Started By
Message
locked post

Fox with Breaking News: Comey's 1st draft of exoneration letter for Clinton

Posted on 12/14/17 at 4:35 pm
Posted by Cali 4 LSU
GEAUX TIGERS!
Member since Sep 2007
6507 posts
Posted on 12/14/17 at 4:35 pm
now in the hands of Catherine Herridge. Two points:

1. "Grossly negligent" was removed twice & replaced with "extremely careless"...softening the terminology.

2. Other Key thing: they made a change from "likely" that a hostile foreign actor(s) penetrated Clinton's server. They said it is reasonably likely that hostile actors gained accessed but Comey downgraded public statement to "possible".

Just FYI
Posted by Seldom Seen
Member since Feb 2016
39990 posts
Posted on 12/14/17 at 4:36 pm to
Just Lock Her Up already! Comey too!
Posted by Bunyan
He/Him
Member since Oct 2016
20828 posts
Posted on 12/14/17 at 4:37 pm to
Lock them both up!
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 12/14/17 at 4:39 pm to
comey better get some curtains to match his suit...they coming to take him to the pokey
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
118681 posts
Posted on 12/14/17 at 4:42 pm to
quote:

1. "Grossly negligent" was removed twice & replaced with "extremely careless"...softening the terminology.


Sounds like someone from the Clinton cabal called up Comey and threatened his arse. He had to downgrade the language to not allow indictment and to save his own life from suicide.

quote:

2. Other Key thing: they made a change from "likely" that a hostile foreign actor(s) penetrated Clinton's server. They said it is reasonably likely that hostile actors gained accessed but Comey downgraded public statement to "possible".


So it went from a 80% chance to a 25% chance that hostile actors gained access to her server. Does the level of chance of gaining access really matter? The only level that should matter is 0%. She still put national security at risk.
Posted by Green Chili Tiger
Lurking the Tin Foil Hat Board
Member since Jul 2009
47589 posts
Posted on 12/14/17 at 4:43 pm to
quote:

penetrated Clinton


Posted by The Baker
This is fine.
Member since Dec 2011
16160 posts
Posted on 12/14/17 at 4:46 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 1/10/21 at 6:09 pm
Posted by Tridentds
Sugar Land
Member since Aug 2011
20340 posts
Posted on 12/14/17 at 4:47 pm to
At this point this is much more about the corruption and collusion at the FBI than about Hillary.

No longer a separation of powers and this is a real problem for all Americans. Forget Hillary and Trump for a moment, the politics and stuff going on in the FBI is actually quite a problem for a democracy. This is on a similar level as the IRS targeting conservative groups.

Do we want the FBI, DOJ, IRS, etc... doing this kind of shite?
Posted by Crimson Wraith
Member since Jan 2014
24724 posts
Posted on 12/14/17 at 4:49 pm to
Perp walk all of them.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
123782 posts
Posted on 12/14/17 at 4:53 pm to
quote:

now in the hands of Catherine Herridge. Two points:

1. "Grossly negligent" was removed twice & replaced with "extremely careless"...softening the terminology.

2. Other Key thing: they made a change from "likely" that a hostile foreign actor(s) penetrated Clinton's server. They said it is reasonably likely that hostile actors gained accessed but Comey downgraded public statement to "possible".
Those things did not change themselves.
The salient and perhaps criminal question is how/why the changes occurred, and whether Strzok had a hands on role in the process.
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
94870 posts
Posted on 12/14/17 at 4:55 pm to
No, we don’t want IRS, DOJ, FBI, etc doing this shite which is why examples need to be made.

McCabe, Szrok, and Page may swing from yardarms for treason if the texts are true and they conspired to take down the president.

Doing so should make the various agency employees think twice about undermining the boss. We don’t want a situation like Pakistan here where the ISI (intelligence agency) is not accountable to anyone and does what it damn well pleases.
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
146563 posts
Posted on 12/14/17 at 4:58 pm to
quote:

"Grossly negligent" was removed twice
I looked the OP article up and the first hit was a youtube of ERIC HOLDER saying what Comey did was a good thing he did it in good faith
Posted by Homesick Tiger
Greenbrier, AR
Member since Nov 2006
54202 posts
Posted on 12/14/17 at 4:58 pm to
I heard some idiot lefty on FOX this morning saying Clinton is an ex SoS so she she be forgiven and we should move on.
Posted by FlatLakeTiger
New Orleans
Member since Nov 2015
2612 posts
Posted on 12/14/17 at 4:59 pm to
I think of Comey as a Tain't. I'm not sure if he's a pompous arse or just a huge gash. Either way, he is no honorable patriot.

BTW, neither is Mueller.

Both can kiss my white southern arse.
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
134845 posts
Posted on 12/14/17 at 4:59 pm to
Nothing will happen with this and nothing will change
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
146563 posts
Posted on 12/14/17 at 5:01 pm to
hush your whore mouth Imma beat yo arse
Posted by Prince_Hakeem
NavyTiger74 is my alter
Member since Dec 2017
238 posts
Posted on 12/14/17 at 5:02 pm to
Has there ever been an AG that’s as political as Eric Holder? Thinking maybe Bobby Kennedy but I think Holder has him licked.
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
134845 posts
Posted on 12/14/17 at 5:02 pm to
If you believe anything will change, I've got some great investments I'd like to talk to you about.
Posted by OTIS2
NoLA
Member since Jul 2008
50092 posts
Posted on 12/14/17 at 5:05 pm to
quote:

She still put national security at risk.


Anybody still remember the poor Iranian scientist that got whacked after this? Besides his family, I mean...
This post was edited on 12/14/17 at 5:08 pm
Posted by ABearsFanNMS
Formerly of tLandmass now in Texas
Member since Oct 2014
17446 posts
Posted on 12/14/17 at 5:05 pm to
quote:

So it went from a 80% chance to a 25% chance that hostile actors gained access to her server. Does the level of chance of gaining access really matter? The only level that should matter is 0%. She still put national security at risk.


What is sad there are military members (too include General Officers) thta have been convicted for far less serious infractions!
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram