Started By
Message

re: Has the Clancy case set back the first female president even further?

Posted on 9/5/26 at 1:24 pm to
Posted by 4cubbies
Member since Sep 2008
63022 posts
Posted on 9/5/26 at 1:24 pm to
quote:

I think she believes there is a lot of truth in the stereotype that women lead with emotion


Lucky for us, we have a stoic POTUS who leads with carefully considered action only. Imagine if he had hormones!!! (This is the part where we pretend testosterone isn’t a hormone that affects behavior).
Posted by UtahCajun
Member since Jul 2021
7661 posts
Posted on 9/5/26 at 1:32 pm to
quote:

 (This is the part where we pretend testosterone isn’t a hormone that affects behavior)

It shouldn't by his age unless.....

DJT is on the TRT!!!
This post was edited on 9/5/26 at 1:33 pm
Posted by 4cubbies
Member since Sep 2008
63022 posts
Posted on 9/5/26 at 1:37 pm to
I want to supplement estrogen at half his age so hopefully he is doing HRT.

I hear it staves off signs of aging.
Posted by UtahCajun
Member since Jul 2021
7661 posts
Posted on 9/5/26 at 1:44 pm to
quote:

I want to supplement estrogen at half his age so hopefully he is doing HRT.

I hear it staves off signs of aging

I have friends on TRT. They say they feel great. I tried. Levels are too high.

If your insurance covers it, go for it.

Edit - wife and I just crossed the border from Slovenia to Croatia! Next stop....food!
This post was edited on 9/5/26 at 1:46 pm
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
83817 posts
Posted on 9/5/26 at 2:00 pm to
quote:

Imagine if he had hormones!!!


He does.

But like all men, he doesn't get to use that as an excuse to dodge accountability.
Posted by Tigersforthee
Member since Dec 2025
216 posts
Posted on 9/5/26 at 2:11 pm to
Can't wait for the first POTUS debate when they ask how the candidates feel about whether depressed women should be able to murder their children and get away with it. I suspect the Dem, any Dem really, will stammer and stutter a non answer for obvious reasons. What a world we now live in.
Posted by Tigersforthee
Member since Dec 2025
216 posts
Posted on 9/5/26 at 2:13 pm to
Perhaps not women in general, but any individual woman on record as supporting this should never have any authority over anyone.
Posted by DarthTiger
Member since Sep 2005
3339 posts
Posted on 9/5/26 at 2:21 pm to
Given that a female president would likely be liberal, I doubt it.
Posted by 4cubbies
Member since Sep 2008
63022 posts
Posted on 9/5/26 at 2:24 pm to
quote:

Edit - wife and I just crossed the border from Slovenia to Croatia! Next stop....food!


Fun! I don’t know anything about that cuisine but enjoy!
Posted by Willie Stroker
Member since Sep 2008
17307 posts
Posted on 9/5/26 at 3:07 pm to
quote:

Lucky for us, we have a stoic POTUS who leads with carefully considered action only. Imagine if he had hormones!!! (This is the part where we pretend testosterone isn’t a hormone that affects behavior).

I make no excuses for the things our President says. But it is clear that he listens to his advisors and values good judgement from them. They have talked him out of crazy shite and have helped him execute hard things that must be done.

His weakness is not hormones. It’s narcissism. Psychological characteristics are easier to address than hormonal ones. Many strong leaders have that psychological trait. But not all narcissists have good women beside them to help them overcome their weaknesses.

Yes, men have hormonal issues too. That’s why we see both sports performance and criminal behavior peaking around age 28. That’s also why the founding fathers put in a minimum age to be President. It unfortunately didn’t stop most of them from thinking with their dicks.
This post was edited on 9/5/26 at 3:26 pm
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
118127 posts
Posted on 9/5/26 at 3:43 pm to
quote:

There are plenty of women who aren't hypnotized to have disdain for the nuclear family.

I agree, but in general it's obvious that on the 'logic vs. emotion' scale the men generally make decisions based on logic and women on emotion. The logical women I've discussed this with totally agree and they don't trust female leadership of policy.
Posted by Wolfwireless
Member since Aug 2024
5828 posts
Posted on 9/5/26 at 3:56 pm to
quote:

The only thing a woman should be in charge of is making a ham sandwich.

Is it tho? What if that special memory allocation they have in their brain pops off something one of us did 5 years ago, and she decides to poison him.

(This is a joke)
Posted by WBKelso
Member since Jul 2026
62 posts
Posted on 9/5/26 at 4:01 pm to
If a child can't expect it's mother to protect him or her, why or how would an entire country count on someone who can go on a murder spree because the flip of a hormonal switch or a mysterious once in a life time voice tells her to murder someone, or an entire political party...or an entire country?
Posted by Houag80
Member since Jul 2019
20181 posts
Posted on 9/5/26 at 4:07 pm to
Shut up, bitch.
Posted by Wolfwireless
Member since Aug 2024
5828 posts
Posted on 9/5/26 at 4:12 pm to
quote:


Anecdotally, I know a few guys who have been shocked that their female partners don’t fully share their opinion on Clancy's culpability. This has likely been very eye opening for many people in our country.

It's been an eye opener for a few when they've found out they've been kicked to the curb over the side they took.
On both sides of the gender aisle.
Posted by Wolfwireless
Member since Aug 2024
5828 posts
Posted on 9/5/26 at 4:16 pm to
The only thing that will set back the first female president is TOO BIG TO RIG!! And secure election integrity.

Are many people....actual people less likely to vote for a femme president now? I'd say some are.

Me? No. Makes no difference. Leadership is man's business.
This post was edited on 9/5/26 at 4:17 pm
Posted by FATBOY TIGER
Valhalla
Member since Jan 2016
13973 posts
Posted on 9/5/26 at 4:19 pm to
Kitchen and the bedroom Wezzie.
Posted by Ailsa
Member since May 2020
12257 posts
Posted on 9/5/26 at 4:21 pm to
quote:

Prior to 1975 women had to volunteer to be put on a jury. After the court ruling, women didn't have to volunteer, they could automatically be put on the jury list.
This post was edited on 9/5/26 at 4:23 pm
Posted by SouthEasternKaiju
SouthEast... you figure it out
Member since Aug 2021
49894 posts
Posted on 9/5/26 at 4:22 pm to
Forever in this country.
This post was edited on 9/5/26 at 4:23 pm
Posted by UtahCajun
Member since Jul 2021
7661 posts
Posted on 9/5/26 at 4:23 pm to
quote:

Me? No. Makes no difference. Leadership is man's business

Thatcher was more manly than most Brit men
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram