- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics

Freauxzen
| Favorite team: | Washington State |
| Location: | Washington |
| Biography: | LSU Alumni (2004) UWM (2007), Born and raised in LA. Moved from a cushy public sector job in Education to a crazy, cutting-edge, job in a tech/education. Currently a Software Executive. |
| Interests: | Reading, Writing, Arithmetic, Sports (soccer player by nature), Movies, Arguing about random things, Useless Information |
| Occupation: | Software, Sales |
| Number of Posts: | 38442 |
| Registered on: | 2/14/2006 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: Happy Anniversary to those of us who survived the Winter of Severe Illness and Death
Posted by Freauxzen on 12/24/25 at 11:14 am to SquatchDawg
quote:
but don’t pretend it was all bullshite.
Wrong. Know that it WAS all bullshite.
That's the issue. That's why we'll never know how "Real," the whole situation was. Looking back, it looks like a lot of bullshite. That doesn't mean that COVID wasn't real. Whatever kind of virus that was - yes it was real. But was it THAT serious for everyone? What did or did not happen with the ventilators/remisvidir? Who actually died from COVID? What was the actual impact? Why did Flu numbers shift so dramatically? What was in the vaccine?
There are so many questions without answers, answers that we will never REALLY know, we can't actually define ANYTHING in that time. You have to question most of the deaths "from Covid." You have to question most of the concerns around the vaccine. So talking about a bunch of people "who died from Covid," is false. They died from a poorly mis handled and mis communicated situation. Undetermined. Covid? Maybe. Maybe not. But we can't actually even define any of that.
That's not your fault, or my fault. That's the fault of the people in charge.
There are only a few directors in Kubrick's tier and Nolan isn't near any of them.
Kubrick, Kurosawa, Hitchcock, Ford. Maybe Lean, Wilder.
Thats about it.
Kubrick, Kurosawa, Hitchcock, Ford. Maybe Lean, Wilder.
Thats about it.
re: This year's top portal QB's set to ask for $4-5 million
Posted by Freauxzen on 12/23/25 at 2:11 pm to ReauxlTide222
quote:
Is that the one where the video game used the athletes to make billions and didn’t give them much of anything in return?
You mean LSU QB #6 on EA NCAA roster who looked like a cross between Shrek and Cro Magnon man, and then Clemson OT #71 who also looked like a cross between Shrek and Cro-Magnon man. And also KSU RB #11 who also looked like that, but was black?
You mean those characters?
The thing was - that game was more about just being to be the coach of LSU and winning the SEC. It had little to do with the players, it was about the team.
quote:
Does this cheapen Steve's happy ending in Endgame?
I mean, comics
re: Searching for possibly obscure Movie Recommendations
Posted by Freauxzen on 12/21/25 at 11:16 pm to Chesticles
Ravenous
In China They Eat Dogs
The Spanish Prisoner
The Diving Bell and the Butterfly
A History of Violence
Coherence
Bone Tomahawk
The Autopsy of Jane Doe
In China They Eat Dogs
The Spanish Prisoner
The Diving Bell and the Butterfly
A History of Violence
Coherence
Bone Tomahawk
The Autopsy of Jane Doe
I know it's the goal, but they really need to stop the whole normalization project. This is what further divides.
quote:
If someone doesn’t want to have kids why is that a problem
If it were like a smattering of people here and there sure, but this article the doinks or dinks whatever they call themselves, etc. it's become a whole culture of not having kids. That's different.
quote:
society has enough unwanted kids.
Not sure not having kids is the best solution to this problem.
re: Christian Existentialism?
Posted by Freauxzen on 12/18/25 at 12:34 am to bayoubengals88
quote:
Or, I could just read the Summa with Grok’s help, asking it was Kreeft says about any given topic!
As someone who works in AI, don't do that.
:lol:
It's Rocky and not close. Sorry.
The revolt against having kids over the last few decades is just f-ing mind blowing.
Such a jaded view of the world and why we are here. Why we are different. Why we get up and go to work and deal with all the other stuff. Why we build lives and connections with people.
To just throw it all away... what is the point?
Such a jaded view of the world and why we are here. Why we are different. Why we get up and go to work and deal with all the other stuff. Why we build lives and connections with people.
To just throw it all away... what is the point?
quote:
I've got a couple of Acquinas books in my lineup because he seems so fascinating. Which ones do you recommend. I have Guide to Thomas Acquinas by Joseph Pieper and Acquinas's Shorter Summa on my list
Both of those are solid, but you really have to just start reading the Summa. Kreeft's Summa of the Summa is probably your best overall guide. I do like Pieper's work though too.
In terms of the OP, that no one questions their beliefs, it's the perfect antidote if you want someone who voraciously questioned everything. Did his best to respond ad critique and laid it all out on paper. I would say start on page 1, i did, but that's tough. It might better to move to whatever section of the Summa is more relevant to your interests, and any of the short guides can do a pretty good guide of summarizing sections or arguments that you may pass over by not going cover to cover.
re: What Philosopher Today Will Be Studied in 100 Years?
Posted by Freauxzen on 12/17/25 at 4:28 pm to RanchoLaPuerto
Carl Trueman
re: Christian Existentialism?
Posted by Freauxzen on 12/16/25 at 10:32 am to bayoubengals88
quote:
I've been a Christian all my life, and I'm kind of starting to think that nearly everyone in the church is just full of shite. By this I mean that they probably don't question what they profess to believe, and if they did seriously evaluate it all, they would probably be afraid to admit the results.
Go start reading Aquinas.
And don't be afraid of using a guide. You are welcome.
re: Help me understand why I should care Reiner died or what Trump said about it
Posted by Freauxzen on 12/16/25 at 10:29 am to Tigahs24Seven
quote:
However, you should be really concerned that the leader of the free world, that we all put in that position with our votes if confidence, has absolutely no self control or filter.
Ok I am concerned, now what?
quote:
that is a very scary prospect with the power he wields
Look, what Trump said was awful, however, he's proven to be more savvy in international circumstances. Even "rocket man," didn't move the needle. Openly mocking both Macron and Starmer, etc. It never REALLY matters.
Could he make a bigger mistake? Sure. And he probably will, will it be earth shattering? Probably not.
quote:
You should also be concerned that the nuts on here think Trump was justified cause Reiner hurt Trump's feelings and called him names. Seriously?
They have poor morals too, but at the end of the day, why do I have to concern with all of this stuff? For the added stress?
It changes nothing.
The OP is correct.
While I don't like what he said, it's not like I'm going to turn around and vote for the pro-choice movement. So what does it actually matter?
And Reiner saying nice things about Kirk, so what? Who cares? He most likely didn't mean it, because by all accounts Kirk was a Nazi, and a f#$%^& MAGA, so it was insincere. Reiner clearly thought anyone on the right was a Nazi. That doesn't justify ANYTHING, not even Trump's words, however it also doesn't give Reiner some sort of pass either. That's why none of the empty displays of some integrity just don't matter from most of the other side. What happened was sad, as is any murder situation. Happens every day, we should say a quick prayer and move on. None of this was a big deal.
re: Your mercy and outrage will be exploited against you
Posted by Freauxzen on 12/15/25 at 5:08 pm to Bobby OG Johnson
I have but one upvote to give.
Solid post and the right perspective. The Left does not care about you or your opinions or your kindness. None of that matters.
Solid post and the right perspective. The Left does not care about you or your opinions or your kindness. None of that matters.
quote:
If you can't see how his comments were worthy of criticism
Of course they are. It was classless, mean-spirited and unnecessary. Trump can be pretty mean, and this is probably his worst ever jab. 100%. Dude is not Christian, and has a questionable moral compass, all true.
However, that changes nothing for you or me. It doesn't matter what Republicans do or don't do, they will always be painted as Nazis with "binders full of women," and Hitler, and murderers because they support not transitioning minors. They took a Mormon with a pretty good record, and painted him evil with said binders. They take Pro-Life protestors and paint them as evil. All of a Christian Conservatives good intentions - EVEN THOUGHTS AND PRAYERS, are just sullied constantly. None of this decorum really matters. It changes nothing.
Now, we should still do it, we should still be nice, we should still pray for them very much so.
Trump should be better, people in general should be better. But if they aren't....? Like am I going to turn around and vote for the Pro-Choice party because Trump did something stupid? Like, what does the outrage and the feigned decorum accomplish?
And like I said, does Obama get points for reacting with "sadness" to Kirk's death when he is one of the biggest dividers politics has ever seen? You know he doesn't actually care about Kirk, and that it was a calculated response purely for looks. You KNOW this. Obama's and to that point, Reiner's reaction to Kirk's death is irrelevant. Honestly. Like what does it change? It didn't change them, it didn't change what they say. So why does it matter at all?
A bunch of people are acting like Trump's response MATTERS, like truly matters. But it really doesn't. Again, I get it, I get why you think that. But what is the outcome of it really mattering? He should be called out on it, but beyond that, what does it change? He won't change, they won't change, I won't change - for lots of different reasons. Therefore, it's generally irrelevant.
re: We should treat the death of Charlie Kirk & Rob Reiner the same
Posted by Freauxzen on 12/15/25 at 3:32 pm to hawgfaninc
Do people not understand the difference here?
What Trump and Reiner did around Kirk's death or this one are completely irrelevant.
People react to the Kirk reactions, not because one person said one thing, it's because it was pretty clear that a large portion of the Left, by virtue of their language for the past three decades, do not want specifically Christian Conservatives being a part of any political process, they want them silenced in any way possible. Even in death. And that their removal from the process, by whatever means, is necessary and beneficial to progress.
You can try to paint a bunch of stuff around this, but that's what it was. The Left do not actually want the opinion of a Chrisitian Conservative counted in anything. That's why people reacted the way they did. It had nothing to do with reactions to Kirk specifically, but what that means at scale.
What Trump and Reiner did around Kirk's death or this one are completely irrelevant.
People react to the Kirk reactions, not because one person said one thing, it's because it was pretty clear that a large portion of the Left, by virtue of their language for the past three decades, do not want specifically Christian Conservatives being a part of any political process, they want them silenced in any way possible. Even in death. And that their removal from the process, by whatever means, is necessary and beneficial to progress.
You can try to paint a bunch of stuff around this, but that's what it was. The Left do not actually want the opinion of a Chrisitian Conservative counted in anything. That's why people reacted the way they did. It had nothing to do with reactions to Kirk specifically, but what that means at scale.
re: You're an NFL HC, your team is 16-0 going into the final week
Posted by Freauxzen on 12/15/25 at 3:03 pm to SoFla Tideroller
Someone's never seen Tin Cup.
Of course you go for greatness, ever time. That's the only way to achieve it.
Of course you go for greatness, ever time. That's the only way to achieve it.
re: Pearl Clutchers RE: Trump mean tweets
Posted by Freauxzen on 12/15/25 at 2:56 pm to burger bearcat
quote:
People simply can’t separate politics from their personal feelings
I'd say, people selectively decide to not separate their politics from their personal feelings when they feel like they want to take a stance or make a point, otherwise, they don't care.
quote:
Just because Trump as a person, is basically a POS, narcissistic a-hole… does not mean the conservative movement can’t use him and his agenda to steer him towards our own agenda (at times there will be some conflict in this)
Politics is a team sport, and all about forming coalitions around flawed individuals. You take who you can get across the finish line with, and you squeeze as much out of them as possible to further your piece of the coalitions agenda as possible
Totally jaded. But also totally true.
I think people want politics to be tied to some higher moral standard or process, but it just isn't. Ever.
quote:
This is why I never buy into the cult love of Trump as an individual, but do appreciate the greater movement that is tied to him, and recognize that for now he still needs to be the front man for that movement even with his warts and all
Unfortunately also true.
quote:
I’m still always amazed when people get so outraged and “shocked” when he says something off the wall or low class. Have you been living underground for the last 10 years?! Just accept that it is part of the deal, and move on. Maybe the next guy can be a little more tactful, but hopefully not a complete pussy like Romney or someone.
Or that I guess people think that Reiner or Obama were somehow really sorry by what happened to Charlie Kirk? I'm not saying most on the Left are or aren't - I just don't assume it without proof. But if your actions don't necessarily change, specifically in how you view the other side in these cases, I just can't thing it was honest. At all.
And, does someone on the Left, who supports abortion and illegal immigration and lopping genitals off minors, really get a pass because they said something nice about Charlie Kirk? I'm not saying they do or don't, just it's relatively irrelevant. Both Reiner saying nice things about Charlie and Trump saying bad things about Reiner. Reiner never really changed his perspective on the Right and MAGA< so who cares what he said? Trump - I mean, it was an awful thing to say, but it doesn't necessarily making him worse then - he's already proven to be thin skinned and narcissistic. Like, so what? If anyone was looking for Trump to be a moral guide - probably the wrong choice, we all knew that.
Why does any of this matter?
quote:
And it's not crazy to think we should hold the president to a much higher standard
What does this even mean?
Is high standards for a President getting a blow job in the oval office? Lying about stuff to get a war supported? Being racially divisive? Mean Tweets?
I'm going to say, we should probably have a good idea of that, but it's not like it has ever mattered.
Popular
1












