- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Dominion lawsuits against Powell, Lindell and Rudy move ahead---this should be interesting
Posted on 8/13/21 at 4:41 am to dukkbill
Posted on 8/13/21 at 4:41 am to dukkbill
quote:12(b)(6) motions are mostly perfunctory, and it would probably be close to legal malpractice to forego seeking dismissal at an early stage.
they should not have even presented the Motion to Dismiss
I'm interested to see if/when they use any anti-SLAPP defenses going forward. Been a while since I've used those myself, so I'm a little rusty on application/timing. To the best of my memory, it can be used at pretty much any time, although it's usually engaged prophylactically.
1
Posted on 8/13/21 at 4:44 am to I B Freeman
quote:
I suspect Dominion is not interested in a settlement--they are going to want to get in front of a jury and make the three defendants put up or shut up under oath
...without having to go through discovery and end up showing how rigged a black box they sold interested parties.
Posted on 8/13/21 at 4:51 am to I B Freeman
This pretty much sums it up:
Posted on 8/13/21 at 5:47 am to boosiebadazz
Ever hear of a spoliation claim?
If they had the evidence and it was in their possession ie their machines and the evidence is gone, the jury will be instructed that the information contained is presumed to be against the party that had the information
At some point all those machines will have to be examined.
If they had the evidence and it was in their possession ie their machines and the evidence is gone, the jury will be instructed that the information contained is presumed to be against the party that had the information
At some point all those machines will have to be examined.
This post was edited on 8/13/21 at 5:49 am
Posted on 8/13/21 at 5:54 am to TBoy
quote:
Dominion has the fact
Actually, no they don’t.
But don’t let your ignorance stop you... it never has
Posted on 8/13/21 at 10:33 am to I B Freeman
So now we get discovery?
Posted on 8/13/21 at 10:38 am to honeybadger07
Yes.
Here's why. They can not claim that their systems don't do "XXXX" Without showing it.
It's not their words. It's an accusation that was made. And the only way to prove it false is via actions.
Here's why. They can not claim that their systems don't do "XXXX" Without showing it.
It's not their words. It's an accusation that was made. And the only way to prove it false is via actions.
Posted on 8/13/21 at 10:39 am to dafif
quote:ABSOLUTELY
Ever hear of a spoliation claim?
If they had the evidence and it was in their possession ie their machines and the evidence is gone, the jury will be instructed that the information contained is presumed to be against the party that had the information
At some point all those machines will have to be examined.
CHEATING IS NOT WINNING. Democrats need demonstration of this.
Posted on 8/13/21 at 10:48 am to I B Freeman
quote:
I B Freeman
You are such an disingenuous cock sucker
frick you and the rest of the liberal pussies that have infested our once great country
Posted on 8/13/21 at 10:49 am to TheRouxGuru
quote:
You are such an disingenuous cock sucker
Sounds like Mike Lindell is the disingenuous cock sucker lmao...muh data packets!!!!
Posted on 8/13/21 at 10:52 am to I B Freeman
this board will never back down, these 3 fine individuals are heros. Doesnt matter if they back track in the case of Powell. Discovering will be interesting, if dominion wins this it want matter to this board, the whole system is curropt!
Posted on 8/13/21 at 11:07 am to Jjdoc
Jjdoc is a pedophile. He spends tons of time online, which pedophiles do. and he talks to anonymous strangers on the internet all day. Again this is a common pedophile activity. He even spends time talking and sending messages about children in the poliboard
Do prove us wrong JJ. Show us how many kids you didn't diddle.
quote:
Message
Dominion lawsuits against Powell, Lindell and Rudy move ahead---this should be interesting by Jjdoc
Yes.
Here's why. They can not claim that their systems don't do "XXXX" Without showing it.
It's not their words. It's an accusation that was made. And the only way to prove it false is via actions.
Do prove us wrong JJ. Show us how many kids you didn't diddle.
Posted on 8/13/21 at 11:20 am to I B Freeman
Dems are jackasses.
Every last one of them.
Every last one of them.
Posted on 8/13/21 at 11:24 am to Jjdoc
quote:
Here's why. They can not claim that their systems don't do "XXXX" Without showing it.
It's not their words. It's an accusation that was made. And the only way to prove it false is via actions.
quote:
A presumption of innocence means that any defendant in a criminal trial is assumed to be innocent until they have been proven guilty. As such, a prosecutor is required to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the person committed the crime if that person is to be convicted. To do so, proof must be shown for every single element of a crime. That being said, a presumption of innocence does not guarantee that a person will remain free until their trial has concluded. In some circumstances, a person can be held in custody.
Posted on 8/13/21 at 12:24 pm to hubertcumberdale
He didn't even bother to refute me. Definitely into children.
Posted on 8/13/21 at 12:33 pm to FCP
quote:
I'm interested to see if/when they use any anti-SLAPP defenses going forward
The Sydney/Rudy/Mike cases are in Federal Court in DC. There is no Fed anti-SLAPP and the circuits are split on applying state anti-SLAPP to a fed case. The DC Circuit just ruled in Tah vs Global Witness that DC's anti-SLAPP statute conflicts with FRCP and thus can not be applied.*
The remaining four cases were filed in DE which has fairly narrow anti-SLAPP law.
* I will say the DC Circuits opinion regarding malice (NYT v Sullivan) in the Tah ruling may be an obstacle for Dominion at least in the appeals phase, if it comes to that.
Posted on 8/13/21 at 12:44 pm to dafif
quote:
Ever hear of a spoliation claim?
If they had the evidence and it was in their possession ie their machines and the evidence is gone, the jury will be instructed that the information contained is presumed to be against the party that had the information
There is no question Rule 37 issues will come up from both sides. I think one of the big issues may well be the possession issue on the Dominion side ie who has had possession and the CoC.
Posted on 8/13/21 at 9:05 pm to I B Freeman
quote:
She and the other defendants may well have taken advantage of the emotions of the Trumpkins.
That’s not how it works. We’re not Dim’s acting on emotions and we’re not Trumpkin’s, we’re freedom loving Americans
You fricking communist
Posted on 8/13/21 at 9:22 pm to I B Freeman
quote:
She and the other defendants may well have taken advantage of the emotions of the Trumpkins.
So these attorneys, knowing full well that a lawsuit against them was a real liklihood, made the conscious decision that the potential windfall of "emotional Trumpkin" donations was just too great to pass up, and dove right in with their allegations and statements about Dominion anyway? They estimated the donation windfall to easily outweigh the risk of potentially hefty monetary damages entered against them? Seems like a pretty tough sell right there.
Posted on 8/13/21 at 9:24 pm to I B Freeman
Throwing Powell, Lindell and Rudy into the briar patch.
* excellent *
* excellent *
Page 4 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News