Started By
Message
locked post

Hypocrisy of Both Sides- Own It

Posted on 9/21/20 at 8:05 pm
Posted by Locke Wiggin
Member since Aug 2020
24 posts
Posted on 9/21/20 at 8:05 pm
Both sides are somewhat going against what they said in 2016. I think Cocaine Mitch trying to distiguish the two is silly. Stand up and say both sides are taking opposite positions, but as the party in charge, we win.

The voting portion of America doesn't care about the nuance, they care about winning and losing. Don't try to win without winning. Plant the flag. Declare victory. No one on our side cares about the differences between 2016 and 2020, we want a win. Give it to the people and flaunt it. If the Dems don't like the way the GOP is running things, they should have put more moderate senators up for election and tried to win the Senate. They lost, GOP won, now do what you were sent there to do. But more importantly, do it with style.
Posted by Zahrim
McCamey Texas
Member since Mar 2009
7667 posts
Posted on 9/21/20 at 8:06 pm to
2016 used the biden rule of 1992, not hypocracy, it is using their own rules against them.
Posted by Jrv2damac
Kanorado
Member since Mar 2004
65193 posts
Posted on 9/21/20 at 8:07 pm to
Democrats are just mad the shoe is on the other foot.

Hypocrisy is not a good play in this scenario for them.
Posted by PrivatePublic
Member since Nov 2012
17848 posts
Posted on 9/21/20 at 8:08 pm to
Who. Gives. A. shite.

Run the damn country until you are removed from office, end of fricking story.
Posted by Sooner5030
Desert Southwest
Member since Sep 2014
1717 posts
Posted on 9/21/20 at 8:08 pm to
Hypocrisy is an undervalued trait.

it's the last thing that distinguishes us from the machines and algos.
Posted by Wednesday
Member since Aug 2017
15427 posts
Posted on 9/21/20 at 8:09 pm to
I seriously DGAF

Mitch didn’t need an excuse to hold up Garland. Obama didn’t have the votes. Trump has the votes. Dems the rules.

frick the Democrats. Fill the seat.
Posted by gthog61
Irving, TX
Member since Nov 2009
71001 posts
Posted on 9/21/20 at 8:09 pm to
Senate opposite party of president


Senate same party as president

In both cases the democrats were trying to whine the Republicans into ceding power achieved via the most recent election
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
118854 posts
Posted on 9/21/20 at 8:11 pm to
Hypocrisy or no hypocrisy. It does not matter. The only thing that matters is who has power in this situation. Trump and McConnell have the constitutional power in this situation.

It's really that simple.
Posted by Forever
Member since Dec 2019
5744 posts
Posted on 9/21/20 at 8:11 pm to
Leftists are actively trying to destroy our country. frick them and their opinions, if they want to be treated like they were pre-2016, they should act like they did pre-2016
Posted by Godfather1
What WAS St George, Louisiana
Member since Oct 2006
79733 posts
Posted on 9/21/20 at 8:12 pm to
I don’t give a shite if it’s hypocritical or not. We’re all human. We all have hypocrisies.

The left screams about hypocrisy because they have nothing else. Most of them are moral relativists, so they sure as hell don’t hold any high ground there.
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
98884 posts
Posted on 9/21/20 at 8:12 pm to
No.

It's not.

But, this is the narrative.
Posted by Proximo
Member since Aug 2011
15557 posts
Posted on 9/21/20 at 8:13 pm to
What do you call shitting on democracy by trumping up 30 year old rape charges so the duly elected President’s nominee isn’t approved? Is that hypocrisy or is it Democrat authoritarianism?
Posted by SelaTiger
Member since Aug 2016
18044 posts
Posted on 9/21/20 at 8:14 pm to
Yes, there has been hypocrisy on both sides. So when you have the power, you use it. Ram it through and let the tears flow.
This post was edited on 9/21/20 at 8:15 pm
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
67987 posts
Posted on 9/21/20 at 8:14 pm to


the 2016 position was no hearing if:

- election year

+

- opposite parties in Senate and WH


only part one is true, therefore the 'rule' is not in effect
Posted by memphis tiger
Memphis, TN
Member since Feb 2006
20720 posts
Posted on 9/21/20 at 8:14 pm to
The difference is that before the Senate was run by the opposition party. Not now.

Personally, it is the president’s prerogative to appoint SCOTUS judges as seats open and he should regardless of who is in charge of the senate.

It is the senate’s job to confirm or deny. They should vote. And if the candidate is qualified they should confirm.


But frick the Dems. They constantly change the rules to rot the game in their favor. Good for the Republican for using their own rules against them.
Posted by KosmoCramer
Member since Dec 2007
76529 posts
Posted on 9/21/20 at 8:14 pm to
quote:

Both sides are somewhat going against what they said in 2016


We don't give a frick.

The treatment that Brett Kavanaugh received in his confirmation was a bridge too far. It was an utter debacle that ruined a man's life for pure dastardly political gain. They shot for the king and missed. We didn't forget.

Dems can literally get fricked. Too bad, so sad. Y'all will do worse when you get the Senate again so we'll enjoy it while we can try to save this blessed Country.
Posted by Bobby OG Johnson
Member since Apr 2015
24970 posts
Posted on 9/21/20 at 8:16 pm to
Posted by DaBike
Member since Jan 2008
9183 posts
Posted on 9/21/20 at 8:19 pm to
As Obama said “elections have consequences.”

29 times presidents have been in last year and nominated a justice

17 of 19 Times the president and senate majority were from same party and voted to put the nomination through

2 of 10 the senate voted to put a nomination though when the president was from a different party

This I not out of the norm and has occurred many times.


Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
39498 posts
Posted on 9/21/20 at 8:26 pm to
Whatever. If dems were in this position, they’d be forcing their pick in too. Everyone knows it.
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
42941 posts
Posted on 9/21/20 at 8:29 pm to
Legitimate Questions re SCOTUS Confirmation Schedule.

1. Are you still the POTUS?

2. Can you get 51 votes for THIS candidate?

If you say “yes” twice, end of inquiry.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram