- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Dems lawfare is picking up.
Posted on 2/11/25 at 10:08 am to Big Jim Slade
Posted on 2/11/25 at 10:08 am to Big Jim Slade
quote:
This one always seems to be involved in these types of lawfare activities.
A bitch or a colored person?
1
Posted on 2/11/25 at 10:11 am to Bunk Moreland
I don’t understand why both sides wouldn’t coordinate their own challenges with favorable judges to beat the opposition to the punch.
Posted on 2/11/25 at 10:12 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
except Pro is the contrarian w/ out the occasionally humor.
The frick?
Pro, we don't all get to type responses on our work computer at the Law Firm while simultaneously billing clients. Good for you though.
Posted on 2/11/25 at 10:14 am to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
The difference is "irreparable harm."
I'm not talking about the merits, though, only the power itself.
Posted on 2/11/25 at 10:16 am to Bjorn Cyborg
quote:
It's not irrelevant at all. It's crucial to the question
To the question of whether the existence of this power is good or bad? How?
quote:
But when a federal judge orders the stoppage of the firing of a single executive branch employee BY THE EXECUTIVE
That's getting into the merits, which is a different discussion than what my post covered.
I gave no commentary on the propriety (one way or the other) of the merits (in either case).
Posted on 2/11/25 at 10:17 am to captainFid
quote:
we don't all get to type responses on our work computer at the Law Firm while simultaneously billing clients. Good for you though.
That's bordering on per se defamation.
Posted on 2/11/25 at 10:19 am to TurkeyBaconLeg
quote:
They are going to lose at every turn when it goes up to the higher courts. Trump will win every single one of them.
And it sounds like a lot of this lawfare was funded through USAID.
With that shut down, it will be interesting to see how far they can go with lawfare before the tank runs empty.
Posted on 2/11/25 at 10:19 am to Jjdoc
She can wish in one hand and shart in the other. The fact remains Hampton Dellinger has been fired.
Posted on 2/11/25 at 10:20 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Both were literally over limiting executive branch functio
Sure but can there is a huge difference in the EB managing personnel and budgets vs mandating a vaccine. One is a right given to the EB and the other is an overreach.
Posted on 2/11/25 at 10:20 am to Jjdoc
Nothing new...began - at least - in the 70s
It is akin to the bad guy being shielded against the good guy
Typical Progressive horse$@#*
It is akin to the bad guy being shielded against the good guy
Typical Progressive horse$@#*
Posted on 2/11/25 at 10:22 am to Jjdoc
frick her.
Lock him out of his computer and the building.
Tenure of Office Act was declared unconstitutional.
Lock him out of his computer and the building.
Tenure of Office Act was declared unconstitutional.
Posted on 2/11/25 at 10:23 am to Jjdoc
"Lawfare? What's lawfare?" - Slow Mo Fo
Posted on 2/11/25 at 10:23 am to KCT
quote:
"Lawfare? What's lawfare?" - Slow Mo Fo
Bad thread to try that
Posted on 2/11/25 at 10:24 am to SlowFlowPro
This you?
Posted on 2/11/25 at 10:24 am to stout
quote:
Sure but can there is a huge difference in the EB managing personnel and budgets vs mandating a vaccine. One is a right given to the EB and the other is an overreach.
There are clearly differences in the merits, just like this EO and the birthright citizenship one. I was only discussing the judicial power itself, which JJ took issue with.
quote:
They are trying to assume power via courts.
His issue is with judicial power and his perception that it's encroaching on the executive. I'm just pointing out he didn't seem to have an issue when this power benefited his team.
Posted on 2/11/25 at 10:24 am to TurkeyBaconLeg
quote:
They are going to lose at every turn when it goes up to the higher courts. Trump will win every single one of them
Their goal isn't to win the cases. Their goal is to delay as much of Trump's agenda as they can and pray the mid-terms work out in their favor. As they usually do go against the party in the White House.
Posted on 2/11/25 at 10:25 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Bad thread to try that
It's never a bad time to tell the truth. You should give it a try sometime.
Posted on 2/11/25 at 10:25 am to udtiger
Yep
Or set up an office in Antarctica and send him there.
Or set up an office in Antarctica and send him there.
Posted on 2/11/25 at 10:27 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I'm not talking about the merits, though, only the power itself.
The courts have the power of judicial oversight. No one questions that. But it should be used to correct major oversight of constitutional issues.
Getting involved in personnel and operational decisions is a horrible precedent for the federal court system to get involved in.
Posted on 2/11/25 at 10:28 am to Bjorn Cyborg
quote:
The courts have the power of judicial oversight. No one questions that.
JJ was questioning it in OP, and that's specifically what I replied to
Page 4 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News