- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Exactly how did Zelensky start his war with Russia?
Posted on 2/19/25 at 6:43 pm to TheShmoo
Posted on 2/19/25 at 6:43 pm to TheShmoo
quote:
I missed that little bit of news three years ago. Expecting your usual astute responses.
When Zeelenskee decided to continue his partnership with the Biden Crime Syndicate and the D.C. Bureaucratic State he sealed his and his nation's fate.
Posted on 2/19/25 at 8:30 pm to TBoy
Russians are in Donbas region because Ukraine used to be part of Russia. Soooooo….
Posted on 2/20/25 at 8:36 am to Mickey Goldmill
quote:
In terms of peace talks. What was Russia offering in 2022 that is better than what they are offering today? You may have done better Intel. Otherwise, it just sounds like people are lacking the courage to be honest about Trump completely caving to Putin because that is easier for him.
---
Ding ding ding
I answered this yesterday, but now that you're back online, I'm curious.
Why would there be any presumption Russia would be in a weaker negotiating position now than in Apr22 on the heels of their Kyiv setback. The obvious corollary being, why would Russia settle for anything less today than what they were offering to consider in 2022? They are certainly in no worse a position relative to the opponent.
I know that particular reality won't please the "Slava Ukraini" crowd.
---
But now let's see if the inevitable outcome conveys a lesson. If Ukraine could have a mulligan, a do-over, starting in 2013, how do you think that would go? What if anything would Ukrainians chose to do differently, and how might their lives be better because of it?
This post was edited on 2/20/25 at 8:38 am
Posted on 2/20/25 at 8:37 am to XenScott
quote:
It was started in 2014 by election interference from the Obama administration
Remind me what year Hunters pardon is backdated to?
Posted on 2/20/25 at 8:43 am to TigahTeeth
“Bombing Russians in Donbas”? Not so. Factually inaccurate.
“Laundering money for global elites”is apparently more of that exaggerated fantasy that Trump tried to get Zelensky to confirm during Trump’s first term. He didn’t, so now Trump is getting a little revenge, it seems.
“Laundering money for global elites”is apparently more of that exaggerated fantasy that Trump tried to get Zelensky to confirm during Trump’s first term. He didn’t, so now Trump is getting a little revenge, it seems.
Posted on 2/20/25 at 8:49 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
Why would there be any presumption Russia would be in a weaker negotiating position now than in Apr22 on the heels of their Kyiv setback. The obvious corollary being, why would Russia settle for anything less today than what they were offering to consider in 2022? They are certainly in no worse a position relative to the opponent.
The situation today is not incredibly different than it was in 2022, except both sides have suffered losses. Ukraine more so obviously, but Russia as well.
Ukraine has been firm from the get go that they will not give up any of their land. That position has not changed. Russia's position has not changed either that they won't accept any peace deal without the land.
quote:
But now let's see if the inevitable outcome conveys a lesson. If Ukraine could have a mulligan, a do-over, starting in 2013, how do you think that would go? What if anything would Ukrainians chose to do differently, and how might their lives be better because of it?
Well, I suppose being a Russian puppet state is better than what is going on now. They are essentially in a tug of war between the West and Russia. Choose Russia, nothing really happens. Choose the West, get invaded.
Posted on 2/20/25 at 8:54 am to NC_Tigah
quote:My answer to your question is internal pressure rather than external pressure for Putin to end the war.
Why would there be any presumption Russia would be in a weaker negotiating position now than in Apr22
Putin has always been afraid of a "color" revolution in Russia. (Many people only think of the October, 1917 Russian revolution but the fact is Russia has had more than dozen revolutions in the last 250 years. Russia is revolution prone.)
If enough Russians get weary of having their young men killed and maimed (even Trump yesterday said Russia has "lost" 900,000 men in Ukraine) and Putin's Stassi can't control the dissent any longer, then Putin might be willing to end the war on less favorable terms today than he could have done in 2022.
Because Putin's regime controls the press and all public communications so fiercely there is no way to know how much internal dissent to the war is present.
Posted on 2/20/25 at 8:56 am to VOR
quote:You're mistaken. Not only is it factually accurate, but IAW Angela Merkel's admissions, the bombing was conducted with western knowledge under the false pretext of the Minsk Agreements.
“Bombing Russians in Donbas”? Not so. Factually inaccurate.
Posted on 2/20/25 at 9:13 am to LSURussian
quote:Absolutely.
If enough Russians get weary of having their young men killed and maimed (even Trump yesterday said Russia has "lost" 900,000 men in Ukraine) and Putin's Stassi can't control the dissent any longer, then Putin might be willing to end the war on less favorable terms today than he could have done in 2022.
Total truth. Perhaps that was the the Potatobrain/Johnson hope when they scuttled negotiations in Apr 2022.
The question is, are enough Russians that weary?
As far as I can tell, they are pretty pissed off at the West for continually poking them in the eye. They see Putin as their best, strongest counter. My understanding is his popularity is actually up (Newsweek, Statistica, Levada Center, and VTsIOM).
I don't think the same is true for Zelensky.
Posted on 2/20/25 at 9:14 am to TheShmoo
quote:
TheShmoo
Why are you so upset the war may be ending soon?
Posted on 2/20/25 at 9:24 am to NC_Tigah
quote:Yeah, I wouldn't put much faith in any polling numbers in Russia.
They see Putin as their best, strongest counter. My understanding is his popularity is actually up
First of all, Putin controls those polls to the point that Russians being polled are wary they are being tested by the government for loyalty. They're afraid to say negative things to a pollster in order to avoid the midnight knock on their door.
Second, Russians have very little access to any negative news about the war. Picture 150 million people who only know what John Barron says about their war. Times 100. All they hear is how the brave Russian soldiers are slaying the Nazis in Ukraine.
Third, Putin has done a masterful job of limiting the draft of Moscow and St. Petersburg draftees. That's where revolutions in Russian begin. He has been drafting in the Far East and Siberia and in the Caucasus region. Those Muslim and Asiatic savages in those regions don't matter in public opinion polls.
Posted on 2/20/25 at 9:27 am to LSURussian
quote:
Picture 150 million people who only know what John Barron says about their war.

Posted on 2/20/25 at 9:51 am to Mickey Goldmill
quote:There it is.
Well, I suppose being a Russian puppet state is better than what is going on now. They are essentially in a tug of war between the West and Russia. Choose Russia, nothing really happens. Choose the West, get invaded.
I've always maintained that was the reality Viktor Yanukovych recognized. Moving too far, too fast from the Russian orbit always came with risk. When he put the brakes on, Toria Nuland, Soros, etc went nuts. They slapped him with the West's best slimey propaganda, successfully tarred him as "Putin's Puppet," and got him overthrown in a coup.
I'd bet there's many a Ukrainian who wish they could have that moment back.
Posted on 2/20/25 at 9:56 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
When he put the brakes on, Toria Nuland, Soros, etc went nuts.
The citizens and government of Ukraine went nuts on their own.
Yesterday I posted literal polling data and voting records of that time to show that EU integration was EXTREMELY popular, even in the eastern portions of Ukraine. Their Parliament had confirmed support of integration at over 90% support earlier that year.
Discounting the response of the citizens/government has always been the major rhetorical talking point around "the coup".
quote:
and got him overthrown in a coup
Again, integration had over 90% support in their Parliament. Why would we expect them to not react to his unilateral decision in the manner they did without any other influence?
The logical position based on the objective data at the time is exactly what they did.
Posted on 2/20/25 at 10:12 am to LSURussian
quote:Spot on. I agree.
Yeah, I wouldn't put much faith in any polling numbers in Russia.
First of all, Putin controls those polls to the point that Russians being polled are wary they are being tested by the government for loyalty. They're afraid to say negative things to a pollster in order to avoid the midnight knock on their door.
Second, Russians have very little access to any negative news about the war. Picture 150 million people who only know what John Barron says about their war. Times 100. All they hear is how the brave Russian soldiers are slaying the Nazis in Ukraine.
Third, Putin has done a masterful job of limiting the draft of Moscow and St. Petersburg draftees. That's where revolutions in Russian begin. He has been drafting in the Far East and Siberia and in the Caucasus region. Those Muslim and Asiatic savages in those regions don't matter in public opinion polls.
It is given the reality of #2 and #3, combined with polling direction (2021 vs 2024) across the board, that leaves me suspicious Putin's situation is substantially better than Zelensky's. Obviously there are HUGE challenges polling Russians, especially about Putin. Plus, polls like VTsIOM are state-run, and dubious. But the trends are similar regardless of source. Meanwhile, 60% of Ukrainians do not want to see Zelensky run again, and only ~16% say they'd vote for him. IMO that's why Putin is pushing for Ukrainian elections ASAP.
Posted on 2/20/25 at 10:33 am to stout
quote:
Did you miss the part where Ukraine has been begging to join the NATO and Putin saying he didn't want NATO on his doorstep?
Well that worked out well for him. Putin started a war and drove two countries in Sweden and Finland, that have denied Nato for 70 years right into its arms. His actions based on lies got him the exact thing he claimed he couldn't let happen, hundreds more miles of border with a Nato country (Finland).
Posted on 2/20/25 at 10:47 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:They only knew what they were being told. Who controlled that information? Given what we know of US subterfuge and influence peddling in Ukraine, if you believe Ukrainians controlled that dialogue, or that it was independently derived, you're very naive.
EU integration was EXTREMELY popular
Any cautionary message Yanukovych tried to issue was drowned out by bribed officials and a western puppet press.
They said, "Come take a bite of the apple, Eve. The fruit is sweet. Riches will flow like mana from Heaven. Nothing will go wrong. The EU is Nirvana! If Yanukovych stands in the way, we'll overthrow him in a coup, just like any good democracy would." As you say, "they went nuts."
Just, btw, as we did under a relatively more shallow flood of similarly organized propaganda.
Perhaps, just perhaps, if Ukrainians had known the true lay-of-the-land though, if they'd had access to any facts rather than a tsunami of propaganda, perhaps if they'd been honestly apprised of inherent risks, they would have responded quite differently to western influenced polls, and disinformation. I'd say it would be a very good bet.
As I've told you, Ukrainians were led by the nose to this end. They will come to recognize that, if they haven't already, as will you.
Posted on 2/20/25 at 10:54 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
if they'd had access to any facts rather than a tsunami of propaganda, perhaps if they'd been honestly apprised of inherent risks,
The "risks" were relatively incomprehensible in terms of the post-Cold War world. Nobody thought an outlier scenario like invasion was likely...not for joining the EU (even within the context of Russian satellite nations, as many had already joined the EU).
quote:
Given what we know of US subterfuge and influence peddling in Ukraine, if you believe Ukrainians controlled that dialogue, or that it was independently derived, you're very naive.
They don't need "US subterfuge" to see how great joining the EU was for:
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Estonia
Hungary
Latvia
Lithuania
Malta
Poland
Slovakia
Slovenia
Bulgaria
Romania
Croatia
All states in the former USSR sphere of influence (except maybe Malta)
Posted on 2/20/25 at 10:55 am to TheShmoo
quote:
Expecting your usual astute responses.
Zelensky didnt.
Our own Bureaucrats are more responsible.
Posted on 2/20/25 at 10:58 am to stout
quote:
Did you miss the part where Ukraine has been begging to join the NATO and Putin saying he didn't want NATO on his doorstep? Guess you think the USA would be OK with Mexico teaming up with a Russian led coalition
Some of you will never stop parroting this asinine line I guess. Hopeless.
Look at a map, google countries that have joined NATO, and come back.
It had zero to do with NATO and everything to do with his longing for the Soviet Union of yesteryear. This is common sense.
Popular
Back to top


0







