- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Fox with Breaking News: Comey's 1st draft of exoneration letter for Clinton
Posted on 12/14/17 at 4:35 pm
Posted on 12/14/17 at 4:35 pm
now in the hands of Catherine Herridge. Two points:
1. "Grossly negligent" was removed twice & replaced with "extremely careless"...softening the terminology.
2. Other Key thing: they made a change from "likely" that a hostile foreign actor(s) penetrated Clinton's server. They said it is reasonably likely that hostile actors gained accessed but Comey downgraded public statement to "possible".
Just FYI
1. "Grossly negligent" was removed twice & replaced with "extremely careless"...softening the terminology.
2. Other Key thing: they made a change from "likely" that a hostile foreign actor(s) penetrated Clinton's server. They said it is reasonably likely that hostile actors gained accessed but Comey downgraded public statement to "possible".
Just FYI
Posted on 12/14/17 at 4:36 pm to Cali 4 LSU
Just Lock Her Up already! Comey too!
Posted on 12/14/17 at 4:39 pm to Cali 4 LSU
comey better get some curtains to match his suit...they coming to take him to the pokey
Posted on 12/14/17 at 4:42 pm to Cali 4 LSU
quote:
1. "Grossly negligent" was removed twice & replaced with "extremely careless"...softening the terminology.
Sounds like someone from the Clinton cabal called up Comey and threatened his arse. He had to downgrade the language to not allow indictment and to save his own life from suicide.
quote:
2. Other Key thing: they made a change from "likely" that a hostile foreign actor(s) penetrated Clinton's server. They said it is reasonably likely that hostile actors gained accessed but Comey downgraded public statement to "possible".
So it went from a 80% chance to a 25% chance that hostile actors gained access to her server. Does the level of chance of gaining access really matter? The only level that should matter is 0%. She still put national security at risk.
Posted on 12/14/17 at 4:43 pm to Cali 4 LSU
quote:
penetrated Clinton
Posted on 12/14/17 at 4:46 pm to GumboPot
(no message)
This post was edited on 1/10/21 at 6:09 pm
Posted on 12/14/17 at 4:47 pm to Cali 4 LSU
At this point this is much more about the corruption and collusion at the FBI than about Hillary.
No longer a separation of powers and this is a real problem for all Americans. Forget Hillary and Trump for a moment, the politics and stuff going on in the FBI is actually quite a problem for a democracy. This is on a similar level as the IRS targeting conservative groups.
Do we want the FBI, DOJ, IRS, etc... doing this kind of shite?
No longer a separation of powers and this is a real problem for all Americans. Forget Hillary and Trump for a moment, the politics and stuff going on in the FBI is actually quite a problem for a democracy. This is on a similar level as the IRS targeting conservative groups.
Do we want the FBI, DOJ, IRS, etc... doing this kind of shite?
Posted on 12/14/17 at 4:49 pm to Cali 4 LSU
Perp walk all of them.
Posted on 12/14/17 at 4:53 pm to Cali 4 LSU
quote:Those things did not change themselves.
now in the hands of Catherine Herridge. Two points:
1. "Grossly negligent" was removed twice & replaced with "extremely careless"...softening the terminology.
2. Other Key thing: they made a change from "likely" that a hostile foreign actor(s) penetrated Clinton's server. They said it is reasonably likely that hostile actors gained accessed but Comey downgraded public statement to "possible".
The salient and perhaps criminal question is how/why the changes occurred, and whether Strzok had a hands on role in the process.
Posted on 12/14/17 at 4:55 pm to Tridentds
No, we don’t want IRS, DOJ, FBI, etc doing this shite which is why examples need to be made.
McCabe, Szrok, and Page may swing from yardarms for treason if the texts are true and they conspired to take down the president.
Doing so should make the various agency employees think twice about undermining the boss. We don’t want a situation like Pakistan here where the ISI (intelligence agency) is not accountable to anyone and does what it damn well pleases.
McCabe, Szrok, and Page may swing from yardarms for treason if the texts are true and they conspired to take down the president.
Doing so should make the various agency employees think twice about undermining the boss. We don’t want a situation like Pakistan here where the ISI (intelligence agency) is not accountable to anyone and does what it damn well pleases.
Posted on 12/14/17 at 4:58 pm to Cali 4 LSU
quote:I looked the OP article up and the first hit was a youtube of ERIC HOLDER saying what Comey did was a good thing he did it in good faith
"Grossly negligent" was removed twice
Posted on 12/14/17 at 4:58 pm to NC_Tigah
I heard some idiot lefty on FOX this morning saying Clinton is an ex SoS so she she be forgiven and we should move on.
Posted on 12/14/17 at 4:59 pm to Cali 4 LSU
I think of Comey as a Tain't. I'm not sure if he's a pompous arse or just a huge gash. Either way, he is no honorable patriot.
BTW, neither is Mueller.
Both can kiss my white southern arse.
BTW, neither is Mueller.
Both can kiss my white southern arse.
Posted on 12/14/17 at 4:59 pm to Cali 4 LSU
Nothing will happen with this and nothing will change
Posted on 12/14/17 at 5:01 pm to upgrayedd
hush your whore mouth Imma beat yo arse
Posted on 12/14/17 at 5:02 pm to cajunangelle
Has there ever been an AG that’s as political as Eric Holder? Thinking maybe Bobby Kennedy but I think Holder has him licked.
Posted on 12/14/17 at 5:02 pm to cajunangelle
If you believe anything will change, I've got some great investments I'd like to talk to you about.
Posted on 12/14/17 at 5:05 pm to GumboPot
quote:
She still put national security at risk.
Anybody still remember the poor Iranian scientist that got whacked after this? Besides his family, I mean...
This post was edited on 12/14/17 at 5:08 pm
Posted on 12/14/17 at 5:05 pm to GumboPot
quote:
So it went from a 80% chance to a 25% chance that hostile actors gained access to her server. Does the level of chance of gaining access really matter? The only level that should matter is 0%. She still put national security at risk.
What is sad there are military members (too include General Officers) thta have been convicted for far less serious infractions!
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News