Started By
Message

re: Here’s my problem with the idea of the civil war was fought over slavery

Posted on 6/17/20 at 9:55 am to
Posted by mgdtiger
Member since May 2006
3288 posts
Posted on 6/17/20 at 9:55 am to
No doubt they were hypocritical. Just as all politicians were. They were for states rights to their benefit. The push to get the fugitive slave act harsher as part of the compromise of 1850 was definitely anti states rights. It also brought the idea of slavery to the north and the horrors of it along with the the popularity of uncle toms cabin.
Posted by troyt37
Member since Mar 2008
14684 posts
Posted on 6/17/20 at 10:00 am to
quote:

I don't know how many more times I can point this out. The south vehemently opposed the north's state's rights when they wanted to pass slavery laws that they didn't like.

This is a documented fact.


Well, go ahead and document it then. Because I don't think the slave states gave a damn about the yankee states laws, beyond the refusal of the yankee states to return the southern states valuable property.

Now, if you are talking about the yankee states passing slavery laws that bound the southern states, that's entirely different, and has diddly shite to do with the north's state's rights.

Posted by notsince98
KC, MO
Member since Oct 2012
22088 posts
Posted on 6/17/20 at 10:02 am to
quote:

LOL! Which words were those? Post the quote.


Here is one example:
quote:

...If I could save the Union without freeing any slave I would do it,..


His personal letters are all online. You can go read them yourself. He was very clear about his thoughts of blacks being inferior and he had no problems with slavery.

He only cared about killing innocent people who dared think states have the right to secede.
This post was edited on 6/17/20 at 10:05 am
Posted by More&Les
Member since Nov 2012
14684 posts
Posted on 6/17/20 at 10:07 am to
quote:

*The War of Northern Aggression


Just for clarification, did the North attack themselves at Fort Sumter?
Posted by boxcar willie
kenner
Member since Mar 2011
16174 posts
Posted on 6/17/20 at 10:09 am to
wars have always been fought by poor people for the interests of others, nothing different here.
Posted by Ancient Astronaut
Member since May 2015
37338 posts
Posted on 6/17/20 at 10:09 am to
It was fought over many things including slavery.
Posted by BamaMamaof2
Atlanta, GA
Member since Nov 2019
2669 posts
Posted on 6/17/20 at 10:12 am to
quote:

Well, go ahead and document it then. Because I don't think the slave states gave a damn about the yankee states laws, beyond the refusal of the yankee states to return the southern states valuable property.

Now, if you are talking about the yankee states passing slavery laws that bound the southern states, that's entirely different, and has diddly shite to do with the north's state's rights.



I have asked him to document where the southern states opposed any northern states rights and I got nothing back from him!

It is such a ridiculous argument! The south just wanted to be left alone to govern themselves as it was written in the US Constitution at that time. So many people don't know how limited the federal government was at that time and they only know what they learned in their US History class in HS.
Posted by notsince98
KC, MO
Member since Oct 2012
22088 posts
Posted on 6/17/20 at 10:12 am to
quote:

Just for clarification, did the North attack themselves at Fort Sumter?


The union invaded South Carolina first. You are correct that the union initiated the aggression.
This post was edited on 6/17/20 at 10:13 am
Posted by BFIV
Virginia
Member since Apr 2012
8885 posts
Posted on 6/17/20 at 10:16 am to
So much ignorance about the Civil War in this thread. Good grief, people, do lots of research and stop regurgitating your high school and college history 101 textbook passages. A detailed study, alone, of Lincoln's speeches and letters will open your eyes to a lot of untaught history.
Posted by 56lsu
jackson mich
Member since Dec 2005
8053 posts
Posted on 6/17/20 at 10:40 am to
what have you done for your country besides run your mouth on the internet.
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
13551 posts
Posted on 6/17/20 at 10:45 am to
quote:

An opinion piece by the Washington Post!

Really, that is what you are posting as relevant facts?


The article lists several verifiable facts. Which of them do you dispute?
Posted by cwill
Member since Jan 2005
54755 posts
Posted on 6/17/20 at 10:49 am to
quote:

No one is saying slavery wasn't an issue in the war, but it was a part of the war, not the only reason for the war.


It was the reason for the war - the southern states couldn't make it anymore clear than that...anything else is revisionist history by southern descendants ashamed of the cause.
Posted by mindbreaker
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2011
7916 posts
Posted on 6/17/20 at 10:55 am to
quote:

beyond the refusal of the yankee states to return the southern states valuable property.


Did you just really refer to human beings as "valuable property"

Jesus tap dancing Christ these people still exist.
Posted by troyt37
Member since Mar 2008
14684 posts
Posted on 6/17/20 at 10:55 am to
quote:

The article lists several verifiable facts. Which of them do you dispute?



The ones that are horseshite, which is what is being discussed in this thread, and to which I see you have no response.
Posted by concrete_tiger
Member since May 2020
7477 posts
Posted on 6/17/20 at 10:59 am to
When the robots take over, they'll be pissed at every one of you that owns a Roomba. Liberate that little robot NOW. Spare your family!
Posted by BamaMamaof2
Atlanta, GA
Member since Nov 2019
2669 posts
Posted on 6/17/20 at 11:00 am to
quote:

The article lists several verifiable facts. Which of them do you dispute?


There were quotes and the writers interpretation of what the quotes meant. I don't call that factual information when the writer interprets a quote to fit is narrative.

What verifiable facts not in dispute here are listed in this article?
Posted by troyt37
Member since Mar 2008
14684 posts
Posted on 6/17/20 at 11:00 am to
quote:

Did you just really refer to human beings as "valuable property"


Excuse me if the facts surrounding the issue offends you. That is what slaves were considered by those who bought and paid for them. If you are trying to extrapolate that into meaning that's what I believe, then you can frick right off. I'm sure that's a great tactic in some arenas, but that's about all it is. If the facts are too much for you, maybe you should find a Kardashian thread somewhere.
Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
84013 posts
Posted on 6/17/20 at 11:01 am to
quote:

It was the reason for the war - the southern states couldn't make it anymore clear than that...anything else is revisionist history by southern descendants ashamed of the cause.
Exactly

Here is a list of the free states that joined the Confederacy:
This post was edited on 6/17/20 at 11:02 am
Posted by BFIV
Virginia
Member since Apr 2012
8885 posts
Posted on 6/17/20 at 11:04 am to
Just a portion of Lincoln's words after the 4th Lincoln/Douglas debates:

While I was at the hotel to—day, an elderly gentleman called upon me to know whether I was really in favor of producing a perfect equality between the negroes and white people. [Great Laughter.] While I had not proposed to myself on this occasion to say much on that subject, yet as the question was asked me I thought I would occupy perhaps five minutes in saying something in regard to it. I will say then that I am not, nor ever have been, in favor of bringing about in any way the social and political equality of the white and black races, [applause]—that I am not nor ever have been in favor of making voters or jurors of negroes, nor of qualifying them to hold office, nor to intermarry with white people; and I will say in addition to this that there is a physical difference between the white and black races which I believe will forever forbid the two races living together on terms of social and political equality. And inasmuch as they cannot so live, while they do remain together there must be the position of superior and inferior, and I as much as any other man am in favor of having the superior position assigned to the white race. I say upon this occasion I do not perceive that because the white man is to have the superior position the negro should be denied every thing. I do not understand that because I do not want a negro woman for a slave I must necessarily want her for a wife. [Cheers and laughter.] My understanding is that I can just let her alone. I am now in my fiftieth year, and I certainly never have had a black woman for either a slave or a wife. So it seems to me quite possible for us to get along without making either slaves or wives of negroes. I will add to this that I have never seen, to my knowledge, a man, woman or child who was in favor of producing a perfect equality, social and political, between negroes and white men.

Our history books completely ignore and exclude this portion of our history.
Posted by troyt37
Member since Mar 2008
14684 posts
Posted on 6/17/20 at 11:11 am to
quote:

Here is a list of the free states that joined the Confederacy:


Now do a list of the free states to which extensive slavery existed when the Civil War started.
first pageprev pagePage 8 of 10Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram