
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Every Election Is Portrayed As An Existential Threat If Your Side Loses
Posted on 11/5/26 at 8:19 am to StansberryRules
Posted on 11/5/26 at 8:19 am to StansberryRules
quote:
None of the millions of Indians or Muslims flooding into this country are ever voting Republican.
This is easily disproven.
Trump got 31% of the Muslim vote in 2024 and Kamala got less than Biden with 15% going third party.
Jill Stein got 12% in 2024.
Posted on 11/5/26 at 8:27 am to CU_Tigers4life
quote:
Now the GOP have a many years to recreate themselves into something more modern...
Yall just don’t get it.
These are not the same democrats from 10 -20 years ago.
And…
We just gave them an almost veto proof majority. They will almost certainly get in 2028.
Now that we lost this block of senators and the Senate, we are screwed for at least 6 years.
The Dems will defund DHS and open the floodgates and we may never win again. Amnesty for all illegals
Posted on 11/5/26 at 8:27 am to sgallo3
quote:
You realize people say this every election also right?
I'm not "people", I'm one person who just gave you his opinion on why this is different, rather than just saying its different.
quote:
Its why we never escape the 2 party system. Every election is "too important to lose" so people bite the bullet, hold their nose, and pick blue or red. Every single time.
I don't understand how this statement logically follows the previous one. People don't pick a side out of fear, they pick the side that at least claims to hold to their values. What difference does it make how many parties there are? At no time in the history of the world have all people agreed on everything. So should we just have one party with a bunch of people in it who don't agree with each other? Should we have three? What does it matter?
It seems like people just says things like this about "we can't escape the two party system", but never actually think about what that actually means, and never bother to articulate it.
Posted on 11/5/26 at 8:33 am to loogaroo
We are far away from 290 House votes and 67 Senate Votes to be "veto Proof"
In 10 years those naive young voters will be in their 30's paying taxes and operating in the world they created...Just like the Obama kids.
There are always events in the world that affects policy and voting.
With the 2028 election cycle you will see Dems eating each other for traction.
Let it play out for a while. Put the electric razor away and don't cut your wrist.
In 10 years those naive young voters will be in their 30's paying taxes and operating in the world they created...Just like the Obama kids.
There are always events in the world that affects policy and voting.
With the 2028 election cycle you will see Dems eating each other for traction.
Let it play out for a while. Put the electric razor away and don't cut your wrist.
Posted on 11/5/26 at 8:35 am to CU_Tigers4life
quote:
Yeah..that was odd. I live in Ga (sadly) and I've seen this coming.
Georgia may be past the tipping point with Atlanta.
Posted on 11/5/26 at 8:36 am to Metaloctopus
quote:
Should we have three? What does it matter?
The reason 2 is a problem (as 1 would also be) is candidates have to sell out to a party to have a shot at being nominated. Even trump had to swap from Democrat to Republican because there was no chance of being elected without party support.
Requiring party support creates a gatekeeping effect with bribery (initiation rituals also) because if you want the party to back your campaign, you have to do what they say. We are no longer electing candidates based on their individual ideals/values.
This post was edited on 11/5/26 at 8:40 am
Posted on 11/5/26 at 8:38 am to CU_Tigers4life
I never worried about midterms and I have been voting a very long time. It always ebbs and flows.
But, several of the Dems aren't your run of the mill Dems of the past. They are radicals with beliefs that aren't true to our nation.
If the majority of the Dems that don't hold the same beliefs aren't able to curtail them, our nation will suffer immensely.
But, several of the Dems aren't your run of the mill Dems of the past. They are radicals with beliefs that aren't true to our nation.
If the majority of the Dems that don't hold the same beliefs aren't able to curtail them, our nation will suffer immensely.
Posted on 11/5/26 at 8:40 am to ColoradoAg
quote:
I am taking steps to protect my assets from the socialists
Yup. Will come in the form of "Capital Control".
Posted on 11/5/26 at 8:41 am to deathvalleytiger10
The Democrats are now Liberals/Socialists. So buckle up if you are younger.
Posted on 11/5/26 at 8:43 am to sgallo3
quote:
The reason 2 is a problem (as 1 would also be) is candidates have to sell out to a party to have a shot at being nominated. Even trump had to swap from Democrat to Republican because there was no chance of being elected without party support.
Requiring party support creates a gatekeeping effect with bribery because if you want the party to back your campaign, you have to do what they say. We are no longer electing candidates based on their individual ideals/values.
So you're suggesting we don't have any parties, and people just run as people? How exactly will this change the ideology of people running for office, and the people who support the policies and beliefs of those running? Will they simply cease to spend money or speak publicly in support of their preferred candidates?
And Trump didn't switch to Republican for party support. He switched because his beliefs no longer aligned with that party. And he was not given great support by the GOP. They frankly never took him very seriously. But he's a billionaire, so he really didn't need their money, and we, the people, voted him in because he had a clear, no BS message that we all believed in.
This post was edited on 11/5/26 at 8:44 am
Posted on 11/5/26 at 8:47 am to CU_Tigers4life
The issue that will continue to plague conservatives:
GOP candidates need to be truly perfect or large percentages will refuse to vote for that candidate due to some affront 15 years ago.
A liberal candidate only needs ‘D’ behind their name.
Until this changes, conservative candidates will always struggle.
Additionally. The scrutiny applied to R’s running for elected offices is nowhere near the scrutiny applied to D’s.
GOP candidates need to be truly perfect or large percentages will refuse to vote for that candidate due to some affront 15 years ago.
A liberal candidate only needs ‘D’ behind their name.
Until this changes, conservative candidates will always struggle.
Additionally. The scrutiny applied to R’s running for elected offices is nowhere near the scrutiny applied to D’s.
Posted on 11/5/26 at 8:50 am to CU_Tigers4life
quote:
I've been able to vote since 1982 and I've hear this every election as if humanity will end if your side loses. People are wringing heir hands and clutching their people as if America has fallen...
Here's a clue...All that has happened is the GOP lost a mid term election as history shows would happen.
The voters got tired of the GOP sitting on their asses and Trumps bi-polar bullshite and they got their asses spanked for failing to listen to the people.
Trump was more interest in talking about bombing Iran, reflection pools, ballrooms, arches, how "hot" our economy was without addressing simple issues that the average person deals with daily.
People's perception may have not been in sync with reality and the GOP did a shitty job of addressing this issue.
Now the voters put the GOP in time out and got rig of a lot of dead weight. I don't like it but sometimes a reset is needed.
The Democrats will show to America that they were bullshitting about the things they campaigned on to get elected. When the voters catch up to their lies they too will get punished in the next few elections.
Just live your lives and let it play out.
We just spent 12 years watching kids be mutilated, unfettered immigration, Debt go up, inflation go up and on and on, gender confusion running rampant. We just pulled out of most of that stuff - and we're going right back in.
The US was pretty messy from 2008-2024. Even with Trump's first presidency.
Posted on 11/5/26 at 9:03 am to Metaloctopus
quote:And lo, even this was a mirage - none of the disclosures promised (Epstein, JFK, UFOs) had substance - No new wars morphed into Iran - inflation, gas and grocery prices skyrocketed - tariffs - Swamp just swampier, not drained - all these promises/all BS.
we, the people, voted him (DJT) in because he had a clear, no BS message that we all believed in.
This post was edited on 11/5/26 at 9:06 am
Posted on 11/5/26 at 9:05 am to Metaloctopus
quote:
I don't think every loss in elections is the end of our country, or potentially so. This one is very different because, if you haven't noticed, the democratic party has become so radicalized, they openly celebrate the death of an opponent. And they aren't just liberals anymore, they are communists. They have become so corrupt that they will try to make every law they can to make sure they never lose power.
That's what I was going to reply.
If the Democracrats from 1962 had won it would be different... But not these blue haired, ring nosed kids who are rioting in the streets wanting to defund the police.
They openly say White peole are the problem, even if some of them are white. They also openly state that Republicans need to either be killed or put into camps.
And people voted for them because of Free stuff and we hate Trump because my mama said so.
This group voted in is not normal. We used to be a Christian nation and founded our principle upon it. Now they hate Christians because the bible says they can't be gay...
Posted on 11/5/26 at 9:17 am to CU_Tigers4life
Yep when the left fails to actually do anything there low propensity voters aren’t going to show up and the rights will. The big part will be the left does a better job of getting their low likely voters out since they commit so much fraud
Posted on 11/5/26 at 9:55 am to Metaloctopus
I agree with this. I'm ashamed to admit that I was a Democrat until 2020 when I started really paying attention and saw that they have gone absolutely nuts. This is not -- ha ha -- laugh it off politics as usual. They truly hate America and are out to destroy it and start over.

Popular
Back to top


0











