Started By
Message

re: Flynn was unmasked 44 times by 30+ officials prior to Kislyak phone call

Posted on 5/13/20 at 3:13 pm to
Posted by joshnorris14
Florida
Member since Jan 2009
46671 posts
Posted on 5/13/20 at 3:13 pm to
quote:

The counter argument is that we have known that this was taking place for three years. And yet it’s taken the entire time to get concrete proof. And the replacement of dozens of department heads and directors.


It's not like the information wasn't there.

Dan Coats could've declassified this list at anytime.
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
138911 posts
Posted on 5/13/20 at 3:14 pm to
quote:

Then they use the "degrees of separation" rule to widen the net.



The two hop rule. LINK
Posted by jmcwhrter
Member since Nov 2012
7638 posts
Posted on 5/13/20 at 3:14 pm to
quote:

Correct. The unmasking in itself takes prior authorization which Biden obviously had. The part that is illegal is sharing that name with unauthorized people..leaking..


So assuming he wasn't the person who leaked it to the media, then the only real relevance of Biden's name being on there was that he lied yesterday when he said he had no idea what the Flynn stuff was about...?

It doesn't seem that far-fetched that some NSA employee would feel OK to unmask someone at the request of the vice president...
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
46029 posts
Posted on 5/13/20 at 3:14 pm to
My guess would be not having all of their eggs in one basket. Manafort was fired with the quickness. If Trump would have dumped Page, all would have been lost. Unmasking and NSA queries, at that point, had been stopped.
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
84411 posts
Posted on 5/13/20 at 3:16 pm to
Certainly plausible
Posted by Megasaurus
Member since Dec 2017
1334 posts
Posted on 5/13/20 at 3:16 pm to
quote:

And I never understood how Flynn connected to the Misfud/ PoppaD trap.


the only public writing I have seen that connects them has been Flynn's counsel trying to get Misfud's phone transcripts from DOJ. I dont recall reading any specifics on it either, I m not sure if there ever really was a connection there, sometimes its a good tactic-rock kicking- even if you dont have anything specific, just to see what turns up, sometimes you catch a break..dunno
Posted by gthog61
Irving, TX
Member since Nov 2009
71001 posts
Posted on 5/13/20 at 3:16 pm to
quote:

then the only real relevance of Biden's name being on there was that he lied yesterday when he said he had no idea what the Flynn stuff was about...?


Yep, mere lying is no problem for the dem party

Lying in such a bald faced manner makes Biden an all-star!
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
46029 posts
Posted on 5/13/20 at 3:16 pm to
No. I think what he's saying is that because prior authorization is required, there is no way Biden saw the report before requesting the unmasking.
Posted by jmcwhrter
Member since Nov 2012
7638 posts
Posted on 5/13/20 at 3:17 pm to
quote:

Yep, mere lying is no problem for the dem party

Lying in such a bald faced manner makes Biden an all-star!


So.. safe to assume that Joe will say he never actually looked at the unmasked info
Posted by Megasaurus
Member since Dec 2017
1334 posts
Posted on 5/13/20 at 3:23 pm to
So assuming he wasn't the person who leaked it to the media, then the only real relevance of Biden's name being on there was that he lied yesterday when he said he had no idea what the Flynn stuff was about...?


Correct. If we had an honest media, he would have to explain this which he cannot do because he was up to no good, he would be a proven liar.


It doesn't seem that far-fetched that some NSA employee would feel OK to unmask someone at the request of the vice president...

well, thats a different story and very easy to backtrack (paperwork is a really big deal with this) and that person that gets caught typically goes to prison for a long time
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
46029 posts
Posted on 5/13/20 at 3:28 pm to
quote:

doesn't seem that far-fetched that some NSA employee would feel OK to unmask someone at the request of the vice president...


Ah. The “rogue agent” defense. Somewhere, Lois Lerner’s ears are burning.
Posted by jmcwhrter
Member since Nov 2012
7638 posts
Posted on 5/13/20 at 3:39 pm to
I wonder if 30+ people requested unmasking to intentionally hide the eventual leaker
Posted by Jbird
In Bidenville with EthanL
Member since Oct 2012
83949 posts
Posted on 5/13/20 at 3:44 pm to
quote:

doesn't seem that far-fetched that some NSA employee would feel OK to unmask someone at the request of the vice president...



Ah. The “rogue agent” defense. Somewhere, Lois Lerner’s ears are burning.
Yep because middle tier guys get to make that determination.
Posted by Turbeauxdog
Member since Aug 2004
24080 posts
Posted on 5/13/20 at 3:48 pm to
quote:

Keystone Cops at the upper echelon of federal law enforcement


Comey and Rosenstein seem to fit this description.

The rest definitely seem more nefarious
Posted by trinidadtiger
Member since Jun 2017
18646 posts
Posted on 5/13/20 at 3:50 pm to
Back to the beginning. Rogers stated the legitimate process. After the actual process was reviewed and given to the court, the FISC stated that it was not being followed in 1000s of cases over many years. In fact, contractors working for the FBI were doing ask queries with no supervision.

The FISA warrants were all to cover up what had been going on for years, these illegal "ask queries".

All of this Flynn unmasking amounts to less than a 100 on one person, chum in the water. When Grenell does the data dump it will be 1000s and hundreds of people, of all shapes and sizes. it could be another Jaws miniseries with all the sharks fished out of the swamp.

The spin is that Flynn being unmasked is no biggie because they always monitor russian ambassadors. Its not the unmasking of those conversations, its the ask queries trying to dig up dirt on his personal life.
Posted by Wolfhound45
Member since Nov 2009
125811 posts
Posted on 5/13/20 at 3:51 pm to
quote:

Flynn was unmasked 44 times by 30+ officials prior to Kislyak phone call
Posted by trinidadtiger
Member since Jun 2017
18646 posts
Posted on 5/13/20 at 3:54 pm to
quote:

I believe they were cut off from the nsa databases on or near the summer of 2016, and had already moved onto the fisa warrants and had Halper poking aroung GP prior to the election. They were already past the point of no return by November.



True but then obama by decree removed the NSA as the gatekeeper and had all 17 Intel agencies/depts monitoring themselves when they accessed the data base. Slick move to really dig info on everyone before leaving.
Posted by Crimson1st
Birmingham, AL
Member since Nov 2010
20723 posts
Posted on 5/13/20 at 3:55 pm to
quote:

I saw Bidens name on the list . You mean to tell me he lied about not knowing anything about Flynn?


Come on...cut him some slack...I am sure he forgot about that already and didn't know he was lying. I mean it was a few years ago...sheesh! He struggles day to day nowadays.
This post was edited on 5/13/20 at 4:03 pm
Posted by GetmorewithLes
UK Basketball Fan
Member since Jan 2011
22168 posts
Posted on 5/13/20 at 4:00 pm to
quote:

Any names of American citizens would be redacted in the transcript of the intelligence.
.

And as I understand it this is by law to protect the civil rights of person for whom they do not have legal permission to wiretap.
Posted by Rebel
Graceland
Member since Jan 2005
141328 posts
Posted on 5/13/20 at 4:07 pm to
quote:

what happened on December 14th?


On Dec 14th Flynn made and deleted a tweet about Hillary and illegal sex ring.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram