Started By
Message

re: Elon Musk says it is time to leave NATO and the UN

Posted on 3/2/25 at 11:05 am to
Posted by John Barron
The Mar-a-Lago Club
Member since Sep 2024
15482 posts
Posted on 3/2/25 at 11:05 am to
quote:

who regularly breaks pacts and treaties





Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.
Posted by Harry Boutte
Louisiana
Member since Oct 2024
2204 posts
Posted on 3/2/25 at 11:06 am to
quote:

Both NATO and the UN take a lot of US resources yet give us back nothing but grief, disrespect, and headache.


Where did this lie originate? We wouldn't save any money getting out of either organization. That shouldn't be the motivating force.

Do we believe in helping to maintain the security in Europe that we gave so many lives to create - or not? Because our defense bill won't go down if we were to leave NATO.

What expenses are required by the UN? Why would we leave an organization that has put us at the head of the table with full veto power, and no real responsibilities? Where's the loss there? What do we gain by leaving? It isn't about money, so what is it about?
Posted by Paytonisablowhard
Member since Feb 2024
1183 posts
Posted on 3/2/25 at 11:16 am to
quote:


Europe seems hellbent on, the United States, funding
This post was edited on 3/2/25 at 11:17 am
Posted by Diamondawg
Mississippi
Member since Oct 2006
35082 posts
Posted on 3/2/25 at 11:17 am to
quote:

All NATO members are required to commit 3% of GDP toward national defense.
Reduce our contribution to the median of all countries. Those countries would have to put up more, raising the median which our contribution would rise comensurate. Start negotions with Poland and Hungary to move bases there.
Posted by Matt225
St. George
Member since Dec 2019
1071 posts
Posted on 3/2/25 at 11:18 am to
NATO we should withdrawal from or at very least cut USA funding to 1/2 of the combined funding of all other nations.

Currently US- $755 Billion / all other NATO nations combined $430 Billion.
So cut ours to only $215 Billion. BooM $645Billion of American First saved.

The UN - GTFO I mean yesterday and kick out of USA. A completely useless Globalists BS.
Posted by Reeaholic
Moss Bluff
Member since Jun 2019
1191 posts
Posted on 3/2/25 at 11:20 am to
It isn’t so much about money as it is the EU has used us as a de facto military defense which is unfair to us.

My opinion is that a new NATO be established but include India, Russia, South Korea, Egypt, Japan and whatever EU countries want to join. Make clear established rules that work in the new geopolitical climate, Russia can’t attack neighbors without authorization or be kicked out and have the alliance back the attacked country is just one example with military or trade embargoes. Put trade agreements in the alliance to make it more favorable for each country involved instead of just a military alliance. It may be a non starter to do but I’d imagine some of those countries would love to join that new alliance. This is just off the top of my head so of course it will have some not thought out flaws.
Posted by BHTiger
Charleston
Member since Dec 2017
7173 posts
Posted on 3/2/25 at 11:20 am to
Europe looks down us and our way of life (not as many social programs). We'll if we didn't prop everyone up we would be in much better shape.

Eff Europe, find actual friends.
Posted by ibldprplgld
Member since Feb 2008
26157 posts
Posted on 3/2/25 at 11:21 am to
quote:

Where did this lie originate? We wouldn't save any money getting out of either organization. That shouldn't be the motivating force. Do we believe in helping to maintain the security in Europe that we gave so many lives to create - or not? Because our defense bill won't go down if we were to leave NATO. What expenses are required by the UN? Why would we leave an organization that has put us at the head of the table with full veto power, and no real responsibilities? Where's the loss there? What do we gain by leaving? It isn't about money, so what is it about?


The US has the same rights and privileges as the other permanent members of the Security Council, yet shocker, we contribute billions annually to the UN, significantly more than any other member nation.

The rest of what you posted doesn’t warrant a response as it’s all been addressed already in the thread.
Posted by Big4SALTbro
Member since Jun 2019
21090 posts
Posted on 3/2/25 at 11:21 am to
Yes, I’ve had this position for 10 or so years at least.
Posted by Diamondawg
Mississippi
Member since Oct 2006
35082 posts
Posted on 3/2/25 at 11:29 am to
quote:

Do we believe in helping to maintain the security in Europe that we gave so many lives to create - or not? Because our defense bill won't go down if we were to leave NATO.
How long do you stay in an agreement where the parties don't hold up their end of the bargain and you spend a disproportinate part of the ongoing expenses? Indefinately or do you renegotiate or threaten to cancel the contract?

quote:

What expenses are required by the UN? Why would we leave an organization that has put us at the head of the table with full veto power, and no real responsibilities? Where's the loss there? What do we gain by leaving? It isn't about money, so what is it about?
Other than having veto power, what exactly does the UN espouse that most of time has the interests of the US at the top of the list?
Posted by Harry Boutte
Louisiana
Member since Oct 2024
2204 posts
Posted on 3/2/25 at 11:31 am to
quote:

the EU has used us as a de facto military defense which is unfair to us.

How so?
Posted by Paytonisablowhard
Member since Feb 2024
1183 posts
Posted on 3/2/25 at 11:31 am to
quote:

All NATO members are required to commit 3% of GDP toward national defense.


California's GDP is the fifth largest in the world behind the US, China, Japan and Germany.

Looking at it that way it's not fair nor logical for the United States to be required to give as much
Posted by cadillacattack
the ATL
Member since May 2020
7945 posts
Posted on 3/2/25 at 11:31 am to
Musk is right, IMO.

A global recession is underway and trump knows what's coming. The US Debt level has grown to Godzilla-level, ... completely unsustainable .... especially in a recession

The bloat must be eliminated immediately .... time is of the essence.

America simply cannot afford to support other countries in the same manner that we have enjoyed in the past

Those leaders that are tightening their belts are doing the right thing for their respective citizenry. Trump is putting America on a much-needed budgetary diet before the economic reckoning arrives.

NATO must go .... it is time.
This post was edited on 3/2/25 at 11:37 am
Posted by Harry Boutte
Louisiana
Member since Oct 2024
2204 posts
Posted on 3/2/25 at 11:42 am to
quote:

All NATO members are required to commit 3% of GDP toward national defense.

That's a lie.

The problem is that so many people have such strong opinions on NATO, and yet are completely ignorant of it.
Posted by Harry Boutte
Louisiana
Member since Oct 2024
2204 posts
Posted on 3/2/25 at 11:44 am to
quote:

we contribute billions annually to the UN, significantly more than any other member nation.

How much?

quote:

The rest of what you posted doesn’t warrant a response as it’s all been addressed already in the thread.

Not really, it's mostly misinformation about how funding works in NATO. HINT: Everyone is all paid up on their dues, and pretty much always have been, the US doesn't ever pay anyone else's part.
Posted by deltaland
Member since Mar 2011
97189 posts
Posted on 3/2/25 at 11:49 am to
I want to bring back pre WW1 America

Mind our own business
Have a small standing army
Abolish income tax
Abolish the Fed
Revenue comes from Tariffs
Abolish labor unions
Deregulate industries
Posted by Reeaholic
Moss Bluff
Member since Jun 2019
1191 posts
Posted on 3/2/25 at 11:50 am to
How so? What are the EU’s military capabilities? You think that’s protecting them or is it in fact the US threat of military? Germany for example refuses to strengthen their weak military being as we are their defense. We are their defense. 70% of NATO’s military spending is from the US. The other 31 countries account for 30% or 1% each in comparison. I get our economy is vastly superior but 70 to 1 is not a fair deal.

Edit, I know we will always spend more on our military but it’s time for them to step up and be able to defend themselves also
This post was edited on 3/2/25 at 11:52 am
Posted by deltaland
Member since Mar 2011
97189 posts
Posted on 3/2/25 at 11:51 am to
quote:

However, it was our failure to participate in the League of Nations (the forerunner to the UN) in the aftermath of the First World War that ultimately led to the rise of Imperial Japan and Nazi Germany.


It was way more complicated than that


I’d argue that if we stayed out of WW1, neither of those things happen and there is no WW2
Posted by Harry Boutte
Louisiana
Member since Oct 2024
2204 posts
Posted on 3/2/25 at 11:51 am to
quote:

you spend a disproportinate part of the ongoing expenses?

Can you be more specific?

We're not paying more for our military than we would be if we weren't in NATO - indeed, our defense expenditures would probably go up if we were to leave.

People ITT think that it is required by NATO to spend at least 3% of GDP on defense - that isn't true.

People ITT think that other NATO members aren't paying what is required by NATO - that isn't true either.

People ITT think that the US is paying for other members - that isn't true either.
Posted by Zgeo
Baja Oklahoma
Member since Jul 2021
2308 posts
Posted on 3/2/25 at 11:53 am to
Drop NATO like a hot potato….

Keep the UN but cut our contribution in half. I am sure there is enOUGH waste and fraud that we can get the USA contribution down to about 320million a year…UN is a useful idiot, and a place to talk and give our viewpoint….PLUS we are on the Security Council with veto power unlike most countries…
This post was edited on 3/2/25 at 12:10 pm
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram