- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 5/31/18 at 10:03 pm to Kickadawgitfeelsgood
Love it when you tools mention hypocrisy.
Posted on 5/31/18 at 10:04 pm to JuiceTerry
quote:
Are we supposed to be angry
We?
Posted on 5/31/18 at 10:04 pm to Pettifogger
quote:
People who build celebrity for themselves and use it destructively shouldn't be able to hide behind a shield of anonymity (within some degree of reason).
Maybe she's doing that, but from what HuffPo has (and I assume they're only using the worst shite), she's no different than any other Trump-era twitter warrior who reposts stupid, borderline racist shite.
Generally, I agree- like Salmon says, I don’t care to track down anyone on this board. While I don’t particularly respect several, i can’t imagine tracking someone down and ruining their life over a meme. There’s no need for that.
When you cross over to dozens of tweets a day to your 200,000+ followers, NYT interviews, etc... and have a section on your website that “exposes” people for being Muslim supporters — and you barely attempt to remain anonymous (utilizing most of your name and referencing articles with your full name for instance) it’s less shocking of a story to see her outted.
It’s one of those dicey spots in our new society. Where does the right to online anonymity end? Does your stature change that? Content? Does it matter whether you’ve actually attempted to legitimately remain anonymous?
I don’t know enough here and haven’t thought about it enough to have a deep conviction. It doesn’t feel right that the husband was fired... but when the husbands company has big middle eastern contracts and the owner has a major political appointment- does the family need to consider that before she becomes a full time online commentator publicly fighting Islam (etc...)?
One spot that’s surprised me is Kellyannes husband tweeting anti trump without repurcussions. I’ll give trump some credit for granting that leeway to her, and letting her be judged on her own merit.
Posted on 5/31/18 at 10:05 pm to NoSaint
quote:
When you cross over to dozens of tweets a day to your 200,000+ followers, NYT interviews, etc... and have a section on your website that “exposes” people for being Muslim supporters — and you barely attempt to remain anonymous (utilizing most of your name and referencing articles with your full name for instance) it’s less shocking of a story to see her outted.
So we shouldn’t be surprised if O’Brien’s relatives are outed online as well. It would be fitting, after all.
Posted on 5/31/18 at 10:06 pm to NoSaint
I have far more anger toward the gleeful hatred and dishonesty of the writer/doxxer than I do sympathy for the Twitter lady.
Posted on 5/31/18 at 10:07 pm to NoSaint
The husband stuff had zero business being in the article.
Write about her if you must but let his employer deal with it in private.
Write about her if you must but let his employer deal with it in private.
This post was edited on 5/31/18 at 10:08 pm
Posted on 5/31/18 at 10:08 pm to JuiceTerry
quote:
Are we supposed to be angry about lying bigots getting light shined on them? Or a private entity firing someone who's married to the crazy bitch? Sorry, that's not how it works
If he was a poor performer at work, or acted inappropriate towards any of his co-workers then fire away. If he’s never displayed any inappropriate behavior and was a good worker why should he get fired because of his wife. Work life should be separate from politics on both ends, and honestly one of the most frustrating things today is corporations feeling the need to take a side on social issues because it’ll offend way too many people on either side. Just sell a product or service and let that be the end of it.
Posted on 5/31/18 at 10:08 pm to Jjdoc
quote:
Luke O’Brien
This is why they need to bring-back dueling.
Posted on 5/31/18 at 10:10 pm to Salmon
quote:
The husband stuff had zero business being in the article.
Not to mention her father and brother’s businesses.
Posted on 5/31/18 at 10:11 pm to the808bass
Correct.
Posted on 5/31/18 at 10:12 pm to Salmon
quote:
The husband stuff had zero business being in the article.
Write about her if you must but let his employer deal with it in private.
I doubt few would disagree with that premise but it isn't reality any longer.
Posted on 5/31/18 at 10:13 pm to FredsGotSlacks
quote:The guy was literally working with Muslims everyday. It would have been ludicrous for the WWE to keep him on. His problem is his wife, not anybody else.
If he was a poor performer at work, or acted inappropriate towards any of his co-workers then fire away. If he’s never displayed any inappropriate behavior and was a good worker why should he get fired because of his wife. Work life should be separate from politics on both ends, and honestly one of the most frustrating things today is corporations feeling the need to take a side on social issues because it’ll offend way too many people on either side.
Posted on 5/31/18 at 10:14 pm to JuiceTerry
She flat-out stated that her husband’s views differed from hers.
That wasn’t this author’s call to make.
That wasn’t this author’s call to make.
Posted on 5/31/18 at 10:15 pm to Gusoline
quote:
hell i try my best to avoid even commenting on youtube videos nowadays. even the light hearted joking comments get responded to with rage.
I was thinking about this mindset last night during the previews when I went to Deadpool 2. They were previewing the next Purge sequel and I started wondering how far from that we are. I also think Hollywood, funded by certain groups, is at work psyops wise conditioning the American people for something like Purge.
Crazy right?
Posted on 5/31/18 at 10:15 pm to JuiceTerry
The question isn’t whether the WWE had the right to fire her husband.
It is why the need of the author to call them multiple times until they fire him, and then report it?
For all we know the husband could have hated what his wife did on Twitter.
I know my wife hates it when she sees me posting here
It is why the need of the author to call them multiple times until they fire him, and then report it?
For all we know the husband could have hated what his wife did on Twitter.
I know my wife hates it when she sees me posting here
Posted on 5/31/18 at 10:18 pm to Salmon
quote:
I know my wife hates it when she sees me posting here
Based Mrs. Salmon.
Posted on 5/31/18 at 10:18 pm to EKG
The problem is that the WWE's views differed from hers, and her husband became a liability to them because of her
They probably thanked the writer
They probably thanked the writer
Posted on 5/31/18 at 10:19 pm to Y.A. Tittle
Luckily she isn’t here right now so y’all got me all night
...I live such a sad life
...I live such a sad life
This post was edited on 5/31/18 at 10:19 pm
Posted on 5/31/18 at 10:19 pm to JuiceTerry
I don’t give a shite that the WWE fired her husband. They have that right.
Page 5 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News