- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 9/29/23 at 5:02 pm to Bulldogblitz
quote:
Someone took up the defense of human trafficking out of boredom or stupidity.
human trafficking? Surely there were arrests related to that. Right?
Yet, what I saw was Deputy Holly HotThighs dressed invitingly and wagged her posterior at drivers until one was attracted enough to pull over and see what the "deal" was. When she said the deal was only $80, he consented, was arrested ... AND HE WORKED AT DISNEY ...
.... SO LET'S RUIN HIS LIFE!
This post was edited on 9/29/23 at 5:05 pm
Posted on 9/29/23 at 5:05 pm to NC_Tigah
I told you last time we had this discussion this shite was called "human trafficking" these days.
I'm just glad we had a clear cut, no minors, entrapment-style "human trafficking" operation.
I'm just glad we had a clear cut, no minors, entrapment-style "human trafficking" operation.
Posted on 9/29/23 at 5:12 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:Indeed.
I told you last time we had this discussion this shite was called "human trafficking" these days.
I vaguely remember the convo. Subtle disagreements. I'd be appalled if I was defending anything remotely like this BS at that time.
Posted on 9/29/23 at 5:17 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
I'd be appalled if I was defending anything remotely like this BS at that time.
You were not, but it took a while until I explained, basically this scenario, was now "human trafficking".
I am happy this tactile example occurred.
Posted on 9/29/23 at 5:30 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:Ah, now I remember. Yep. I get it.
I explained, basically this scenario, was now "human trafficking".
Posted on 9/29/23 at 5:43 pm to thebigmuffaletta
Cover them in kerosene and burn them alive!.
Posted on 9/29/23 at 5:56 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
But thanks for confirming you can't read.
And thanks again for confirming once again you are lying asshat!
Posted on 9/29/23 at 5:57 pm to Toomer Deplorable
quote:
Human trafficking is primarily forced labor.
Human trafficking primarily occurs nowhere near the US.
What's your issue with those statements
Posted on 9/29/23 at 6:00 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Just read this thread with all the guys trying to irrationally insert pedophilia and child sex trafficking into the discussion. It's a real time display of how their minds have been completely warped by succumbing to propaganda.
Just read this thread to see how SFP is a disingenuous lying sack-of-sh*+!
This post was edited on 9/29/23 at 8:57 pm
Posted on 9/29/23 at 6:12 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Human trafficking is primarily forced labor.
Human trafficking primarily occurs nowhere near the US.
That isn’t what you said. You said this:
quote:
Yet here it is — the goal post shift — following the script exactly!
This post was edited on 9/29/23 at 8:27 pm
Posted on 9/29/23 at 6:29 pm to Toomer Deplorable
Litearlly waht I said.
I said human trafficking is primarily:
1. forced labor
2. nowhere near the US
Nowhere in that statement does it say that human trafficking doesn't exist in the US, or any of the other strawmen stated ITT.
I said human trafficking is primarily:
1. forced labor
2. nowhere near the US
Nowhere in that statement does it say that human trafficking doesn't exist in the US, or any of the other strawmen stated ITT.
Posted on 9/29/23 at 6:30 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
Yet, what I saw was Deputy Holly HotThighs dressed invitingly and wagged her posterior at drivers until one was attracted enough to pull over and see what the "deal" was
This was more likely to be done mostly online
They post an ad
Johns show up, and get busted
They are also responding to ads
Cop responds to ad from ho
Ho shows up
They bust her, and her pimp (if applicable)
Hundreds nailed, Grady makes an example out of the teacher and Disney employees for pub. He calls it a “human trafficking op”.
Politalk laps it up, and thinks that Grady brought down the pedo ring operating in the bowels of Disney’s vast empire.
Thank you to for Grady Judd and “The Sound of Freedom”. They are doing the Lord’s work.
Of course, the vast majority of the folks busted will get off with next to nil time in jail, and shite loads of fines.
It’s about re-election (or advancement) and $$$
Unfortunately, the pedos have somehow escaped this monster pedo catching op.
There will be an identical thread again in a few months (down to the location, and similar suspects). If the pedos are about, I hope Grady gets one next time. Maybe that will be different.
Posted on 9/29/23 at 7:26 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
1. forced labor 2. nowhere near the US
Jackass ... that is not what you wrote. Multiple pages. You did not use "primarily".
Either admit you don't know how to write and made a mistake or admit you are to dumb to understand how to write.
Posted on 9/29/23 at 7:45 pm to dafif
SFP’s argument is clear.
There is no human trafficking in the U.S.
But if there is it is just labor, there is no sex trafficking.
What they call sex trafficking is really just prostitution. And prostitution isn’t wrong.
And there are never any minors involved.
This is his core thesis.
He is wrong. Every source but his “International Labour Organization”, which he references every 3rd reply, says it is.
WHY he wants to convince everyone of this is really the question we need to ask.
And the second question is why so many feel the need to defend him and his abhorrent position.
But human trafficking is one of the two highest revenue industries in the world. Some estimates say it is number one now, even surpassing the drug trade. So there are obviously lots of customers out there.
There is no human trafficking in the U.S.
But if there is it is just labor, there is no sex trafficking.
What they call sex trafficking is really just prostitution. And prostitution isn’t wrong.
And there are never any minors involved.
This is his core thesis.
He is wrong. Every source but his “International Labour Organization”, which he references every 3rd reply, says it is.
WHY he wants to convince everyone of this is really the question we need to ask.
And the second question is why so many feel the need to defend him and his abhorrent position.
But human trafficking is one of the two highest revenue industries in the world. Some estimates say it is number one now, even surpassing the drug trade. So there are obviously lots of customers out there.
Posted on 9/29/23 at 8:05 pm to captdalton
quote:
WHY he wants to convince everyone of this is really the question we need to ask.
For the same reason the other fake lawyer is in every thread about drag queen story hour defending it to the death: because they secretly support these grotesque things but understand how bad it would look to just come right out and say that.
So instead, they obfuscate to attempt to make it seem like it’s not really a problem and shouldn’t be worried about, hoping for incremental acceptance.
Posted on 9/29/23 at 8:10 pm to dafif
quote:
. You did not use "primarily".
Yes I did
quote:
I said human trafficking is primarily:
1. forced labor
2. nowhere near the US
See? Primarily.
This post was edited on 9/29/23 at 8:15 pm
Posted on 9/29/23 at 8:17 pm to Open Your Eyes
quote:
because they secretly support these grotesque things
I openly do the opposite.
quote:
to attempt to make it seem like it’s not really a problem
One specific type that does not exist.
However, there are more problems than just those directly related to human trafficking, namely the state using emotional reactions to the concept and stirring up a false sense of danger to placate the population into accepting incremental acceptance of something else: expanded state power.
Posted on 9/29/23 at 8:23 pm to SlowFlowPro
Again, words and sentence structure are important
Let's do this, let's get an English professor from LSU to determine if primarily means only the word after or also modified after the word "and"
How about $100,000 and a permanent ban for the loser?
Let's do this, let's get an English professor from LSU to determine if primarily means only the word after or also modified after the word "and"
How about $100,000 and a permanent ban for the loser?
Popular
Back to top



1






