our fathers warned us about this kind of shite, but nobody listened. So many people thought, "They were just too mean." What we didn't realize is they were mean, but because they loved us.

"This is going to hurt me more than it hurts you."

Something the modern bleeding heart liberal should have heard growing up.
Posted by Cajun Tigah
Tennessee Mountains
Member since Jan 2005
4071 posts
Posted on 8/28/22 at 11:04 am to
quote:

Holy crap. You are a communist


Or completely frustrated by what power hungry politicians and the leaches of society have done to this country.
Posted by TeaParty
Member since May 2022
935 posts
Posted on 8/28/22 at 11:33 am to
I must be missing the obvious on what the link has to do with dictatorships. But I am not wasting my time on Ben and Jennifer life.
Posted by DerkaDerka
Member since Jul 2016
1317 posts
Posted on 8/28/22 at 12:07 pm to
I've been reading the federalist and anti-federalist papers. There is plenty of insight in there that you would never have a clue about with standard American education. Long story short-ish (still a wall of text, TLDR), many actually felt that the English model with a monarch, a house of lords and a house of commons was actually the most likely to produce good results. Knowing the context of the climate against King George they knew not to go down the path of monarchy.

Their solution was to bake in something similar with the executive, the senate and the house. Sadly, we suck and turned the Senate into the House of Commons part 2.

The constitutional convention is rather interesting as it was a correction based on the lived experiences of the states while the Articles of Confederation was active. The individual states ran things differently so they were able to use this information to identify the best and worst aspects. One of the things that Washington decried in his personal correspondence was annual elections. It was observed that where annual elections was apparent, corruption was obvious as vote buying was rampant. This is one of the mindsets that lead to the diversity in the way that officials are elected/selected and the duration of their terms.

As much as they loathed the monarch, they also did not care for pure democracy. Regardless of what the Democrats and the media says, we are not and never were intended to be a Democracy. Plain as day they knew the will of the masses needed to be tempered. In their own words they said as much.

So the one thing that is an unfortunate artifact of relatively frequent elections is that we have no ability to plan for the future. Hard pills today for a more prosperous tomorrow just doen't fly as whomever advocates such a path will not get re-elected. Of course it doesn't have to be this way, but it is this way nonetheless.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram