- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Go on record: for or against bombing In Syria
Posted on 4/13/18 at 10:26 pm to windshieldman
Posted on 4/13/18 at 10:26 pm to windshieldman
Idiot.
Posted on 4/13/18 at 10:27 pm to idlewatcher
quote:None whatsoever.
What action, if any, would be warranted in your view?
There are no good guys in Syria. Choosing the lesser of multiple evils is a fool's game.
Posted on 4/13/18 at 10:28 pm to BBONDS25
For...especially since we are not alone this time with the UK and France have finally got skin in the game...
Posted on 4/13/18 at 10:30 pm to idlewatcher
quote:
What action, if any, would be warranted in your view?
None. What business is it of ours? This does nothing but waste our tax dollars.
Posted on 4/13/18 at 10:30 pm to LSURulzSEC
quote:
For...especially since we are not alone this time with the UK and France have finally got skin in the game...
Yes because those two countries definitely have their shite together.
Posted on 4/13/18 at 10:32 pm to BBONDS25
I'm still trying to catch up on what's happening. Assad/Russia used chemical weapons on Syrians and now we retaliate? Is this still about the pipeline?
Posted on 4/13/18 at 10:33 pm to BBONDS25
For
Hope we drop a few on Iran while we're all tuned up
Hope we drop a few on Iran while we're all tuned up
Posted on 4/13/18 at 10:34 pm to 4LSU2
quote:
If you pussies don’t stand for something, you fall for anything. America now has a leader that is not a pussy. We are the greatest nation on earth and it is time the world revered this.
You sound like the kind of person who would support a war with Canada if our government told us they were a threat.
Posted on 4/13/18 at 10:40 pm to Srbtiger06
quote:
Yes because those two countries definitely have their shite together.
name me one country that has their shite together completely?
That's right there are none, but people are always bitching about why we do things alone instead of having a coalition of allies, now we have two old allies involved with us this time and people like you want to bitch...
Posted on 4/13/18 at 10:40 pm to Old Money
Against.
But if we are going to do it, effective surgical strikes with without getting any Americans killed is the way to do it. Bonus points for getting France and England on board.
But if we are going to do it, effective surgical strikes with without getting any Americans killed is the way to do it. Bonus points for getting France and England on board.
Posted on 4/13/18 at 10:40 pm to BBONDS25
I'm fine with this limited and targeted airstrike. Sometimes a quick and decisive move is the best way to prevent other situations from escalating, especially given the nature of the attack we are responding to.
This post was edited on 4/14/18 at 12:41 am
Posted on 4/13/18 at 10:45 pm to BBONDS25
Against, it's just another Obama created proxy war to fight Russia without actually fighting Russia. Wasting billions of dollars and American lives in wasted attempt to have a second Iraq
Posted on 4/13/18 at 10:47 pm to BBONDS25
I'm against it.
5,000 american lives and several trillion dollars later in the mideast and we still have not learned our lesson.
5,000 american lives and several trillion dollars later in the mideast and we still have not learned our lesson.
Popular
Back to top


0









