- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
HOW should voting districts be formed?
Posted on 4/30/26 at 6:27 pm
Posted on 4/30/26 at 6:27 pm
How should voting districts be formed that would be fair to all voters? And I mean fair for a common sense person, not a democrat.
Posted on 4/30/26 at 6:29 pm to jeffsdad
Geographic by population. A district should not stretch and wind all around a state just to include demographics. There is no commonality and consistency when seeking representation of a jacked up district.
Posted on 4/30/26 at 6:30 pm to jeffsdad
Minimize the ratio of perimeter to area.
Posted on 4/30/26 at 6:33 pm to jeffsdad
Geography and county/parish lines.
Posted on 4/30/26 at 6:35 pm to jeffsdad
Whatever way keeps Democrats out of power and the progressive psychos.
Posted on 4/30/26 at 6:36 pm to jeffsdad
It's difficult because keeping boundaries that were arbitrarily created (states, cities, counties/parishes, towns/townships, etc) together, is hard when they can be bigger than a election district.
There will always be fudging to gain an advantage for your side if done by people (and the systems created by them, however computer/algorithm they may seem).
It's not an easy answer lo these many years of our country, and those of the old countries.
I think they possibly be made to keep them as close to 50/50 base on partisanship as possible, but that obviously has its own problems.
It's a weird thing really.
How did the framers think they should be?
There will always be fudging to gain an advantage for your side if done by people (and the systems created by them, however computer/algorithm they may seem).
It's not an easy answer lo these many years of our country, and those of the old countries.
I think they possibly be made to keep them as close to 50/50 base on partisanship as possible, but that obviously has its own problems.
It's a weird thing really.
How did the framers think they should be?
Posted on 4/30/26 at 6:39 pm to jeffsdad
For one they should be reasonably shaped.
Here is Illinois as an example, they have a district going thru another. Pretty clear that district 15 doesn’t align politically with district 13. The largest cities in central Illinois are in district 13, Springfield, Champaign and Decatur. Also notice how Champaign, Macon and Sangamon counties don’t even fall in the same district for their counties.

Here is Illinois as an example, they have a district going thru another. Pretty clear that district 15 doesn’t align politically with district 13. The largest cities in central Illinois are in district 13, Springfield, Champaign and Decatur. Also notice how Champaign, Macon and Sangamon counties don’t even fall in the same district for their counties.

Posted on 4/30/26 at 6:40 pm to jeffsdad
Cut the state into districts to equalize the population in each and keep them geographically as small as possible.
Posted on 4/30/26 at 6:44 pm to jeffsdad
quote:
How should voting districts be formed that would be fair to all voters? And I mean fair for a common sense person, not a democrat.
They should be formed by state legislatures whose individuals are elected by the people.
Posted on 4/30/26 at 6:45 pm to graychef
six districts, 4.6 million people, 767,000 each
The top tier of parishes that touch arkansas have a combined popultation of 773,000.
Really wouldn't be difficult is just common sense applied. So you gotta leave the dems out of configuring the districts.
The top tier of parishes that touch arkansas have a combined popultation of 773,000.
Really wouldn't be difficult is just common sense applied. So you gotta leave the dems out of configuring the districts.
Posted on 4/30/26 at 6:45 pm to Stat M Repairman
Here is how Chat GPT would do it
For the U.S. House, the best realistic system is an independent commission drawing the districts instead of politicians.
The districts should have equal population, follow the Voting Rights Act, stay connected and reasonably compact, and keep real communities together when possible.
The map should not protect incumbents, and it should be checked against neutral computer-generated maps to catch obvious gerrymandering.
Bottom line: fair independent maps, not politician-drawn maps.
For the U.S. House, the best realistic system is an independent commission drawing the districts instead of politicians.
The districts should have equal population, follow the Voting Rights Act, stay connected and reasonably compact, and keep real communities together when possible.
The map should not protect incumbents, and it should be checked against neutral computer-generated maps to catch obvious gerrymandering.
Bottom line: fair independent maps, not politician-drawn maps.
This post was edited on 4/30/26 at 6:52 pm
Posted on 4/30/26 at 6:53 pm to Stat M Repairman
There is no good solution to creating congressional districts. The method varies from state to state with each state determining how they go about creating districts. There is never going to be consensus on how to pick districts because each side, Republicans and Democrats, are going to run the numbers, and whichever side determines it would not work out for them will oppose. Gerrymandering is as good as solution as there is unfortunately. From what I can tell Republicans would actually end up with more congressional seats most of the time if every state Jerry Mander to the maximum degree.
Posted on 4/30/26 at 6:53 pm to jeffsdad
Everyone wants a formula but the best way is to fight it out in each state legislature.
Posted on 4/30/26 at 6:54 pm to jeffsdad
Senate seats are based on arbitrary lines, but those lines define states which each have their own set of interests, so house seats should be based on small subsets within them, consolidating local interests. It really shouldn’t be that hard. It’s based on census info, consolidate that info by parish/county/zip code. Maybe even let people vote on it. Who needs the save act when you can referendum the districts at the state level.
The gerrymandering may very well be why we feel this huge political divide - misalignment between the policies and interests of the voting bases throughout the country. Box out the apathetic voters who keep morons in office.
The gerrymandering may very well be why we feel this huge political divide - misalignment between the policies and interests of the voting bases throughout the country. Box out the apathetic voters who keep morons in office.
Posted on 4/30/26 at 6:57 pm to Bestbank Tiger
quote:
Minimize the ratio of perimeter to area.
This is the actual answer. Plug it into AI with this goal.
But seeing as we aren’t in the business of solving problems I think it should work like a secret Santa.
Every State draws another State’s name from the hat and hands them their new map on December 25 on the last year of each decade.
Posted on 4/30/26 at 6:58 pm to jeffsdad
Start with these and expand out till equal population.
Shreveport
Monroe
Lake Charles/Lafayette
Baton Rouge
Slidell
New Orleans
Shreveport
Monroe
Lake Charles/Lafayette
Baton Rouge
Slidell
New Orleans
Posted on 4/30/26 at 7:01 pm to JimEverett
quote:
They should formed by AI and voted on by state legislatures, whose individuals are elected by the people.
FIFY
Popular
Back to top


15








