- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Fourth Circuit Judges Block Trump from Firing 19 DEI Intelligence Officers
Posted on 7/2/26 at 1:27 pm to HurricaneTiger
Posted on 7/2/26 at 1:27 pm to HurricaneTiger
quote:
I mean, didn’t they just rule on this?
Actually, I believe SCOTUS said that he can fire individuals who work at independent agencies. It would seem that he would have even more authority to fire people within the Executive Branch.
Posted on 7/2/26 at 1:30 pm to cajunangelle
It's really simple...just ignore the bastards
Posted on 7/2/26 at 1:38 pm to cajunangelle
Definitely owns a couple double sided dildos and it isn’t for her girlfriend.
Posted on 7/2/26 at 1:44 pm to jizzle6609
One of these judges was the first transgender judge appointed, Phyllis Frye.
Posted on 7/2/26 at 1:45 pm to hogcard1964
quote:
Yes they do.
Well, I gave you an example that is analogous to this one, but I can’t beat the unassailable logic of a naked “Yes they do.”
Posted on 7/2/26 at 1:45 pm to cajunangelle
There are like 3 different looks for these whack job liberal judges. I mean they all fit into one of these:
1. Lesbo white woman
2. Scrawny cyclist white dude with bad teeth and thick glasses
3. other
1. Lesbo white woman
2. Scrawny cyclist white dude with bad teeth and thick glasses
3. other
This post was edited on 7/2/26 at 1:47 pm
Posted on 7/2/26 at 1:48 pm to cajunangelle
Who is the commander in chief?
Posted on 7/2/26 at 1:52 pm to cajunangelle
quote:
Two Democratic-appointed judges on the U.S. Court of Appeals
They’re all just lined up, waiting their turn. Too bad SCOTUS has already weighed in on this very thing.
Posted on 7/2/26 at 1:52 pm to ReauxlTide222
quote:
Slow, this might be lawfare
He must be in court right now
Posted on 7/2/26 at 1:55 pm to ReauxlTide222
BuT wHaT iS the cRiTerIa fOr lAwfaRe?
Posted on 7/2/26 at 2:05 pm to cajunangelle
"okay agents-you being transfered to Northern Alaska.
We need you there in 2 weeks"
We need you there in 2 weeks"
Posted on 7/2/26 at 2:32 pm to the808bass
quote:He has picked the most peculiar term to use in this crusade. As if we can’t come up with and assign meaning to words as time passes.
BuT wHaT iS the cRiTerIa fOr lAwfaRe?
Nobody is confused about what lawfare means. One could easily argue that something isn’t lawfare. But we all know what it means.
Except Slow.
I think it’s a tactic to avoid having to discuss certain topics. Similar to “that’s not the exact topic of the OP so I won’t be responding to your point.” He loves that one. The issue is he doesn’t hold himself to the same account.
Posted on 7/2/26 at 2:44 pm to cajunangelle
Well they can always use them to wash government cars and trucks.
Posted on 7/2/26 at 2:59 pm to Penrod
quote:
Well, I gave you an example that is analogous to this one, but I can’t beat the unassailable logic of a naked “Yes they do.”
Failure to detain illegal invaders (up to 30 million) and dismantling enforcement measures by re allocating border wall funds for other purposes.
He also enacted the eviction moratorium law during the covid fiasco after he was told it was illegal.
Posted on 7/2/26 at 3:07 pm to Penrod
quote:
No they don’t. Biden tried and tried to forgive student loans and the courts would not let him do it.
You’re such an intellectually dishonest hack. And guess what? He fricking did it anyway for many leeches
Posted on 7/2/26 at 3:16 pm to cajunangelle
There needs to be a scoreboard for judges and when you hit 3 rulings that end up being reversed, you're automatically fired.
Posted on 7/2/26 at 3:17 pm to Sweep Da Leg
quote:
You’re such an intellectually dishonest hack. And guess what? He fricking did it anyway for many leeches
He got a small amount done. Mainly, he was frustrated by the courts and eventually gave up.
Dishonest hack - Someone who disagrees with Hump Da Leg and is correct.
Posted on 7/2/26 at 4:17 pm to cajunangelle
This is not hard. Just load ‘em up with real duties! Use ‘em as real employees - they’ll quit soon enough. If they don’t quit soon enough - you can fire ‘em for cause. This is BS!!
Posted on 7/2/26 at 4:19 pm to cajunangelle
How the frick can a judge force the executive branch to hire or retain anybody?
That is bullshite. They're fired asses can sue all the way up to SCOTUS while they are unemployed.
That is bullshite. They're fired asses can sue all the way up to SCOTUS while they are unemployed.
Posted on 7/2/26 at 4:22 pm to cajunangelle
quote:
DEI Intelligence Officers
That’s a phrase I never expected to see.
Popular
Back to top



0







