re: How The Voting Machines Are Hacked

The wheels on the bus go round and round, round and round.

I am not a conspiracy theorist, but your dismissal of the problem is ridiculous.

I have been following closely the Fulton County issues with the 2020 election. There were reports of issues within a week of that election, poll watchers noted numerous irregularities, this led to legal challenges filed in Jan/Feb of 2021 that as of this day have still not been resolved. The Fulton County Commission has been subpoenaed and evidence has been demanded, but there continues to be no response.

The Democratic machine in that county says the same thing you are saying,” reasonable people left this behind long ago”, and have NEVER allowed fraud investigations to be completed.

quote:

---

Safest and most secure election in the history of the universe. Joe Biden received 81 million votes.

---

NO PROOF OF FRAUD!!!!! BIG LIE!!!! BASELESS CLAIMS!!!! FALSE CLAIMS!!!! People didn't vote for Biden, they voted against Trump!!!!!

Votes recorded should always be WHOLE NUMBERS/INTEGERS.

NEVER DECIMALS.

Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.

quote:

---

Texas voter IDs are integers. Whole numbers. No decimals, ever.

The Bexar County primary poll book contained 4,110 IDs like this:

1,253,115,467.79993

That alone proves something fishy. But the math goes further — and it’s airtight.

When those 4,110 records are sorted in order, the spacing between every consecutive pair is 22,084.82189 — the same non-integer value, repeating 4,109 times. That uniformity is already impossible by accident. Then:

90,746,533.16339 ÷ 22,084.82189 = 4,109.0000

The total span of the sequence, divided by the gap, returns a perfect integer with zero remainder. A randomly generated or accidentally corrupted sequence cannot do that. Only deliberate computation produces that result.

Every one of these fractional IDs was created after polls closed — and we can prove it from the IDs themselves. The gap value of 22,084.82189 was derived from the alphabetical positions of specific voters within the completed check-in list. Those positions cannot be known until every voter has checked in and the full list is in hand. The fractional IDs could not have existed before the genuine list existed. They are timestamped by their own construction.

The records were not random fabrications. Each was anchored to a real registered voter. 735 real people each had 5 or 6 synthetic duplicates generated in their name — up to 4,110 fraudulent ballot opportunities in a single county primary, executed by someone with back-end write access to the poll book system.

The attack vector was an internet-accessible poll book platform reachable from anywhere in the world with a valid username and password. No VPN. No hardware credential. No cryptographic verification on the export that produces the official check-in record. The post-election export workflow contains no hash check and no independent audit mechanism. Anyone with valid credentials could alter the official record for any participating jurisdiction remotely, at any time.

That access was used.

The fractional ID components functioned as a precise machine-executable deletion key — invisible to poll workers under normal display settings, but recoverable by a single database query after the fact. The injection itself broke the chain of custody. The file was then replaced before formal examination could occur, compounding an evidentiary void that was already irreversible.

Officials attributed the anomalies to an export error or electronic glitch. Neither explanation survives contact with the data. A glitch does not solve a two-equation integer system, sort 735 voters alphabetically, derive sequence endpoints from algebraic positions within that sort, and optimize its output for numerical elegance. Glitches do not have specifications. This one did. The fraud in this election is proven. The scale of its impact cannot be determined from any currently available record. An election whose outcome cannot be separated from an unknown quantity of fraudulent ballots cannot be legally certified

The same platform operates across 29 states.

The Bexar County file was caught only because it was captured during the active window before deletion. A more careful cleanup leaves nothing. The absence of detected anomalies in other jurisdictions is not evidence of integrity — it is evidence that no one was looking at the right moment.

This is not a software reliability problem. Unreliable software fails randomly. This algorithm solved a two-equation integer system, sorted 735 names alphabetically, derived its sequence endpoints from algebraic positions within that sort, and deliberately discarded six real voter records in order to produce output whose internal quantities share a common factor of 15. That is a specification. Glitches do not optimize for numerical elegance.

The conclusion is the same whether you approach it from this specific case or from my multi-state database analysis published in the Journal of Information Warfare earlier this week: electronic poll book and voter registration systems built on internet-accessible architectures with no cryptographic audit trail cannot be trusted. Not this platform. Not any platform built on the same design. Partial fixes and software patches do not solve the problem when the attack surface is the architecture itself.

The only remedy that eliminates rather than mitigates the risk is full replacement — paper poll books, hand counts conducted publicly at the precinct, results posted before anything leaves the building. A paper system cannot be altered from a laptop at 11pm by someone with a stolen password.

Peer-reviewed multi-state analysis: Journal of Information Warfare, 2026, 25.2

If you are in one of the 29 states, this concerns you.

---

So far all I have seen concerning this serious issue has been money paid for libel and slander paid by those who have alleged the machines have had a problem. Since the machines are tested before the election by the counties and parishes who are to use them and they check out fine and again after the election. None of this seems more than folks who are misled trying to be a squeaky wheel. Please show definitive proof in a video of how you believe this works and not just spew what you heard. Until you do that, please feel fortunate you are not in court facing the same large civil fine others have had to pay.

quote:

---

There was not sufficient verifiable or admissible evidence that the election was “rigged”.

---

Can you point me to the court case that considered the information in the OP?

quote:

---

Since the machines are tested before the election by the counties and parishes who are to use them and they check out fine and again after the election.

---

Look at this dumb fig.