- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 6/25/26 at 8:27 pm to wookalar1013
China Insider?
As a bonafide, America hating communist, you should be happy with a Chinese source.
As a bonafide, America hating communist, you should be happy with a Chinese source.
Posted on 6/25/26 at 8:28 pm to the808bass
quote:
Why don’t you explain how it worked here.
I’m going to bow out of this and let someone else do it. I’m just going to say something I’ll regret and feel bad like the last time I got into it with someone who isn’t all there.
Posted on 6/25/26 at 8:59 pm to VOR
quote:
Some of you will believe the election was “stolen until the day you die.
It was 100% stolen.
Posted on 6/25/26 at 9:00 pm to hawgfaninc
Yep. Something's up. Now a reverse lawsuit.
Posted on 6/25/26 at 9:23 pm to VOR
quote:
Some of you will believe the election was “stolen until the day you die. But it wasn’t and Biden was elected. This fantasy has become tired and boring. The books will record this episode as one of those curious, quirky events of U.S.history. There will be some discussion of how a president intentionally created skepticism surrounding our democratic elections and how Benjamin Franklin was prescient with his “if you can keep it” remark…
Biden won one bellwether county and lost house seats. He needed weeks of absentee ballots post Election Day.
Your party of democracy didn’t even let you vote on your candidate.
Maybe sit this one out chief.
Posted on 6/25/26 at 9:23 pm to Placekicker
quote:
The intentional errors lead to bulk adjudication of ballots with no oversight, lead to bulk adjudication of ballots with no oversight, no transparency, and no audit trail
Yeah
But does it lead to bulk adjudication of ballots with no oversight?
Posted on 6/25/26 at 9:24 pm to billjamin
quote:
I’m going to bow out of this and let someone else do it.
Posted on 6/25/26 at 9:25 pm to hawgfaninc
So who gets the 5 grand?
Boossie who really is a real lawyer told me 5k is the max settlement rate.
Boossie who really is a real lawyer told me 5k is the max settlement rate.
Posted on 6/25/26 at 9:32 pm to hawgfaninc
The Fox News one for $700 million might be next
Posted on 6/25/26 at 9:36 pm to billjamin
quote:
I’m going to bow out of this and let someone else do it. I’m just going to say something I’ll regret and feel bad like the last time I got into it with someone who isn’t all there.
This is lame as frick. You just spent an entire page telling him he doesn’t know what he’s talking about and he finally asks you to explain and you “bow out”.
This isn’t an agree to disagree situation, go all the way.
For the record both of you are being vague in your positions.
Posted on 6/25/26 at 9:39 pm to OceanMan
quote:
For the record both of you are being vague in your positions.
Saying there was a chance that a proxy value was assigned during valuation isn’t being vague. It’s reality. He’s playing around and it’s not worth going into any further detailed responses. I can’t have a serious conversation with someone who doesn’t understand the difference between dropping a case and dropping a case with a settlement. I’m content letting him think what he wants because it’s meaningless.
I have no problems engaging in a thoughtful conversation about what the possible transactional structures could be and how you account for value in pending litigation in an acquisition. But there has to be a basic understanding of reality for that to happen.
This post was edited on 6/25/26 at 9:49 pm
Posted on 6/25/26 at 10:07 pm to the808bass
quote:
Detroit, MI (TCF Center): Tens of thousands of ballots at 3:30 AM with no chain of custody. Speckin Forensics report: ~20% of absentee ballots lacked required application.
Delaware County, PA: Officials tore machine tapes/return sheets and discarded them; data deemed “no audit value.”
Pennsylvania: 440,781 mail ballots with “status unknown” in EAVS data (exceeds 81,660 margin by 5:1+).
Milwaukee, WI: USB drive with absentee data lost custody on election night; unexplained 143,379-vote upload at 3:26 AM.
Wisconsin: Dominion reseller retained ballots in Minnesota and refused subpoenas; Green Bay had non-government actor control over tabulators/ballots and hidden Wi-Fi.
Georgia: 35 tabulator cards swapped mid-election with no custody; closing tapes handled by surrogates; Dominion personnel controlled systems.
Industry-wide: Scanners use “color dropout” deleting red-ink markings; test ballots included in results (e.g., NYC primary example of 135,000).
Posted on 6/25/26 at 11:14 pm to junkyarddawg3
quote:
The lawsuit was dismissed with prejudice.
The parties reached a confidential settlement.
Both can be true at the same time.
The company and Lindell agreed to a dismissal of the $1.3 billion defamation suit and agreed that "each party shall bear its own attorneys’ fees, expenses, and costs," according to a court filing late Wednesday.
Posted on 6/25/26 at 11:37 pm to ChatGPT of LA
81 million votes for Biden…..
:rotflmao:
Posted on 6/26/26 at 12:06 am to Placekicker
Has has our resident poster SFP chimed in yet with his computer expertise?
Posted on 6/26/26 at 7:17 am to the808bass
quote:Dominion sued Lindell.
Why don’t you explain how it worked here.
The value of that lawsuit is estimated through the analysis of many factors: (1) probability of prevailing, (2) likely judgment amount, (3) the judgement amount that is actually recoverable, and (4) the amount of time until payment of judgment.
Dominion's Probability of Prevailing: Near Certain. The probability of Dominion prevailing against Lindell seems nearly certain. In the Newsmax lawsuit, Judge Davis ruled that Newsmax committed defamation per se against Dominion in each of the 19 alleged statements. Last year in Denver, a jury issued a $2.3 million judgment against Lindell after finding he had defamed a former Dominion director with similar claims of election fraud. Both Fox and Newsmax settled Dominion's cases against them for millions of dollars, far more than nuisance costs. Clearly, both Fox and Newsmax believed Dominion's claims had significant merit.
Likely Judgment Amount: $100+ million Fox agreed to pay Dominion $787.5 million to settle Dominion's $1.6 billion defamation lawsuit. Similarly, Newsmax agreed to pay $67 million to settle Dominion's $1.6 billion defamation lawsuit against it. Eric Coomer, a single individual, received a $2.3 million judgment against Lindell for similar defamation claims. The likely judgment amount of Dominion's claims against Lindell would be $100 million or more.
Judgement Amount that Is Actually Recoverable: $0 While testifying on June 9, 2025, during his Denver defamation trial, Lindell stated that he was millions of dollars in debt due to legal costs, indicating a negative net worth of at least several million dollars as of mid-2025. Thus, it is unlikely that Dominion will recover any amount from Lindell regardless of the stated amount of a court judgment. A $1 billion judgment that is not recoverable is not worth the paper it's printed on.
Amount of Time until Payment of Judgment: 2+ years If Dominion would have proceed to trial against Lindell, it might have been a year or more before the trial was conducted and at least another year until the appeal process was complete.
Thus, when Liberty Vote, founded and operated by former Republican election official Scott Leiendecker, purchased Dominion in October 2025, four months after Lindell testified that he was millions of dollars in debt, the proxy value of Dominion's claims against Lindell were likely little more than $0.
The standard settlement process includes confidentiality, dismissal with prejudice, and each party bears its own costs. I have been involved in the settlement of hundreds of cases. Nearly all of them included a confidentiality clause, the plaintiff's agreement to dismiss with prejudice (which means the plaintiff cannot file the lawsuit again), and a clause that each party will bear its own attorney fees and court costs. The idea of settlement is to put the case and the feud to bed. No talking about the claims, no refiling the lawsuit, and no fighting about how much the attorney's fees are.
This post was edited on 6/26/26 at 8:02 am
Posted on 6/26/26 at 7:28 am to hawgfaninc
They probably never intended to take it all the way. The point was to discredit him and silence him...which it absolutely did.
But it's not lawfare. That's not a real thing. Like Antifa, it's just an idea.
But it's not lawfare. That's not a real thing. Like Antifa, it's just an idea.
Posted on 6/26/26 at 7:45 am to billjamin
quote:
If you really believe this was a win for him then keep on keeping on bro. I’m not going to argue with clear delusion.
Dominion paid their own legal fees. They didn’t even get legal fees covered in the settlement. What is it you think they got?
Back to top



3











