
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Greenland Deal: not done
Posted on 9/19/26 at 12:52 pm to RobbBobb
Posted on 9/19/26 at 12:52 pm to RobbBobb
quote:
Its IvoryBill. Hes desperately seeking attention
After Trumps 1st term he became a Bernie Bro. Which tells you hes lying about supporting Trump. You simply dont go from socialism to American populism in a single election cycle
You're such a liar. I wasted a long comment responding to you. I have supported Trump in all three general elections.
I thought the Uniparty stranglehold had to be destroyed. I'm a libertarian ideologically, but Bernie seemed the best chance to blow things up. When he supported Hillary Clinton, he was dead to me. Of course, that was BEFORE Trump's first term.
This thread was just to point out that the Greenland deal had to be ratified by the Danish Parliament. Why is that Anti-Trump?
Posted on 9/19/26 at 2:16 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
Danish politicians aren't inclined to approve anything that benefits the US too much.
You don’t think this deal benefits the Danes? …. tell us why?
Posted on 9/19/26 at 2:39 pm to cadillacattack
quote:
You don’t think this deal benefits the Danes? …. tell us why?
I think it must benefit them. People were losing their minds about how we "own Greenland" now. I was just pointing out if it is a lopsided deal in favor of us, the Danish Parliament won't ratify it.
Posted on 9/19/26 at 2:41 pm to Placekicker
quote:
Why didn’t you just post this in the “Greenland is ours” thread that you were already in?
I'm glad he made the thread, I didn't read all of the other thread.
Posted on 9/19/26 at 2:57 pm to IvoryBillMatt
The Democrat, Poli Board mid term campaign must have cost a lot. Never seen this many tards here
Posted on 9/19/26 at 2:57 pm to IvoryBillMatt
Do you suck your thumb and cry yourself to sleep every night because of Trump's success?
Posted on 9/19/26 at 2:58 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
IvoryBillMatt
Keep us posted on the play by play. You the man!
This post was edited on 9/19/26 at 2:59 pm
Posted on 9/19/26 at 3:11 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
The deal has to be ratified by the Danish Parliament (simple majority vote). After all the insults, Danish politicians aren't inclined to approve anything that benefits the US too much.
Keep hope alive!
Posted on 9/19/26 at 3:13 pm to Ailsa
Then we need to show Denmark special love going forward. Maybe we can get them to veto Canada's ascension into the EU.
Posted on 9/19/26 at 3:15 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
There are downsides to practicing diplomacy through Truth Social declarations.
There are downsides to constantly being opposed to any actions taken by our president that has turned the worlds globalist (socialist) economic system which has eroded America's capacity to remain dominant.
I don't expect you to agree nor understand.....
Posted on 9/19/26 at 3:16 pm to RohanGonzales
quote:
The New York Times looked at a Greenland lockup and called it a shortfall because Trump didn’t get “total control.” Same story. Same reporters. Then they typed out a fat stack of American power and pretended the adjective saved them.
Read the shite they published.
Bigger U.S. military presence.
Harder basing.
Overflight.
Adversarial countries blocked from bases and from sensitive investment.
The arrangement built to survive Greenlandic independence.
Denmark keeps the flag.
Reuters ran the same core terms. Permanent. Unconditional. Danish sovereignty still on the paper. The Times still sold it as the President missing.
That gap is the whole racket.
Childers smashed it into one line: the bases, the ban, the veto, and forever. The exact reach of any unilateral U.S. investment veto was sloppy in the first public dump. Fine. The package still does the job that started this fight. Washington grabbed the strategic meat of the Greenland push and left the deed on Copenhagen’s desk.
“Did he get Greenland?” is a stupid question designed to hide the map. The United States gets a freer military hand in the Arctic. Tighter insulation against Russian and Chinese penetration. Continuity if Nuuk ever walks. Reuters says the deal is meant to last with no off-switch while Denmark keeps sovereignty.
The headline screams what he failed to annex. The body catalogs what he took. The strongest evidence against their “failure” sermon is sitting in their own goddamn copy, grinning at them.
(article below)
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. 
Posted on 9/19/26 at 3:34 pm to Ailsa
quote:
The deal is done.
Quote Facebook all you want. Here's what the official release from the Danish Prime Minister says:
"The three governments are expected to sign the agreement next week in connection with the UN General Assembly. Once the agreement is signed, it will have to go through the necessary parliamentary procedures to enter into force."
Kingdom of Denmark - Press Release
1. The deal hasn't been signed. Trump makes a practice of throwing in last-minute conditions. (See Saudi Nuclear Deal)
2. The Danish Parliament will have to ratify whatever deal is reached. The"procedures" vary according to what's actually in the deal...which apparently hasn't even been disclosed to the Parliament yet.
Posted on 9/19/26 at 3:44 pm to Bobby OG Johnson
It sounds like a great deal. I hope it gets ratified by the Danish Parliament.
Posted on 9/19/26 at 3:58 pm to lake chuck fan
quote:
There are downsides to constantly being opposed to any actions taken by our president that has turned the worlds globalist (socialist) economic system which has eroded America's capacity to remain dominant.
What are you talking about? I have continually complimented President Trump for tackling problems that no other president would have.
That's the main reason I think he's the best president of my lifetime. As part of his salesman personality, he frequently exaggerates. I thought everyone knew that.
The deal sounds great. Unless and until the Danish Parliament approves it, it's not binding.
Posted on 9/19/26 at 3:59 pm to IvoryBillMatt
Don’t try to hide your excitement.
Posted on 9/19/26 at 8:15 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
I have supported Trump in all three general elections
Your past post history doesnt support that
You were a Bernie Bros until he sold out to Hildebeast. Which means you would have openly welcomed socialism, had he won
This thread is another example of you being disingenuous. The deal is done. It is to be signed Mon or Tues at the UN.
quote:
The deal is set to be signed at the UN
After Trump's announcement, the office of Denmark's Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen said the deal will be signed next week at the United Nations General Assembly. "Next week could be a good week … for Greenland, Denmark, and the United States alike," Danish Foreign Minister Lars Løkke Rasmussen wrote on Instagram on Saturday morning.
Greenland's government leader Jens-Frederik Nielsen said the deal would benefit "not only our collective security, but also the continued development here in the country."
"A period of uncertainty will hopefully be replaced by a binding agreement that strengthens security in the Arctic and the North Atlantic — and thus also our shared security within NATO and Europe," he added.
Posted on 9/19/26 at 10:47 pm to RobbBobb
quote:
This thread is another example of you being disingenuous. The deal is done. It is to be signed Mon or Tues at the UN.
The Canada-US deal was also going to be signed. It wasn't.
More important, whatever gets signed in NY won't take effect unless the Danish Parliament ratifies it. Why is this a hard concept?
The deal is not done. It probably will get done. If it's what has been described, apparently the Danish Parliament will ratify it (why wouldn't they?)...but the members who I heard hadn't even seen the alleged agreement.
Posted on 9/21/26 at 5:52 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
The Canada-US deal was also going to be signed. It wasn't.
Canada was negotiating in bad faith. Denmark sounds excited about it
quote:
Deal to be signed at UN General Assembly in New York on Tuesday
The agreement, to be signed ?at the UN General Assembly in New York at 10:30 a.m. ET (1430 GMT) on Tuesday, has not been made public. President Donald Trump says it grants the US "permanent control". Denmark and Greenland have said the deal will benefit the Arctic island and respect its sovereignty.
Posted on 9/21/26 at 6:04 pm to RobbBobb
quote:
Canada was negotiating in bad faith. Denmark sounds excited about it
Don't know if Canada was in bad faith, but I agree that even with the passage of time, Denmark sounds excited about whatever the deal is.
I haven't heard much opposition to it from Denmark. It looks like it will go through.

Popular
Back to top


1












