re: Dispensationalism is a Heresy

quote:

---

Replacement theology is how they can just throw the baby out with the bathwater. When God says a covenant is Eternal, he means it, it is unconditional.

---

The only ones replacing theology are the reformers. The entirety of the New Testament explains that the church is Israel, but unfortunately there's tens of thousands of denominations that use eisegesis instead of exegesis to read their Scofield Bible so they can pick and choose. The 2000 year old Orthodox church is clear on this, and up until the 19th century dispensationalism was an unfounded theology. It's man made, and it's a heresy. History and facts don't care about what Pastor Tony at the New Redeemer Reformed Baptist Church of Non-Denominational The Eucharist is Just Symbolic Church of Christ of Dallas has to say about it. It's made up nonsense, but unfortunately that nonsense has caused us an immense amount of suffering, suffocating debt, endless wars, and millions dead to do the bidding of another country that quite literally despises the religion of this country. The state of Israel is a sacrilegious apostate blasphemer of Christ and the gospel. They are the old covenant, Christ made all things new.



Worship The Christ, not the government of Tel Aviv.

quote:

---

Stop bashing Catholics because Catholicism has nothing to do with this debate. You are trying turn this thread into another round of Catholic bashing.

This foreign policy notion that US Mid East foreign policy should be controlled by the Book of Genesis is a debate totally within Protestant circles.

I oppose the notion.

---

Requires boldness to take this stance from the board's leading Protestant basher

quote:

---

So bashing Christian dispensationalist is ok to be bashed??

---

Can you plainly state your position. Practically how does it look?

I am not a Catholic ftr

People that believe in this dispensationalism don't even realized they are getting played. Zionists and "Christian" politicians (also Zionists) use it as a caudal to promote war through out the ME and extract tax dollars from willing Christians. When you see a politicians kissing the wall, bad sign. That is satan's demons doing work.

He rose them up. They didn't exist before Abraham. He made them from nothing specifically to be His people.“(Quote wtt)

Am I wrong in assuming that Abraham was the first to present the Idea of a Singular God? And that Jesus added to that Idea by amending it to include a Triune Godhead? Of the which he claimed to be 1/3 of? Albeit professing to be subordinate to the ‘Father’, yet being concurrently ”One with the Father “.

The Jews rejected Jesus Christ and have paid a heavy price thereafter. With likely more pain to come.

Jesus said “I am the way, the TRUTH and the life”, and I think that it will be the Truth that appears a second time. At least “for them who look for his coming “. The rest will perceive the Empirical version of reality while the Children are “changed” into Spiritual Reality.

This Universe is either Spiritual based, or not. Though there is subjective choice to determine one’s ultimate subjective reality. To each their own.

quote:

---

I don’t know what “believes in feminism” means.

---

You made it pretty clear on previous threads.

quote:

---

I believe that women should have the same rights as men.

---

Yeah, it went past that on those threads. I seem to recall you ridiculing the idea that women and men are optimized for different roles in the family and society, even though the reality of that situation is easily observable by anyone who isn't biased. And if I remember incorrectly, you can use this as an opportunity to correct me. Just post that you think women and men are optimized for different roles in the family and society and that society works best when women take care of what happens inside the household and men take care of what happens outside the household.

By the way, no one in those earlier threads was saying that women shouldn't legally be allowed to pretend to be men, just that they shouldn't. So no, we weren't talking about legal rights.

quote:

---

I think you have to agree that my view is fairly straightforward and has no need of seances.

---

No, I don't have to agree with that. The differences between women and men were self-evident to all humanity throughout all of human history until when?

Until feminism.

It is an objective fact that feminism convinced people of things that run contrary to simple observation about men and women. The philosophy was indeed necessary in order to accomplish that. And the authors claim they got the philosophy from spirits during seances. So yeah, your (previously stated) view does need seances to get there.

quote:

---

The latest “advances” in feminism seem off the rails to me.

---

There isn't anything happening now that wasn't written about in either 1st wave or very early 2nd wave feminism. Including transgenderism.

All you're seeing is that the ideas are being taken to their logical conclusions now, but they were always there. Like Bill Maher when he laments that the Democrats have gone crazy but can't understand that they always were. They just haven't always taken the principles behind their ideas out to their furthest logical conclusion until lately.

quote:

---

CorchJay

---

You're all kinds of messed up.

Simply a passing observation or two [in general]

1. If obsolete, why devote the book of Hebrews in Holy Scripture? It clearly addresses the fulfillment and superiority of Jesus to the former. However, if the former is inconsequential to the present, then why voice?

2. Of course the Hebrews of old were chosen -- chosen to bear witness to the one True God

3. Is Israel - of today - of import? I would think so for I believe it is the only nation [geographical] that has been reconstituted in the annals of history. If true, that merits discussion - is ground zero for Judaism, Christianity and Islam [to discount this significance is foolhardy]

4. Today's church is a continuation and manifestation of the mind of God. We, for we are finite, parse it as we seek to understand the infinite - past, present and future

If it's new it ain't true. Dispensational "eschatology" is very new.