- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 7/14/26 at 10:39 pm to midnight_chopper
quote:
I have asked this before and never gotten an answer. How is this different than what you need to fill out an I9 for employment?
If you have a DL and a social security card that is sufficient for I9
Posted on 7/14/26 at 10:43 pm to KCT
As I understand the situation, the big problems that I see with it are:
1. That the agencies to whom the documents are owed in order to verify eligibility to register to vote are supposedly incapable in many—if not most—smaller locales of actually verifying the authenticity of those documents. Because of what they are requiring, it gets complicated to verify depending on what documents you provide. Many government databases are not up to date, so you might simply not be found in them.
So eligible voters get turned away simply because their local DMV lacks the resources to successfully verify the authenticity of their documents, or you aren't found in some unkept government database.
And not just a few. Kansas is a test case because they passed a similar state law. 12% of all applicants were unable to register to vote because of this.
So it's legit a broken system out of the gate.
They could have avoided this by simply placing the burden on back end verification of easily verified documents that the DMV has pretty much universal access to.
But no, they had to outsmart themselves and frick it up, like always.
2. There are no clear guidelines for delivery of documents when registering online, which opens the door for abuse by frivolous denial of registration in locales with abusive intent.
3. Given the recent SCOTUS decision affirming mail in voting, the fact that the Act requires registration in person virtually guarantees a lawsuit before 2028 that will be fast tracked to SCOTUS. Someone will argue that the requirement to register in person violates the just-upheld ability to vote by mail. I doubt it would threaten the whole thing, but I guess it could.
Again, that's all according to my understanding, but that's my list of problems.
1. That the agencies to whom the documents are owed in order to verify eligibility to register to vote are supposedly incapable in many—if not most—smaller locales of actually verifying the authenticity of those documents. Because of what they are requiring, it gets complicated to verify depending on what documents you provide. Many government databases are not up to date, so you might simply not be found in them.
So eligible voters get turned away simply because their local DMV lacks the resources to successfully verify the authenticity of their documents, or you aren't found in some unkept government database.
And not just a few. Kansas is a test case because they passed a similar state law. 12% of all applicants were unable to register to vote because of this.
So it's legit a broken system out of the gate.
They could have avoided this by simply placing the burden on back end verification of easily verified documents that the DMV has pretty much universal access to.
But no, they had to outsmart themselves and frick it up, like always.
2. There are no clear guidelines for delivery of documents when registering online, which opens the door for abuse by frivolous denial of registration in locales with abusive intent.
3. Given the recent SCOTUS decision affirming mail in voting, the fact that the Act requires registration in person virtually guarantees a lawsuit before 2028 that will be fast tracked to SCOTUS. Someone will argue that the requirement to register in person violates the just-upheld ability to vote by mail. I doubt it would threaten the whole thing, but I guess it could.
Again, that's all according to my understanding, but that's my list of problems.
Posted on 7/14/26 at 10:48 pm to grich31
quote:
One of many but this is one of nonstarters, requiring folks to get a passport to vote is rediculous,
You even said yourself later in your post, that there are other options. Obtaining a birth certificate and a photo id is extremely easy.
If someone is capable of applying for any number of government benefits then they could easily obtain a BC and photo ID. If they can set up a phone plan or satellite tv service.Then again, they would also possess the necessary level of intelligence and effort to get the needed documents to vote.
Thousands of our young men have given there lives for us to have the ability to conduct legitimate elections but asking an average citizen to get some very easy to get documents is too much?
Posted on 7/14/26 at 10:51 pm to KCT
Those without ID will not able to vote and that includes almost all homeless.
Posted on 7/14/26 at 10:53 pm to Powerman
quote:
If you have a DL and a social security card that is sufficient for I9
True. So what you are saying is you are fine with a DL and Soc Sec card for I9 but a DL and a BC to REGISTER to vote is one step too far. Is there really that big a difference between getting a SS card or a BC. If you are ok with one, then why not the other.
Posted on 7/14/26 at 10:54 pm to Eurocat
And there’s nothing at all that speaks to the ability and capability of the homeless and such to have access to the process of getting an ID, cost free?? I’d be curious to know.
Posted on 7/14/26 at 10:55 pm to Powerman
It amazes me that you are this stupid. Is that a side affect of being a bottom?
Posted on 7/14/26 at 10:58 pm to Eurocat
quote:
Those without ID will not able to vote and that includes almost all homeless.
Boo…fricking…Hoo. How many homeless are actually voting anyways. I think I can live with a small percentage of homeless not getting to vote if it means a large percentage of illegals aren’t.
Posted on 7/14/26 at 10:59 pm to Eurocat
Hopefully they abstain from liquor and cigarettes and lotto tix and bar room and titty clubs and DNC Conventions too..
All are arguably bad for you and require proper ID.
Does obtaining an EBT card require an ID?
All are arguably bad for you and require proper ID.
Does obtaining an EBT card require an ID?
This post was edited on 7/14/26 at 11:02 pm
Posted on 7/14/26 at 11:01 pm to davyjones
A lot of the homeless have a bit of a problem getting organized and being in the right place at the right time. This legislation creates hurdles.
Posted on 7/14/26 at 11:02 pm to Kingshakabooboo
quote:
True. So what you are saying is you are fine with a DL and Soc Sec card for I9 but a DL and a BC to REGISTER to vote is one step too far. Is there really that big a difference between getting a SS card or a BC. If you are ok with one, then why not the other.
Dude, I have no idea where my birth certificate is. I'd have to somehow request a duplicate copy of it.
I have a passport so this wouldn't affect me but I'd imagine there are plenty of adults that don't have passports and plenty that also don't have quick access to their birth certificate. A driver's license alone is all that should be required. Adding more documents to it (especially ones without photos) proves that this whole thing is a sham and has nothing to do with integrity of elections. And I'm 100% in favor of being required to present a photo ID to vote.
Posted on 7/14/26 at 11:03 pm to Eurocat
quote:
A lot of the homeless have a bit of a problem getting organized and being in the right place at the right time. This legislation creates hurdles.
frick you. The homeless are homeless by choice or severe mental illness your ilk refuses to throw them in padded rooms for.
Posted on 7/14/26 at 11:11 pm to Kingshakabooboo
quote:
Obtaining a birth certificate and a photo id is extremely easy.
Getting a birth certificate is easy IF THEY HAVE YOU IN THEIR COMPUTER DATABASE. If they don't, you can still get one, but someone has to go down to the country records department and pull it on microfilm or paper.
The problem isn't getting one; it's the DMV or other election registration officials verify the authenticity of it once you present it to them (which is apparently a requirement of the bill).
If you're not in the computer database, you probably are just going to be out of luck. They aren't going to send someone from the DMV down to the country records office to pull out the microfilm every time someone shows up with a birth certificate that hasn't been entered into the country system yet. They'll just tell you that they can't verify it and they are sorry, but they can't register you to vote.
See above. This has already happened in Kansas. It kept 12% of applicants from being able to register.
Posted on 7/14/26 at 11:11 pm to Eurocat
quote:
A lot of the homeless have a bit of a problem getting organized and being in the right place at the right time. This legislation creates hurdles.
You’re really going that route, eh? The classic “they’re too dumb and handicapped to accomplish it” bit , eh? Shirley not.
This post was edited on 7/14/26 at 11:19 pm
Posted on 7/14/26 at 11:14 pm to Powerman
quote:
If a driver's license isn't sufficient then I can't get behind the legislation
Sorry, it's just stupid.
If that's what it takes to keep you from voting I am more in than ever. Let's get the Save Act PASSED!
Posted on 7/14/26 at 11:15 pm to wackatimesthree
quote:
If you're not in the computer database, you probably are just going to be out of luck. They aren't going to send someone from the DMV down to the country records office to pull out the microfilm every time someone shows up with a birth certificate that hasn't been entered into the country system yet. They'll just tell you that they can't verify it and they are sorry, but they can't register you to vote.
See above. This has already happened in Kansas. It kept 12% of applicants from being able to register.
If I had to find a copy of my birth certificate on short notice I'd be out of luck.
Thankfully I have a passport but not everyone has one. Barely over 50% of the adult population has passports.
Posted on 7/14/26 at 11:15 pm to Powerman
quote:
Adding more documents to it (especially ones without photos) proves that this whole thing is a sham and has nothing to do with integrity of elections.
I know that's a talking point you would cling to, but the data shows the opposite.
They've actually fricked this up in the other direction, by making it too complicated to verify, yet requiring point-of-issue verification.
Read my posts on the subject.
What they did is instead of putting the burden on the registeree, they put it on the election officials and required them to verify the authenticity of documents that they don't have the ability to verify in a significant percentage of cases.
That's not the action of someone who doesn't care about verification. It's the action of someone who DOES care, but is too dumb to anticipate the potential problems with it.
Posted on 7/14/26 at 11:16 pm to Powerman
quote:
If I had to find a copy of my birth certificate on short notice I'd be out of luck.
What kind of grown arse adult doesn’t know where their birth certificate is?
Posted on 7/14/26 at 11:17 pm to Powerman
quote:
If I had to find a copy of my birth certificate on short notice I'd be out of luck.
Yeah, you said that.
But you could get another one as long as you have a driver's license and roughly $50 for related fees (in my state, anyway). That isn't the hard part.
The potential hard part is election officials being able to verify it once you hand it to them.
This post was edited on 7/14/26 at 11:21 pm
Popular
Back to top


0




