- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Federal appeals court maintains temporary block on Trump’s use of Alien Enemies Act
Posted on 3/26/25 at 4:19 pm to wdhalgren
Posted on 3/26/25 at 4:19 pm to wdhalgren
quote:
Some of those countries, like Venezuela, don't want their hardened criminals back, and no other country wants them either, certainly not to loose upon their own population as was done here. The Alien Enemies Act does not specify where they should go other than "out of the territory of the United States"
Well, if the origin countries don't take them back then I say it's fair game to detain them as we please.
0
Posted on 3/26/25 at 4:20 pm to tigerfan 64
Is Guantanamo considered US territory?
Posted on 3/26/25 at 4:48 pm to PUB
quote:
This country is simply beyond repair.
The water has been heating up and is now boiling while all of the frogs sat around on their iPhones and Covid money with record consumer debts.
Everybody should have known a long time ago that any move Trump or his Admin would make would be challenged and stopped by the Federal Judiciary.
No need to get upset at something that all reasonably astute people knew would happen.
Trump is all alone. Congress is not going to help him. The Federal Judiciary is against him. Most of his own Executive Branch wants him out of office.
We all knew it would be like this.
Posted on 3/26/25 at 4:50 pm to swamptiger99
quote:
Ignore this farce of a court
Straight to the SCOTUS, where Roberts, Kavanaugh, Gorsuch and ACB will once again ignore the Constitution and fail America.
Posted on 3/26/25 at 4:51 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
Ignore the ruling…
Posted on 3/26/25 at 4:56 pm to wdhalgren
quote:
“risks exiling plaintiffs to a land that is not their country of origin” where they would face torture in notorious prisons.
This judge is an idiot. They are supposed to rule on the constitutionality of the law. Not their feelings.
Posted on 3/26/25 at 5:10 pm to tigerfan 64
quote:Starting a regular day care center.
Ignore this farce of a courtquote:is it your preference to keep tren de aragua members in the USA?
Y’all are such children.
Posted on 3/26/25 at 5:13 pm to LSUbest
quote:
If Henderson is so concerned maybe he should join them.
Henderson is a she
Posted on 3/26/25 at 5:15 pm to antibarner
quote:Good Lord.quote:This judge is an idiot. They are supposed to rule on the constitutionality of the law. Not their feelings.
“risks exiling plaintiffs to a land that is not their country of origin” where they would face torture in notorious prisons.
At this juncture, they are supposed to rule upon the propriety of injunctive relief ... which includes the element of "irreparable damage."
Ruling upon "constitutionality" is months down the line.
Posted on 3/26/25 at 5:19 pm to TigerNAtux
quote:
They should be unseated.
So... if it's okay to unseat these judges who rule against a President we like, it is also okay to unseat judges who rule against Presidents the twaddle headed liberals like?
Posted on 3/26/25 at 5:23 pm to AggieHank86
Good Lord. Arresting someone for ANYTHING will cause "irreparable damage". So we let them run free and any "Irreparable damage " they cause while running loose is just what?
There's a law on the books. Either what the President is doing is legal, or it is not.
There's a law on the books. Either what the President is doing is legal, or it is not.
Posted on 3/26/25 at 5:24 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
If judges wish to legislate then they need to resign and run for Office.
Posted on 3/26/25 at 5:26 pm to momentoftruth87
quote:
Fed judge defending the constitution. Good job democrats you got us now
fixed it for ya.
Posted on 3/26/25 at 5:35 pm to tigerfan 64
About time we get Judges with a sack instead of a Teddy Bear to hug at night . We have laws in this country we have a constitution we are not Russia , China or a third world .
Posted on 3/26/25 at 5:45 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
At this juncture, they are supposed to rule upon the propriety of injunctive relief ... which includes the element of "irreparable damage."
In a case of wartime, invasion or predatory incursion, as proclaimed by the President, the element of "irreparable damage" to the public safety outweighs the element of "irreparable damage" to alien enemies. Uncounted people (because our news media goes out of their way to avoid reporting their status and many don't get caught) in this country have already suffered irreparable damage at the hands of illegal alien criminals, and many more will in the future.
The Alien Enemies Act gives great latitude to the President, to wit: "The President is authorized in any such event, by his proclamation thereof, or other public act, to direct the conduct to be observed on the part of the United States". That is a direct assignment of powers to the president allowing him/her to act rapidly in such an event to ensure public safety and national security. Injunctive Relief, if allowed in such a matter, gives judges the power to thwart the timely use of that Presidential power and thus risk the public safety and potentially the nation itself. There are limits on the powers of judiciary too, especially the lower courts, and they may well have been exceeded in this case.
This post was edited on 3/26/25 at 10:58 pm
Posted on 3/27/25 at 6:17 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Y’all are such children.
is it your preference to keep tren de aragua members in the USA?
Starting a regular day care center.
You represent the previous regimes "adults in the room".
Your opinion on this matter will be summarily disregarded.
Posted on 3/27/25 at 6:31 pm to GamecockUltimate
quote:
quote:
Fed judge defending the constitution. Good job democrats you got us now
----------------------------------------
fixed it for ya.
Where in the constitution do we find a single district court judge holding this kind of power over executive branch policy?
I still don't understand why any president would give these retards the time of day.
Posted on 3/27/25 at 6:40 pm to David_DJS
quote:
Where in the constitution do we find a single district court judge holding this kind of power over executive branch policy?
Article 3?
Posted on 3/27/25 at 6:42 pm to oklahogjr
quote:
Article 3?
Article 3 provides for Congress to create inferior courts and "defining the jurisdiction of federal courts" - point me to the law where congress gave a single federal district court judge veto power over the chief executive.
Posted on 3/27/25 at 6:43 pm to oklahogjr
quote:
Article 3?
Nope. Not even close
Page 2 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News