Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Either bomb them back to the stone age or get out

Posted on 5/24/26 at 8:17 am
Posted by geauxtigers87
Louisiana
Member since Mar 2011
27444 posts
Posted on 5/24/26 at 8:17 am
We fricked up the strategic advantage when we had them on the ropes at the start of this now it's we do have a deal no we dont have a deal all the while they are getting resupplied by the Russians and Chinese.

This will be the biggest misstep Trump has done and it was totally unforced.
Posted by Lsut81
Member since Jun 2005
85144 posts
Posted on 5/24/26 at 8:23 am to
quote:

This will be the biggest misstep Trump has done and it was totally unforced.


Shut up with your TDS and go pay your penance at the gas station!

Sincerely,

Poli Board


Posted by TakingStock
Member since Jun 2009
7437 posts
Posted on 5/24/26 at 8:25 am to
quote:

We fricked up the strategic advantage when we had them on the ropes at the start of this now it's we do have a deal no we dont have a deal all the while they are getting resupplied by the Russians and Chinese. This will be the biggest misstep Trump has done and it was totally unforced.


If we agree to this “deal” then this may go down as one of the greatest foreign policy miscalculations in history. Truly snatching defeat from the jaws of victory type stuff.
Posted by The Baker
This is fine.
Member since Dec 2011
20390 posts
Posted on 5/24/26 at 8:26 am to
quote:

This will be the biggest misstep Trump has done and it was totally unforced.


TDS is strong with this one
Posted by H newman
Member since Oct 2021
2132 posts
Posted on 5/24/26 at 8:28 am to
It wouldn't take much to put them back on the ropes. The only way we come out of this clean is to kill all leadership and military. Let the people take over. Keep the soh open and wash our hands of the rest.
Posted by Forever
Member since Dec 2019
6937 posts
Posted on 5/24/26 at 8:29 am to
Aren’t you one of the morons who was calling everyone who disagreed with Trump on another middle eastern offensive a liberal? He won the negotiation, got what he wanted, and was right to pull out, you pussy blue haired Democrat crybaby. Go vote for Meghan McCain next time if you want more slush fund forever wars
Posted by Ricardo
Member since Sep 2016
6503 posts
Posted on 5/24/26 at 8:35 am to
The goal was never to win, because winning looks like genocide and too many people are uncomfortable with that.

Instead, we are in the midst of our own genocide and everyone is slowly walking into it because, "muh GDP."
Posted by tigersbh
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2005
13166 posts
Posted on 5/24/26 at 8:35 am to
We can bomb them all we want, their leadership still won’t quit. They don’t care how many of their people die. We can either go with this agreement, go in with ground forces and lose a few thousand people, or nuke them. I think we have to go with the first option.
Posted by SallysHuman
Lady Palmetto Bug
Member since Jan 2025
21976 posts
Posted on 5/24/26 at 8:37 am to
quote:

I think we have to go with the first option.


Third option is starting to look nice.
Posted by Icansee4miles
Trolling the Tickfaw
Member since Jan 2007
32266 posts
Posted on 5/24/26 at 8:42 am to
Why not both?
Posted by funnystuff
Member since Nov 2012
9150 posts
Posted on 5/24/26 at 8:48 am to
Never once in human history has an air campaign succeeded at instituting a regime change. Stop buying the hype on this strategy, it’s a non starter.

If the goal is regime change, boots on the ground is the only way to accomplish that. And most Americans appear unwilling to pay that price.
Posted by Lou the Jew from LSU
Member since Oct 2006
5424 posts
Posted on 5/24/26 at 8:50 am to
If they don’t care how many of them die, why should we?
Posted by davyjones
NELA
Member since Feb 2019
36832 posts
Posted on 5/24/26 at 8:53 am to
Our people’s highest hopes were that air campaign etc would eventually translate into mutiny amongst the citizenry, then boil over into a revolution and regime change scenario. That was the ultimate regime change strategy. Not a missile or bomb that’s specifically called the “Regime Change Bomb.”
Posted by jizzle6609
Houston
Member since Jul 2009
20180 posts
Posted on 5/24/26 at 8:56 am to
quote:

got what he wanted, and was right to pull out


We’ve all felt this way brother.

Here here.
Posted by weagle1999
Member since May 2025
3007 posts
Posted on 5/24/26 at 9:06 am to
quote:

unforced


Hot take: We stopped because we got too low on munitions.
Posted by Ricardo
Member since Sep 2016
6503 posts
Posted on 5/24/26 at 9:15 am to
We stopped because ground invasion was never on the menu. The strategy was, "Shock and Awe" all over again.

Some people never learn. You either go in with the intention to crush your enemy until there is nothing left or you waste a lot of resources with the hope of re-calibrating some trade deals with the people standing on the sidelines.

This is all about demonstrating how cool our weapons are (for future buyers) and making money off of trade deals.

Busting up BRICS is a key component of this whole operation.
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
55653 posts
Posted on 5/24/26 at 9:26 am to
quote:

If we agree to this “deal” then this may go down as one of the greatest foreign policy miscalculations in history.

How is it that you know what this “deal” is and I don’t?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram