re: Did Cheif Justice Roberts just wade into the waters on Boasberg?

quote:

---

So your premise is wrong.

---

I learned that just now, so my mind is changed. If Congress can impeach the President, then the process should exist for Federal judges. Now…if only there was a way to recall members of Congress….

I’ll leave my original statement up there to show my ignorance and that I learned something new today.

quote:

---

time for crazy laura loomer to zero in on roberts

---

She's definitely one of the last of the investigative journalist out there.

Who are legally designated as members of a terrorist organization no less

TDS is out of control, I have never seen a president get railroaded on every aspect of their platform before

quote:

---

And this boys and girls is why we have separation of powers and checks and balances. When 1 branch becomes unhinged, you need the others to check it.

---

And it's not the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court's job to hold the legislative accountable for impeachment of judges. He's wading into waters that he doesn't belong (the impeachment process).

What was the circumstances for Roberts input on Boasberg? Was he speaking somewhere and asked the question or did he offer up his thought completely on his own?

I do see on the quote provided Roberts fails to mention the full bias of Boasberg court history and only makes Trump's comments directed at the latest deportation order. I think that is intentional of Roberts and he is playing politics here.

quote:

---

You can't impeach a federal judge simply because you don't like his ruling.

---

How far does that extend? Their job is to make rulings; if they consistently make bad rulings, at what point are they impeached?

quote:

---

For more than two centuries, it has been established that impeachment is not an appropriate response to disagreement concerning a judicial decision. The normal appellate review process exists for that purpose."

---

Well CJ, that doesn't mean it cannot be used for such a purpose. In fact, it has been established for just that long that impeachment is inherently a political mechanism. Moreover, where a judge is so outside of his/her constitutional authority in a ruling, that does not constituted "good behavior" for a lifetime appointment.

Trump should respond by tweeting out the illegal adoption (not immoral, illegal) of John Robert's kids by insinuation.

quote:

---

Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts just fired back at Trump after Trump

---

quote:

---

it has been established that impeachment

---

The executive does not have the authority to impeach. This is a legislative branch function.

When Roberts responds to Trump on a technical issue such as impeachment he should respond to the appropriate branch of government. Mike Johnson and the legislative branch is the appropriate branch in this case. Otherwise this is a dead tell that his response is political and SOTUS needs to keep it apolitical. By being political this is grounds for the legislative branch to impeach.

quote:

---

Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts just fired back at Trump after Trump called for the impeachment of Judge Boasberg (who tried to require Trump to keep illegal gang members in the U.S.).

"For more than two centuries, it has been established that impeachment is not an appropriate response to disagreement concerning a judicial decision. The normal appellate review process exists for that purpose."

Source: POLITICO

---

The Dims/DC Uniparty Globalists understand all they have left to preserve their political power and control is the Gaslight Media and the judiciary, a judiciary that as a majority is decidedly on the left side of the political spectrum. This fight to end Cultural Marxism and Globalism is far from over. Those who have spent decades saturating and embedding their ideology deep into academia, government and the judiciary are not going to surrender because the American people voted for change via Donald Trump, one side is going to win and one side is going to lose......period!