- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Grand Jury Refuses to Indict Letitia James For Mortgage Fraud
Posted on 12/4/25 at 5:37 pm to Nosevens
Posted on 12/4/25 at 5:37 pm to Nosevens
quote:
Can’t they still prosecute without a grand jury indictment ?
No.
But they can bring it before the GJ again. Jeopardy does not attach at GJ proceedings.
1
Posted on 12/4/25 at 5:38 pm to lake chuck fan
Two sets of rules in this nation and I will
No longer fund this government.
No longer fund this government.
Posted on 12/4/25 at 5:39 pm to Nosevens
No, but they can amend the indictment and get the bitch on lesser charges.
...which is what they'll do.
...which is what they'll do.
Posted on 12/4/25 at 5:40 pm to lake chuck fan
what the frick
Posted on 12/4/25 at 5:55 pm to JimEverett
quote:
quote:
Can’t they still prosecute without a grand jury indictment ?
No.
But they can bring it before the GJ again. Jeopardy does not attach at GJ proceedings
Whats strange is that a Grand Jury previously agreed to indict, but now... they say no.
I understand that it's a Democrat cest pool of people around that area.... but still
Posted on 12/4/25 at 5:56 pm to lake chuck fan
So far not a single person in this thread has even entertained the option that the foreign trolls they follow on Twitter maybe have lied to them. She didn't break any laws.
Posted on 12/4/25 at 6:00 pm to lake chuck fan
There appears to have been some disagreement about charging Comey in the same office. Was there disagreement about this case? Did the prosecutor not "sufficiently invest" herself in this case?
Just speculating - but the information that is out there made it clear she lied. Seems weird a GJ would not indict.
Just speculating - but the information that is out there made it clear she lied. Seems weird a GJ would not indict.
Posted on 12/4/25 at 6:00 pm to lake chuck fan
The real mortgage fraudsters are still out there somewhere
Posted on 12/4/25 at 6:03 pm to lake chuck fan
Corruption on display again. People better wake up, these scumbags are at war with the U.S.
Posted on 12/4/25 at 6:05 pm to lake chuck fan
Most on this board would be indicted by a federal grand jury in Norfolk, Virginia for any contrived charge.
Something has to be done about this two tier justice system. When the dems get back in power, there will be no Trump to pardon the innocent.
Something has to be done about this two tier justice system. When the dems get back in power, there will be no Trump to pardon the innocent.
Posted on 12/4/25 at 6:09 pm to lake chuck fan
quote:
Whats strange is that a Grand Jury previously agreed to indict, but now... they say no.
They barely agreed to indict when presented evidence from an insurance lawyer with no experience with prosecuting people or with grand juries and Noone to assist her. She likely broke tons of rules like she did on the comey grand jury indictment.
These might be experienced lawyers who aren't willing to lie and violate people's rights for trump.
Posted on 12/4/25 at 6:11 pm to lake chuck fan
Getting justice in blue areas is going to be very difficult.
Posted on 12/4/25 at 6:14 pm to TrueTiger
I guess she is above the law.
Posted on 12/4/25 at 6:17 pm to FooManChoo
quote:
hope she repents of her sins and puts her trust in Jesus for forgiveness and eternal life, otherwise her sins will find her out and she will be judged for them by the King of kings.
a new flavor of copium 
Posted on 12/4/25 at 6:44 pm to lake chuck fan
Need a venue change
Posted on 12/4/25 at 7:14 pm to JimEverett
quote:
Did the prosecutor not "sufficiently invest" herself in this case?
Just speculating - but the information that is out there made it clear she lied. Seems weird a GJ would not indict.
I've sat on a federal grand jury and regardless of political affiliation, gender or skin color, people were voting to indict if the feds were bringing sufficient evidence. You only need 12 of the 16 to 24 people to indict.
Posted on 12/4/25 at 7:18 pm to lake chuck fan
Lol no shite. Are you fricking shocked?
Posted on 12/4/25 at 7:19 pm to lake chuck fan
SlowLetitiaPro will be along shortly to tell you it was frivolous!
Posted on 12/4/25 at 7:27 pm to RedStickFox
quote:
These might be experienced lawyers who aren't willing to lie and violate people's rights for trump.
Or...hear me out.... the lawyer presenting the evidence to the grand jury might not want her to be indicted and the secret proceeding might not have had sufficient evidence presented.
Admittedly, I do not have a clue how it went down but if the original person with almost zero criminal law experience got an indictment and...based on what has been presented (at least to my knowledge), it appears she did misrepresent...at a minimum...
Posted on 12/4/25 at 7:33 pm to TrueTiger
Blue areas?
Zero chance.
Zero chance.
Page 2 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News