- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Dems lawfare is picking up.
Posted on 2/11/25 at 9:39 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 2/11/25 at 9:39 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:frick off
SlowFlowPro
0
Posted on 2/11/25 at 9:39 am to SlowFlowPro
You are known here man. We all know. Hell it doesn't take new posters long at all to graps what you are.
Posted on 2/11/25 at 9:40 am to oklahogjr
quote:
Ah yes the things I agree with are valid and anything else is meritless approach...
This is typically where a discussion of defining "lawfare" ends up.
quote:
I don't have one. It's not my term.
The biggest hurdle for those who like to use it is related to legitimacy. When they start attacking legitimacy blindly, it devolves down into a "It's lawfare when done to my team, but not lawfare when my team does it to the out-group". That's basically the general definition of its use by the MAGA sect (and why they give definitions so rarely and defend the rare offerings even less often).
LINK
Posted on 2/11/25 at 9:40 am to Jjdoc
quote:
. You are defending their actions.
I'm not defending any specific actions of any judge.
quote:
the Court does not have the authority to ignore the constitution and assume the power of the Executive Branch.
So when courts enjoined the Biden vax mandates, you posted about the illegality of those acts in real time?
Posted on 2/11/25 at 9:40 am to SlowFlowPro
Sure slow. There is nothing different between forcing a medical procedure and culling a worthless government program. Nothing at all. They are the same thing. 
Posted on 2/11/25 at 9:41 am to SlowFlowPro
socialist...............active party taking place with Hillary, Soros , schiff using USAID
Posted on 2/11/25 at 9:41 am to Jjdoc
quote:
You are known here man
Clearly not by you, if you called me a "socialist"
quote:
Hell it doesn't take new posters long at all to graps what you are.
Usually they have to come to grips with what they are to understand what I am.
Posted on 2/11/25 at 9:41 am to Jjdoc
Next thing you know the courts will order the U.S. Army into Ukraine.
Posted on 2/11/25 at 9:43 am to Jjdoc
quote:
Judge Amy Berman Jackson
This one always seems to be involved in these types of lawfare activities.
Posted on 2/11/25 at 9:43 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Did you say the same thing when Biden's vax mandate was enjoined?
If the intent of the legal action is to shape political narratives via the media it's lawfare. If the intent is genuine legal recourse it is not lawfare.
The Trump bookkeeping case in NYC is a perfect example of lawfare. The intent was to label Trump a felon through the media by using the courts. The intent was not to prosecute a crime. No one in the history of NYC has been prosecuted with said crime and no DA would waste resources prosecuting such a small and esoteric crime.
Posted on 2/11/25 at 9:43 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Did you say the same thing when Biden's vax mandate was enjoined?
Did you stop beating your enjoined?
PS - It's like having Bill Maher on this board - except Pro is the contrarian w/ out the occasionally humor.
Posted on 2/11/25 at 9:43 am to TurkeyBaconLeg
quote:
They are going to lose at every turn when it goes up to the higher courts.
Trump will win every single one of them.
Yes, but the Leftist Judiciary's strategy is not necessarily to win on the merits, but, to delay implementation of reform until Trump runs out of time, due to loss of electoral power.
It's all they have, besides mass media propaganda.
Posted on 2/11/25 at 9:44 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Did you say the same thing when Biden's vax mandate was enjoined?
Not even close to the same thing as trying to limit the executive branch from their given functions
Posted on 2/11/25 at 9:44 am to SlowFlowPro
so you're equating making it mandatory to take a vaccine or else you can't work to...
auditing agencies to see where money has been spent
auditing agencies to see where money has been spent
Posted on 2/11/25 at 9:44 am to Jjdoc
Tyranny will never end until the tyrants fear the people
Posted on 2/11/25 at 9:45 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Did you say the same thing when Biden's vax mandate was enjoined?
Are you really f*cking comparing Trump running the Executive branch of the government as the elected president with Biden forcing people to get an experimental poison injected into their body that could have long-term health effects up to an including death?
Out of all the stupid f*cking retarded sh!t you’ve posted on this board, this is definitely in the top 1000.
Posted on 2/11/25 at 9:46 am to SlowFlowPro
One is defending a personal right to not be given a forced injection. So much for my body, my right.
One is telling the chief executive that he can’t decide who works in the executive branch.
In the second case, there is precedent for the executive branch to fire people. Bill Clinton did it. Reagan fired the air traffic controllers, Truman fired McArthur. The difference this time is that it is Trump.
One is telling the chief executive that he can’t decide who works in the executive branch.
In the second case, there is precedent for the executive branch to fire people. Bill Clinton did it. Reagan fired the air traffic controllers, Truman fired McArthur. The difference this time is that it is Trump.
Posted on 2/11/25 at 9:46 am to captainFid
quote:
except Pro is the contrarian w/ out the occasionally humor.
The frick?
Posted on 2/11/25 at 9:46 am to stout
quote:
Not even close to the same thing as trying to limit the executive branch from their given functions
Both were literally over limiting executive branch functions
Posted on 2/11/25 at 9:46 am to captainFid
quote:
w/ out the occasionally humor.
I don’t know man. His attempt to be funny is in a way that I find funny.
It’s funny trying to figure out if he thinks his attempt as humor was funny.
This post was edited on 2/11/25 at 9:55 am
Page 2 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News