How do shooters’ social media accounts get scrubbed from the internet so quickly?

What’s his name?

Link to anything detailing who he is?

Don't remember seeing any social media for Thomas Crooks (other than the Black Rock commercial).

Whatever happened with this story that Thomas Crooks was emailing back and forth with LE a couple days before the incident?

I get what you’re saying, but the OP didn’t explicitly mention either way or have it be a leading question at all.

Also, why not both? Within like 4 comments, both sides of the coin were mentioned by people.

That’s pretty good grounds for a discussion, no?

quote:

---

How about possibly so copy cats wouldn’t be spurred to action after absorbing his social media

---

Yeah im thinking Meta would be on the hook for quite a few millions, maybe even billions, if they left up a shooters socials and it inspired a similar atrocity.

I would hope if our CIA was grooming shooters they would prohibit them from having social media in the first place.

Isn't the excuse normally.. "to prevent copycats"?


Reality seems to be so that msm and gov can control the narratives. If the person is white, the automatic narrative is that they are nazis who did it fulfill some greater nazi goal. Other white people need to be held accountable. If the person wasn't white, narrative is that they are just lone wolves, who have mental problems.

Of course there're variables. Such as if the attacker is a very public white lgbt or white woke, then the narrative becomes it's the victims or institutions fault for being oppressive, and forcing the poor attacker to snap and take matters into their own hands in a desperate attempt to bring change.

i would have hoped the 4chan autists would have gotten to it before it was scrubbed...