- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Democratic voters walk through the streets chanting "defund the police"
Posted on 6/28/21 at 11:54 pm to mike2019tiger
Posted on 6/28/21 at 11:54 pm to mike2019tiger
quote:
Relax, nobody in his or her right mind would defund the police.
You're right, but we're talking about liberals.
https://www.secureamericanow.org/cities_defunding_police
Posted on 6/29/21 at 12:00 am to LSUinMA
Oh my sweet lord, we have a Biden guy here. Not just a generic liberal who voted Biden bc of party loyalty but an actual bona fide fan of Biden lol. You’re like the only one. 
Posted on 6/29/21 at 12:01 am to biglego
quote:
Oh my sweet lord, we have a Biden guy here. Not just a generic liberal who voted Biden bc of party loyalty but an actual bona fide fan of Biden lol. You’re like the only one.
I will give zhe or zir credit for defending the guy. Most people are too embarrassed to do that.
Posted on 6/29/21 at 5:08 am to LSUinMA
quote:
Ah, criticism of not ascribing a policy that is absurd and that you yourself do not agree with. No, that’s not hypocritical at all. Well done.
If you actually believe that I believe that using English language properly is racist,you are a fool.
The sarcastic remark stemmed from a thread here:
TD thread exposing the foolishness from the left: this episode on grammar being racist
It is, however, what the left is telling us these days.
This post was edited on 6/29/21 at 5:52 am
Posted on 6/29/21 at 5:16 am to LSUinMA
quote:
It’s an interesting theory. You are missing one key component: motive. I don’t need to convince you. I don’t care if you are convinced
If you didn’t feel a need to convince people you wouldn’t have spent 9 hours yesterday responding to multiple posters.
Posted on 6/29/21 at 5:53 am to Jbird
Bail bond reform and replacing cops with "social workers" was the Left's response to police "brutality" and NOT promoted by any Republican I know of.
Posted on 6/29/21 at 7:00 am to LSUinMA
quote:
I don’t care if you are convinced. I have long sense accepted, probably before I posted anything today, that it would be impossible to convince you or anyone else who has already made up their minds about what they think they know.
This sad state of permanent victimhood needs to be addressed.
Posted on 6/29/21 at 7:06 am to LSUinMA
quote:
He doesn’t have handlers.
Who was putting him to bed at 9:15 am every day while he was “campaigning” last year?
Posted on 6/29/21 at 7:15 am to LSUinMA
quote:
I’m so sorry to disappoint you with my subpar intellectual ability.
This from someone who thinks that apostrophes make nouns plural rather than denote possession or the presence of a contraction.
Followed with:
quote:
. there’s not even relatively speaking that much support in the black community for defunding the police. but you persist in talking about the Democrats as if they are all one and the same.
So typical
Posted on 6/29/21 at 7:50 am to LSUinMA
quote:
1. His handlers don’t, not doesn’t. Maybe you should get basic grammar down before tackling public policy?
2. Handlers? Read a few books. Biden shoots his mouth off and has been a notoriously lacking in discipline candidate ever since he first ran for president in 1988. He doesn’t have handlers. That’s a tired narrative. If he had handlers, maybe he wouldn’t say stupid shite like he did the other day about the infrastructure bill.
3. He doesn’t support defunding the police. Again, there was $350 billion for law-enforcement in a bill that passed with no Republican votes.
The man can barely form a sentence. He has handlers. Don’t be dumb.
Your last point is a huge logical fallacy. The fact that this bill received no GOP backing had nothing to do with any funds going to Law Enforcement...but you knew that
Posted on 6/29/21 at 7:51 am to Jbird
Where is a truck when I need it
Posted on 6/29/21 at 8:00 am to Nguyener
quote:
This sad state of permanent victimhood needs to be addressed.
It was NINE HOURS of “Woe is me!” white liberal bullshite. I mean, if this thread were the victim Olympics, he would have medaled in the Democratic decathlon (events including:
(D)ismissive take on other opinions
(D)eflection of valid points
(D)erogatory takes on anything Trump
(D)isdain for all things MAGA
(D)erisive commentary on anything traditional
(D)etachment from reality
(D)ivisive rhetoric
(D)enigration of America values
(D)etracting “wrong think” via “brute force” posting
(D)eification of Biden / Harris
Oh, and just because he hates my prolific use of gifs:

Posted on 6/29/21 at 9:07 am to LSUinMA
I'm telling you there was no such directive to spend the money on law enforcement. You never responded to that. Now after the fact "circle back" girl and others are saying the republicans didn't support the slush bill so they were in support of defunding the police?? That's absolute insanity. Sane Americans see right through that. Can't create a new narrative after the fact when you see crime rise 300%.
Posted on 6/29/21 at 9:26 am to LSUinMA
quote:That's a typical misleading statement made by a "politician" (liar). That was the total amount for the state and local governments to use for ALL their projected needs!
There was $350 billion for law-enforcement in the bill that was passed with no Republican votes.
Are you so fricking stupid that you didn't realize that normal folks wouldn't know that was a lie?...350 BILLION dollars just for law enforcement!
Posted on 6/29/21 at 9:41 am to LSUinMA
quote:
He doesn’t have handlers. That’s a tired narrative. If he had handlers, maybe he wouldn’t say stupid shite like he did the other day about the infrastructure bill.
his handlers help hide these gaffs. otherwise, he would never have been around this long.
quote:
Again, there was $350 billion for law-enforcement in a bill that passed with no Republican votes.
#1- would you like to educate everyone on exactly how this money is to be spent?
#2-if that money is tied to other things that others do not agree with....are they supposed to vote for it no matter what??
THis is why there should ONLY be stand alone bills. the devil is always in the details. the BS is always buried in a 1500 page document, or tied to something to give the dems ammo to fire back at others about.
Posted on 6/29/21 at 12:51 pm to Screaming Viking
quote:
THis is why there should ONLY be stand alone bills.
Not a chance in hell democrats would support a stand alone bill for increased police funding.
Posted on 6/29/21 at 1:28 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
quote:
Chris Wallace
He’s a waste of space
Posted on 6/29/21 at 1:32 pm to LSUinMA
quote:That was money ON TOP of regular funding. That's not "defunding".
There was $350 billion for law-enforcement in the bill that was passed with no Republican votes.
Second it was only part of a huge bill that contained a ton of garbage. Saying "Republicans didn't support police spending" is terribly misleading. Likely they would have supported that one piece in a separate bill. Perhaps the problem is massive pork-filled slush fund of a bill that democrats drafted?
Posted on 6/29/21 at 8:57 pm to Taxing Authority
Massachusetts? I would now state that you are a typical lib and/or troll who extends a thread for a bit but does not answer questions posted to them - in this case a trashy troll with no respect.
Again, stay in MA if you are there already and don't come down, unless you want that arse kicking that you deserve.
Again, stay in MA if you are there already and don't come down, unless you want that arse kicking that you deserve.
Popular
Back to top


0








