re: I asked ChatGPT who are the Great Houses in political board history and who is allied

SirWinston, m8

Did you do the religious factions? Quite a few there.

I measure IQ completely differently than someone like the poster in question. I judge it by one’s ability to read the room and read the tea leaves and make wise decisions about oneself and others. I am hopeless with mathematics but I am absolutely prescient in understanding where things are headed- on both a macro and micro level. I - like most people- value my own “ type” of intelligence the most. You for instance- have a very high emotional IQ but imho a very low “ where my idea would take us “ IQ. That’s not meant to be a criticism per se- it’s just that I think you miss three steps down the road. The point being- we tend to judge the intelligence of others by how it corresponds with our idea of what intelligence is.

Also- you- being a woman- have to fight the hyper- rational nature of men who discount the value of emotions. I think you correctly- like me- see intelligence as a blend of the emotional and the rational- although we default on different ends of that spectrum. But all these guys who have no room for emotional truth are completely missing the boat on a life well lived imho.

quote:

---

I didn’t click any of the links you posted but I could have sworn you claimed to be on the spectrum at one point, which is a neutral claim anyway. I do sincerely apologize if I framed that in a way to imply an insult.

---

a. I'm not on the spectrum

b. I don't care about your comment so you don't have to apologize

The point of posting the old threads was to show you didn't care about this in real time (March 2025). You even participated in the fun of that thread, certainly without protest. NC also didn't care or have reservations/protest in ream time, and he also participated in the fun of the thread.

It's just fascinating to see the extreme change in reaction to the exact same information (literally the same imgur URLs) over 15 months.

Apparently y'all forgot. I am glad I didn't

quote:

---

Well, it's either you are on the spectrum or you're actually retarded. It's one or the other.

---

quote:

---

imho a very low “ where my idea would take us “ IQ

---

I can stay in abstraction longer than many people tolerate.

quote:

---

The point being- we tend to judge the intelligence of others by how it corresponds with our idea of what intelligence is.

---

Absolutely.

quote:

---

the hyper- rational nature of men

---

You forgot to lead with “in the mythical and very unserious realm…”

quote:

---

to show you didn't care about this in real time (March 2025).

---

I’m telling you it felt like you were trying to humiliate me. You’re saying that because I wasn’t vulnerable in naming that back then, it must not actually have been true. Whatever.

Deleted this part.. it forgot about the weirdos that post here..

Lack of humor, or faking recognition of humor with a fake laugh is not only a sign of low intellect ... but can be pathological.

Re IQ: ‘Politics’ is essentially the interaction between individuals and groups towards what Values and Principles ultimately determine their societal culture. And the conditions of their everyday life; both Spiritual and Worldly.

As people’s Values are subjective, it remains that survival and prosperity would be the common Value which all people share. It does not take a high IQ to realize that, though a superior IQ would certainly affect an individual’s power towards an achieving survival and prosperity.

The big dilemma comes when Morality is introduced into the ‘survival and prosperity’ equation; such being manifest in the form of Religion. Humans in the historical record have always manifest a form of ‘Spirituality’, labeled as superstition in many cultures. Only in a Religious sense can any evolved entity hope for or believe that one might survive and even prosper, after a guaranteed death and no existence.

The essence of an evolutionary, relatively advanced, cognitive entity (IQ) has a complex perceptual psyche of the which Feeling becomes the ultimate goal AFTER survival and prosperity are established. People jump through many hoops to secure a fulfilling Feeling, and the existing Cultural dynamic determines which “hoops” are available to exploit. Therein the body politic becomes critical towards an individual’s “pursuit of happiness “. And the personal Freedom to pursue individual happiness over and above Collective ‘happiness’. Or lack thereof.

The above dynamic makes for an adventurous, challenging and truly worthwhile life. IQ nws. Children can be very happy if loved. Potentially grownups too. Cubbies embraces the crux of her Christian Religion towards service to “the least amongst you”, and argues her chosen Value accordingly. And projects this Value into the political and cultural sphere. And others present the real life advantages of a ‘selfish’ and individual freedom form of society (government).

I know. TLDR. But we are all just riding a wave anyway. It’s what we believe that determines how we feel. So I guess everyone here is serving their beliefs towards creating their feelings.

To each their own.

Apologies for the derailment.

quote:

---

NC also didn't care or have reservations/protest in ream time

---

My recollection is that posts in those threads were predominantly "self-searches" … "here's what AI said about me." It was sort of an exploration of AI engines' capacity at analysis. One of the most disappointing aspects of that exploration in my opinion is the consistent lack of thorough post search AI employs in its findings.

For example, posters whose contributions are rare are consistently cited in those searches. Some of my interests were in comparing AI's opinion of threads and posters in Tigerdroppings forums with those of Reddit, etc. AI downgrades the quality of contributions here with no knowledge whatsoever of the comparative degrees of education here versus other sites. There is no logical basis for such an analytical conclusion whatsoever. None! Considering what we expect of AI, that is beyond surprising.

I recall one such comparison in which one of the engines presumed the average level of education here to be high school, or some college, with little other input. It was completely unaware of the number of physicians, lawyers, and post grad individuals posting until I forced a follow up. So those analyses are surprisingly cursory to be kind.

My only "reservation" though regards the IQ business, and that is only in so far as I'm not sure you considered the collateral downside of the "comparisons." If you did, then so be it. It's just that such things are sometimes not as obvious when your interests are not focused on them.

We criticize ignorance and lack of critical insight in this forum all the time. That is fair game in that those qualities are correctable. IQ on the other hand, is considered immutable, at least in large part. Therein lies the difference.