Started By
Message

re: How many of you buy this final Vegas report?

Posted on 8/4/18 at 8:17 am to
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
68402 posts
Posted on 8/4/18 at 8:17 am to
So what's the "truth?" Why is is unbelievable that the guy was not as open as previous mass murderers and spewed his garbage in manifestos or facebook? If it was cover for something or he was a tool of the shadow people, why not create a plausible excuse for the matter? Brain tumor...easy enough to find someone else's MR scan to show the public. Why not falsify a manifesto? Easy enough. Why admit that you simply don't know thereby keeping this alive for decades?

Saying they don't know seems like truth that conspiracists would like to hear if they were interested in truth rather than imaginary puzzles.
Posted by Dale51
Member since Oct 2016
32378 posts
Posted on 8/4/18 at 8:22 am to
The whole thing smells. Even the left, who could have played it up with "white guy with gun", never pounced on it. After all that time, little is known about the history and politics of the guy. The story seemed to dropped off the news cycle in record time. Why?
Posted by TX Tiger
at home
Member since Jan 2004
35657 posts
Posted on 8/4/18 at 9:11 am to
quote:

Saying they don't know seems like truth that conspiracists would like to hear if they were interested in truth rather than imaginary puzzles.


Because in every single other case like this there is always a reason, whether contrived or real. The way in which this "investigation" was so suddenly and completely dropped would make anyone skeptical.

And while we're at it, could we please drop the juvenile tag "conspiracists" on anyone who doesn't fall for the official story?

Healthy "skepticism" is a good thing, not a bad one. Since 9/11 the establishment has convinced you folks that anyone who doesn't fall for the official story should be considered "conspiracists."

That's total bullshite.


ETA: BTW, did you see my explanation (Page 6) on what was accomplished in the "Why should I believe Q" thread?
This post was edited on 8/4/18 at 9:26 am
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
68141 posts
Posted on 8/4/18 at 9:14 am to
Why does the David Hogg crowd stay away from this one?
Posted by Folsom
Folsom
Member since Mar 2006
3308 posts
Posted on 8/4/18 at 9:15 am to
Not me.
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
118956 posts
Posted on 8/4/18 at 9:29 am to
Boston Marathon bombing investigation
San Bernardino terrorist attack
Garland, Texas cartoon terror shooting
Orlando’s Pulse Nightclub
Parkland shooting

And Las Vegas -via the Mandalay Bay.

The FBI had a chance to prevent all of these.

THE FBI IS CORRUPT TO THE CORE! All of it. Including the rank rank and file. Why? Because they too are hiding shite and won’t come forward.

And I didn’t even mention Hillary’s emails, Weiner laptop or SPYGATE.
Posted by Douboy
Louisiana
Member since Nov 2007
4332 posts
Posted on 8/4/18 at 9:33 am to
Looking forward to a hard hitting documentary about this. I hope someone can pull it off.
Posted by Bluefin
The Banana Stand
Member since Apr 2011
13264 posts
Posted on 8/4/18 at 9:35 am to
Yeah, I believe his motive was simply to have “no motive.”

I put it in the same category as the Germanwings pilot who intentionally crashed that plane a few years back. He knew he had the capability to carry out the largest mass shooting in US history, and by being meticulous with his actions leading up to the shooting, he could leave people guessing as to “why” for the rest of time.
Posted by TigerFanatic99
South Bend, Indiana
Member since Jan 2007
27675 posts
Posted on 8/4/18 at 9:42 am to
That event was root caused in explicit detail in the 'Q' thread. Some of you need to wake the frick up before it is too late.
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
68402 posts
Posted on 8/4/18 at 11:45 am to
quote:

ETA: BTW, did you see my explanation (Page 6) on what was accomplished in the "Why should I believe Q" thread?
Yeah, I saw it but I had to spend time with the family. We're still going to disagree about 9-11 being an inside job. The fallout, though, has benefitted people, but there are always those who know how to finagle a dollar out of any situation.
quote:

Since 9/11 the establishment has convinced you folks that anyone who doesn't fall for the official story should be considered "conspiracists."
I've been skeptical of conspiracists long before 9-11. While not every official story is on the up and up, not every official story is a cover-up.
Posted by TX Tiger
at home
Member since Jan 2004
35657 posts
Posted on 8/4/18 at 11:57 am to
quote:

ETA: BTW, did you see my explanation (Page 6) on what was accomplished in the "Why should I believe Q" thread?

Yeah, I saw it but I had to spend time with the family. We're still going to disagree about 9-11 being an inside job. The fallout, though, has benefitted people, but there are always those who know how to finagle a dollar out of any situation.
Absolutely. Look at Man-made Global Warming.

quote:

Since 9/11 the establishment has convinced you folks that anyone who doesn't fall for the official story should be considered "conspiracists."

I've been skeptical of conspiracists long before 9-11. While not every official story is on the up and up, not every official story is a cover-up.
Agreed. But there's just overwhelming evidence suggesting this wasn't what we were told it was.
Posted by TakingStock
Member since Jun 2009
6092 posts
Posted on 8/4/18 at 12:07 pm to
The lack of detail around Paddock’s background, how he actually made his money in real estate and had enough to be a “professional gambler” as well as supposed jobs as an IRS agent and postman are strange as well,
Posted by LSUvet72
Member since Sep 2013
12106 posts
Posted on 8/4/18 at 12:09 pm to
It was a hit on Trumpers and the country music deplorables but the Deep State after the Scalise shooting won't allow it to be discovered as it could cost the Demos , which Pallock definitely was.....

Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
85109 posts
Posted on 8/4/18 at 12:09 pm to
I must say, if this is some sort of cover up, it's the shittiest one in history. You'd think a cover up would have some kind of motive at the very least.

The fact that there are still so many inexplicable parts of the story leads me to believe it's not a cover up. A cover up would wrap this up in a nice bow.
Posted by Paluka
One State Over
Member since Dec 2010
10763 posts
Posted on 8/4/18 at 12:16 pm to
quote:

The fact that there are still so many inexplicable parts of the story leads me to believe it's not a cover up. A cover up would wrap this up in a nice bow.


That’s what they want you to think! Sarcasm on.
Posted by EA6B
TX
Member since Dec 2012
14754 posts
Posted on 8/4/18 at 12:43 pm to
quote:

The lack of detail around Paddock’s background, how he actually made his money in real estate and had enough to be a “professional gambler” as well as supposed jobs as an IRS agent and postman are strange as well,


Lack of detail? Every aspect of his life, what his hobbies were, every place he lived, who he lived with, who he worked with, every piece of real estate he owned, what he paid for it, what he sold it for, what has income was from the property, and how much money he had at various times in his life, that information has all been available since the first weeks after the shootings.

Here is a good summary of his real estate investments.

LINK

This post was edited on 8/4/18 at 12:49 pm
Posted by TX Tiger
at home
Member since Jan 2004
35657 posts
Posted on 8/4/18 at 3:02 pm to
quote:

The fact that there are still so many inexplicable parts of the story leads me to believe it's not a cover up. A cover up would wrap this up in a nice bow.
Unless the cover up was so badly botched that they simply had to drop it all together.
Posted by OweO
Plaquemine, La
Member since Sep 2009
114025 posts
Posted on 8/4/18 at 3:16 pm to
quote:

Can we at least see a video of him walking through the hotel with his bags? I have not seen one


Here. This is video the nytimes was able to obtain from Mandalay Bay.

LINK

It shows how he was able to get all of his weapons up to the hotel. It really isn't that hard to do. In most Vegas hotels, there is a rotation of people who are monitoring the entrance part of the hotels so it's not like the same person would be there over a few day period to say "hmmmm.. that guy went up to his hotel multiple times within the past few days, with multiple suitcases on the luggage rack. Maybe he is storing a bunch of guns to shoot people".

What's hard to believe about some guy deciding to commit suicide, but wanting to do some grand finale before doing so? He obviously wasn't thinking on a completely rational level.

All the conspiracy theories on this is insane. If there was more to it.. Don't you think... There would be more to the whole situation? Why would any type of group want someone to go and shoot at random people and then have that person kill himself?
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
64447 posts
Posted on 8/4/18 at 3:17 pm to
Smells funny but other than that
Posted by Placebeaux
Bobby Fischer Fan Club President
Member since Jun 2008
51852 posts
Posted on 8/4/18 at 4:17 pm to
The NY Times is fake racist news.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram