- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: DOJ spying on politicians? Bondi caught with a print out of Pramila's search history
Posted on 2/11/26 at 8:01 pm to Powerman
Posted on 2/11/26 at 8:01 pm to Powerman
If using a company issued computer, then the company can take that laptop at anytime, or remotely login, and access your search history and anything else they like.
Would expect as many safeguards as possible on a govt issued laptop.
Would expect as many safeguards as possible on a govt issued laptop.
1
Posted on 2/11/26 at 8:01 pm to Powerman
This has been going since Hoover ran the FBI
Posted on 2/11/26 at 8:02 pm to Powerman
quote:
Why would she need to being a search history cheat sheet to the meeting?
Why not?
You think the congress critters don't have staff and crib sheets?
Posted on 2/11/26 at 8:02 pm to Powerman
You blew years of this shite.
Posted on 2/11/26 at 8:03 pm to RummelTiger
Right. But in that case shouldn't we have all of Bondi's communications? Because she's the one that's looking like the cover up queen right now
Posted on 2/11/26 at 8:04 pm to Powerman
Poweretard the stupid version of SFP
Posted on 2/11/26 at 8:05 pm to Powerman
FISA works both ways.
These people have all been under surveillance for a long time now. This should confirm this for people. She "should go" because you're frickin afraid.
If you're scared, just say you're scared.
These people have all been under surveillance for a long time now. This should confirm this for people. She "should go" because you're frickin afraid.
If you're scared, just say you're scared.
Posted on 2/11/26 at 8:05 pm to Powerman
quote:
Powerman
Posted on 2/11/26 at 8:05 pm to Powerman
quote:oh so now you melting on ‘look bad’
You can't fathom in any way how this could look bad?
Go change your tampon baw
Posted on 2/11/26 at 8:06 pm to Powerman
quote:
That was wrong and this is also wrong
On a basic level I do not disagree - but we’ve reached a point (already passed it sometime back) where one side has already virtually disregarded all rules. They are playing to win. Permanently.
Does the other side continue to play by the rules hoping it will set a good example? For who, the other side? They already don’t care about rules.
For future historians who can say “well that side eventually lost the country for good but they at least played by the rules”?
Posted on 2/11/26 at 8:07 pm to Powerman
Is this new someho? How many phone records did jack Smith pull in?
It's bothering you now. Search history? Must be a slow day.
It's bothering you now. Search history? Must be a slow day.
Posted on 2/11/26 at 8:08 pm to Powerman
Why did you leave this out of your OP:
quote:
An update to this story clarifies that the search history documents were pulled from a public database.
Posted on 2/11/26 at 8:12 pm to Powerman
quote:
That was wrong and this is also wrong
I get what you are saying but if they are connected to any of the actions and plots against a sitting POTUS and/or the party's candidate, then they should be legitimate suspects in a crime and can be surveilled, eh?
Posted on 2/11/26 at 8:14 pm to Powerman
quote:
Right. But in that case shouldn't we have all of Bondi's communications? Because she's the one that's looking like the cover up queen right now
Isn’t that apples and oranges?
All Pam had was search history, but you think we should have all communication?
I’m sure most everything she does would be considered confidential or a matter of national security, so you know as well as I do that there’s zero chance her communications would be made public.
That said, I’d imagine if there was a need, then someone would be able to get what they need.
Posted on 2/11/26 at 8:14 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:quote:
Why did you leave this out of your OP:
quote:
An update to this story clarifies that the search history documents were pulled from a public database.
quote:
Powerman
Posted on 2/11/26 at 8:26 pm to Powerman
quote:
The document listed out at least eight different files from the Justice Department's trove of Epstein records, including their file numbers and brief descriptions of their contents,
I think you are conflating a google search history with the search history more than likely related to searching and viewing of the unreacted documents that are in the possession of the DoJ. They are not the same
This post was edited on 2/11/26 at 8:47 pm
Posted on 2/11/26 at 8:59 pm to Powerman
You leftist figs had nothing to say as Garland was spying on every American. Cry us a river, you leftist piece of shite
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News