re: DOJ tells Mueller his testimony must remain "within boundaries" of report

quote:

---

Hmmmm,an admission that there is a lot to hide.

But we shouldn't be concerned about that.

---

Anything that matters in this testimony should be in the report that he spent 2 years turning over every possible stone to make.

There is zero reason to look at or question anything else.

Is this going to hamstring the Republicans more than the Democrats?

I can hear all the grandstanding for media sound bites questions posed by the anti American socialist, liberal, progressives.

It will just make Mueller look worse if he refuses to answer every Republican question

And R's can't back down. Mueller needs to exposed as the POS and fraud he is

It's an admission that the report is the report as Mueller has said. He had over 2 years. Unlimited funding. Virtually unlimited staffing. Full co-operation from all agencies inc the WH and got millions upon millions of documents. Interviewed and served thousands of witnesses. Arrested tons of people inc some innocents who were then held hostage and threatened with ruined families and jail and delivered some sentences but not one was able to tell him anything about the Russian-Trump hoax or any other chargeable activity simply because there was none. And nothing of real significance as to high crimes to talk about. They were making perjury cases out of memory loss or simple mis-statement so no one was gonna lie to Mueller. There simply was no there, there.

So at this point are you wishing or encouraging Mueller to "change his mind and alter the facts" or say he messed up and what he wrote is not true. The report is the report. He was never rushed nor badgered for it. In fact if he changed his mind and refuted his report he might be in line for perjuring himself and this is maybe a tiny reminder among friends. Watch yourself in front of those lawyers and slicks who are looking for any opening and will do to you what you perhaps did to others, hold you hostage. Mueller is no fan of the president, he loathes him because they are different. And DJT is a non-political outsider who didn't deserve to be president in many old line Republican eyes. And he was driven with a zealot's intensity to find wrong doing but couldn't to his everlasting dismay. No one has ever brought up anything on the president except he is a loose talker and exaggerates. As do all pols. The professional women thing is minor league stuff in that crowd. JFK was horrible, Clinton was a criminal nd had he not been president would have likely been a serial rapist. Obama just lied. And was a sneak. Trump is open, too open.

At this point the Mueller report ship has sailed. The Dems are up to one of three things. String out the sideshow as long as possible. Or protect themselves by satisfying some radical huge donors who refuse to let reality set in. Or trap Mueller into making some ambiguous or reckless statement that they can use for political damage. The best thing for Trump is for the house to open proceedings and immediately get shot down in the senate and get a hell of a boost and re-elected. But PEACH MINT is still a possibility. Removal is a non-starter. But as dumb as many of the Democrat house members are I'm not sure but what some think their PEACH MINT is an end all, that's the president has got to leave if they say so. I know some dumasses here in Georgia who think that. LOL!

The Democrats are going to shreek about this despite the fact that the scope of that investigation was changed so many times that it's an irrelevant rule. They studied this guy's entire life between the FBI, the special council, the Clinton campaign, and the SDNY. They would have impreached the guy the second they had any material evidence that he did something illegal that would be winnable in court.

quote:

---

It will just make Mueller look worse if he refuses to answer every Republican question

---

Hard to imagine the mighty Meowler looking worse than he did in his last, no questions presser, but I do not expect swag and swagger on Wednesday.



Much to TriggeredNDC09's and Decadiddlers' chagrin.

Good. If he had anything else to add he should have included it in his report.

Why are there boundaries to the report?Is there something to hide?

We won't learn anything from a hearing that is hand tied.

Barr needs to grow a pair.

quote:

---

Is there something to hide?

---

Again/

quote:

---

Riiight

That's why Trump said screw attorney-client privilege, if Mueller wants to interview my attorney, WH Counsel McGahn, let him interview him.

In the end Weissman, a malignant leftist, combed over every scintilla of evidence you're bitching about. He still could not manufacture charges. By definition, everything you claim "is a lot to hide" was fully accessible to Weissmann & Co.

If Weissmann and a dozen top liberal partisan attorneys could not squeeze out so much as one overreaching charge, what in the world do you think pea-brains like Schiff and Nadler could offer?

---