Started By
Message

Has the Clancy case set back the first female president even further?

Posted on 9/5/26 at 11:10 am
Posted by PNW_TigerSaint
Member since Oct 2016
1425 posts
Posted on 9/5/26 at 11:10 am
This high profile nature of this case has created a lot of conversations about accountability and the role hormones and mental health play in that.

Anecdotally, I know a few guys who have been shocked that their female partners don’t fully share their opinion on Clancy's culpability. This has likely been very eye opening for many people in our country.

I wonder if when the time comes to vote, the candidates gender will play an even larger unconscious (or conscious) bias. When it comes to giving someone access to the nuclear football that can’t be held accountable for their actions in certain circumstances, I could see many independent men (and women) giving pause.
Posted by tiger789
on the bayou
Member since Dec 2008
2761 posts
Posted on 9/5/26 at 11:16 am to
quote:

Has the Clancy case set back the first female president even further?



Posted by Bass Tiger
Member since Oct 2014
56739 posts
Posted on 9/5/26 at 11:16 am to
A shite ton of women in the US have gone completely off their rockers. Not sure exactly what fricked them up but I think there is a strong correlation of bat shite crazy women and college grads who are women.
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
83817 posts
Posted on 9/5/26 at 11:16 am to
Many women are claiming that because of hormones they can't be held accountable.


People who can't be held accountable should not be in positions of serious responsibility.

Posted by Hateradedrink
Member since May 2023
4237 posts
Posted on 9/5/26 at 11:45 am to
No. Anyone who is letting this case influence gender-based voting was never going to vote for a woman in the first place, and someone who would vote for a woman wouldn’t let this influence their vote.
Posted by Sizzle_DAWG
Sanford Stadium
Member since Jan 2024
2429 posts
Posted on 9/5/26 at 11:49 am to
The only thing a woman should be in charge of is making a ham sandwich.
Posted by ELVIS U
Member since Feb 2007
12015 posts
Posted on 9/5/26 at 11:49 am to
How could we ever trust a woman with the nuclear codes when they are very susceptible to voices they hear in their heads? From Eve to Clancy, they keep proving they can never be trusted with our treasure or blood.
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
171607 posts
Posted on 9/5/26 at 11:56 am to
Absolutely not. There are plenty of women who aren't hypnotized to have disdain for the nuclear family.

Those women dressed in pink were like code pink nutty.

They won a case outside the court with that defense attorney that trumped over a judge.

Massachusetts nor Illinois don't get to decide nationwide politics and get to wipe out all sensible women.

Look at Tulsi Gabbard. Many women are astute and stable in business and the military.

Code pink is paid by the communist enemy, the CCP. Dont let inane leftist, wino, mommy sleuthing, Karens win. They are the extreme minority like Candace Owens and the jew hater gang.
This post was edited on 9/5/26 at 11:59 am
Posted by B747Tiger
Member since Jul 2026
1069 posts
Posted on 9/5/26 at 11:56 am to
quote:

the first female president


Hopefully there is never such a thing.
Posted by Ricardo
Member since Sep 2016
6773 posts
Posted on 9/5/26 at 12:03 pm to
quote:

A shite ton of women in the US have gone completely off their rockers. Not sure exactly what fricked them up but I think there is a strong correlation of bat shite crazy women and college grads who are women.



Women have been programmed to hate their own biological purpose. The one thing that is demonstrated to make them happy is the thing they fear the most.
Posted by burke985
UGANDA
Member since Aug 2011
29134 posts
Posted on 9/5/26 at 12:06 pm to
Why the frick do you betas want to be led by a woman so bad for, that's embarrassing no wonder these kids are such pussies mentally these days
Posted by Bobby OG Johnson
Member since Apr 2015
34325 posts
Posted on 9/5/26 at 12:07 pm to
quote:

Has the Clancy case set back the first female president even further?



It is not just men that are questioning this & other positions of power in general. Much to their credit there are women with enough sense that are disgusted and bewildered by what has taken place. They are a vocal minority but I think that may be because they do not wish to be attacked by the crazies or they just keep to themselves as a general rule.


Posted by Wednesday
Member since Aug 2017
17421 posts
Posted on 9/5/26 at 12:11 pm to
quote:

Has the Clancy case set back the first female president even further?


100% yes.
Posted by Champagne
Sabine Free State.
Member since Oct 2007
56385 posts
Posted on 9/5/26 at 12:12 pm to
quote:

From Eve to Clancy


What a great name for a Punk Rock band !!
Posted by Wednesday
Member since Aug 2017
17421 posts
Posted on 9/5/26 at 12:13 pm to
These pink clad Clancy freaks have made it so much more difficult for all women.

Shedding both accountability and maternal love is quite a feat
Posted by Arkaea79
Member since Sep 2022
1159 posts
Posted on 9/5/26 at 12:16 pm to
quote:

Many women are claiming that because of hormones they can't be held accountable.



Rape should be excused due to high testosterone then. Thems the rules.
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
171607 posts
Posted on 9/5/26 at 12:53 pm to
I dont think they should be allowed to let all women be judged as these Karen moms.

Look how quickly all of these female lives were studied and presented. It seems like a bullshite narrative to me like covid...

Like articles were readied...

MUH PPD PSYCHOSIS is no longer very rare.

Video I'm Not Ok: America's Postpartum Crisis - ABC News LINK

What is the end goal of this op?

Other then Demoralization/ destabilization? I sense it is insidious and controlled somehow.

What do you think?
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
171607 posts
Posted on 9/5/26 at 1:08 pm to
Put another way. It seems like PPD feelings and issues do happen on a small scale, but it is not a large percentage. Therefore it is not a crisis.

My grandmother and her kids had large families, had miscarriages, lost babies. No one killed their babies and no one complained.

This post was edited on 9/5/26 at 1:11 pm
Posted by Willie Stroker
Member since Sep 2008
17307 posts
Posted on 9/5/26 at 1:15 pm to
quote:

Hopefully there is never such a thing.

My wife has said the same thing.

I think she believes there is a lot of truth in the stereotype that women lead with emotion and that reasoning in a logical way just doesn’t come naturally due to hormones being a dominant characteristic of being female.
Posted by UtahCajun
Member since Jul 2021
7661 posts
Posted on 9/5/26 at 1:24 pm to
quote:

Why the frick do you betas want to be led by a woman so bad for, that's embarrassing no wonder these kids are such pussies mentally these days

I am laughing because you most likely think you are better than a beta. Bruh, you are most likely a gamma.

To the OP, I do not believe it has. What is holding women back more than anything is the lack of good candidates and the strongest female cadidate of all time was pushed aside by her own party (speaking of Tulsi). For the most part, female candidates have been a big bag of WTF.
This post was edited on 9/5/26 at 1:31 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram