- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: House passes CROWN Act!
Posted on 3/18/22 at 12:54 pm to Jbird
Posted on 3/18/22 at 12:54 pm to Jbird
Why are we legislating social constructs?
An employer isn't discriminating against a job candidate because they believe that their large rasta style dreads indicate that they cannot perform. They discriminate because they believe it will have negative impacts where they may lose business to clients who find that hair style to be unprofessional.
Dressing for success and acceptable grooming practices are highly subjective based upon industry and local culture. I understand that hair texture, in particular amongst the African diaspora, makes it difficult to conform with other ethnicities.
No one should be demanding that black people flat iron or chemically treat their hair to look more like "white peoples' hair." It's the more extreme hair styles that look more appropriate on a circus performer than in the office.
An employer isn't discriminating against a job candidate because they believe that their large rasta style dreads indicate that they cannot perform. They discriminate because they believe it will have negative impacts where they may lose business to clients who find that hair style to be unprofessional.
Dressing for success and acceptable grooming practices are highly subjective based upon industry and local culture. I understand that hair texture, in particular amongst the African diaspora, makes it difficult to conform with other ethnicities.
No one should be demanding that black people flat iron or chemically treat their hair to look more like "white peoples' hair." It's the more extreme hair styles that look more appropriate on a circus performer than in the office.
2
Posted on 3/18/22 at 12:55 pm to Jbird
You understand how stupid the hairstyles are going to get, right? This is incredibly shortsighted.
Posted on 3/18/22 at 12:56 pm to Bmath
cultural transnational progressive marxism
Posted on 3/18/22 at 12:57 pm to Jbird
Sweet I'm shaving either a dick or a swaistka in my head.
Posted on 3/18/22 at 12:59 pm to Ace Midnight
quote:
backfire when there are dudes with dreadlocks/cornrows who are white
yeah - they'll get prosecuted for cultural appropriation = hate crime.
Posted on 3/18/22 at 12:59 pm to loopback
What about a dick with a swastika on it or a swastika made of dicks?
Posted on 3/18/22 at 1:38 pm to teke184
quote:
swastika made of dicks
This is the way.
Posted on 3/18/22 at 2:43 pm to Jbird
I was worried it would not pass, looks like the Democrats fixed another major problem.
Posted on 3/18/22 at 2:54 pm to Jbird
When will the full body tattoo act be presented and passed? Buncha damn mentality iill idiotic freaks they are.
Posted on 3/18/22 at 2:56 pm to Great Plains Drifter
Let me guess, this was a Democrat bill?
Posted on 3/18/22 at 2:58 pm to Jbird
Im all for every restaurant discriminating against long hair.
no one wants your nasty shite in their food.
no one wants your nasty shite in their food.
Posted on 3/18/22 at 2:58 pm to Jbird
Thank God. It is about time. I have been complaining about this discrimination my whole life. 
Posted on 3/18/22 at 3:03 pm to omegaman66
Hair, not hats.
Posted on 3/18/22 at 3:06 pm to Jbird
Can I wear my skinhead to work now?
Posted on 3/18/22 at 3:08 pm to Jbird
quote:
The House passed legislation on Friday that would prohibit discrimination against people with hair styles associated with a particular race or national origin.
This include Anglos and male-pattern baldness and action with the ladies?
Posted on 3/18/22 at 3:13 pm to Bmath
quote:
No one should be demanding that black people flat iron or chemically treat their hair to look more like "white peoples' hair." It's the more extreme hair styles that look more appropriate on a circus performer than in the office.
The problem is that black people have still been discriminated against because of their hair not only in employment, but at school when it comes to the dress code.
Case in point
Posted on 3/18/22 at 3:19 pm to c on z
quote:
The problem is that black people have still been discriminated against
By white liberals by dumbing down their speech and vocabulary when talking to blacks meanwhile white conservatives don’t dumb down their speech and vocabulary when talking to blacks
Care to comment or run away like a bitch?
Posted on 3/18/22 at 3:21 pm to c on z
Length restrictions on hair aren’t racist no matter what you or the court claim.
Many schools have generally held that any hair longer than collar length is too long for a boy.
Many schools have generally held that any hair longer than collar length is too long for a boy.
Posted on 3/18/22 at 3:24 pm to teke184
quote:
Many schools have generally held that any hair longer than collar length is too long for a boy.
But now they can identify as a girl and keep it as long as they like.
Posted on 3/18/22 at 3:28 pm to Perse
quote:
It will become a burden on employers and businesses to accommodate these freaks.
Now wait just a minute. Are you implying that if a crappy employee is fired she will hire a lawyer and sue for crown discrimination? No lawyer would stoop so low.
Page 3 of 4
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News