- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Former federal prosecutor weighs in on the Epstein files & Bondi
Posted on 2/22/26 at 7:51 am to High Life
Posted on 2/22/26 at 7:51 am to High Life
quote:
It’s almost like they always end up dead first
Multiple women connected to Epstein have testified, some over 10 years ago.
The only one dead is VG and that was a legitimate suicide.
2
Posted on 2/22/26 at 7:53 am to CDUBTX
quote:
What’s true is the files are largely redacted and we all know there are videos and other evidence they’re not showing us. The whole thing is just stupid. What a gullible idiot.
What’s true is millions of unredacted files have also been released and if there is sexual abuse on video they aren’t going to show it to the public.
Posted on 2/22/26 at 7:55 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The only one dead is VG and that was a legitimate suicide.
And she said she was 17-20 when hanging with Prince Andrew.
I’m not saying what happened to her was right, but it also doesn’t rise to the level of satanic pedophile cult.
Posted on 2/22/26 at 7:57 am to dgnx6
quote:
but it also doesn’t rise to the level of satanic pedophile cult.
Correct, but you still have people claiming this all proved those theories, just like how Prince Andrew being arrested for financial crimes somehow proved those theories, or how the future prince (or whatever) of Norway getting arrested for sexual assaults in 2024 somehow proves the Epstein CTs.
They're all over the place and neither logic nor reality matter. Only the narrative and NPC talking points.
Posted on 2/22/26 at 8:02 am to idlewatcher
quote:
Good to know. Now release the videos from the vault and let’s see who should be prosecuted.
Better yet, let’s mask the other 3M files in a hush hush manner then blame “muh ongoing investigation”.
This guy didn't read the OP.
Posted on 2/22/26 at 8:02 am to hawgfaninc
quote:
It’s true we thought there would be more prosecutions.
Thinking there would be “more” than zero is not unreasonable.
Posted on 2/22/26 at 8:04 am to Meauxjeaux
I didn't even catch that when I first skimmed the post.
People who had followed the story didn't expect more arrests. Is it theoretically possible? Yes, but based on the evidence we had by the trial of Maxwell, it was unlikely. Certainly nothing to expect.
It's the people who didn't follow the actual stories, evidence, litigations, testimony, etc. and who listened to dishonest charlatans online who expected more.
People who had followed the story didn't expect more arrests. Is it theoretically possible? Yes, but based on the evidence we had by the trial of Maxwell, it was unlikely. Certainly nothing to expect.
It's the people who didn't follow the actual stories, evidence, litigations, testimony, etc. and who listened to dishonest charlatans online who expected more.
This post was edited on 2/22/26 at 8:05 am
Posted on 2/22/26 at 8:06 am to Meauxjeaux
quote:
Thinking there would be “more” than zero is not unreasonable.
Epstein and Maxwell = more than zero
Posted on 2/22/26 at 8:07 am to hawgfaninc
[quote]Just my $.02.[/quote
Yeah that is about what it is worth.
Yeah that is about what it is worth.
Posted on 2/22/26 at 8:07 am to imjustafatkid
quote:
Epstein and Maxwell = more than zero
The implication is they meant after those 2.
You know, this supposed network that is the basis of the conspiracy theory.
Posted on 2/22/26 at 8:13 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
You know, this supposed network that is the basis of the conspiracy theory.
There obviously was a network. If there is anything prosecutable, it won't be released publicly because that would harm that potential prosecution.
Posted on 2/22/26 at 8:27 am to imjustafatkid
quote:
There obviously was a networ
Of what, specifically?
Of a sex trafficking ring? SRA? There isn't any credible-direct evidence of this right now.
Posted on 2/22/26 at 8:51 am to Bass Tiger
quote:
I'll continue to say it.
The Epstein Sex Trafficking Scandal goes nowhere until credible witnesses comer forth with irrefutable evidence and they go under oath to testify....period.
That's not the dimtard way. They will wait twenty years and then trot out a fifty year old "victim" of Epstein to accuse a conservative nominated/running for office and claim all "victims" must be believed.
Posted on 2/22/26 at 9:56 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Of what, specifically?
Of people connected to Jeff Epstein.
Posted on 2/22/26 at 10:16 am to imjustafatkid
quote:
Of people connected to Jeff Epstein.
Well yeah everyone has a similar network.
Hence why my comment said this in its entirety
quote:
You know, this supposed network that is the basis of the conspiracy theory.
Network + CT, specifically the network exclusively around the CT.
Posted on 2/22/26 at 10:28 am to SlowFlowPro
Are we discussing Epsteins 40 years of working money, influence and transportation off grid (illegal) for the powerful and various ICs lol
Posted on 2/22/26 at 10:41 am to SlowFlowPro
How many cases like that have you prosecuted? Even YOU can't deny the whole things being used for political gain by both parties.
This post was edited on 2/22/26 at 10:43 am
Posted on 2/22/26 at 11:15 am to davyjones
That has nothing to do with what I said. How could we possibly know if there is a potential case when virtually everything. Important is redacted. And yes they told us there were thousands of videos. Your whole legal argument is ridiculous. It’s like having a video of a murder but we blur out who the murderer is and say well no case here because we can’t see who it is.
Posted on 2/22/26 at 11:31 am to hawgfaninc
Couldn’t this be prosecuted as a conspiracy case and isn’t the statute of limitations surrounding sex trafficking longer than 10 years?
Posted on 2/22/26 at 11:33 am to hawgfaninc
Believe all women is that how it goes
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News