Started By
Message

re: Dem Rep Jared Moskowitz calls out MJ. Will you still fund corruption found by DOGE?

Posted on 2/14/25 at 9:11 am to
Posted by chalmetteowl
Chalmette
Member since Jan 2008
54820 posts
Posted on 2/14/25 at 9:11 am to
quote:

a thorn in the side of OMB.


I know it’s Office of Management and Budget but my mind still reads it as Orange Man Bad

But yeah corruption shouldn’t have a party. I’m sure both parties fund shite people don’t really like
Posted by LCA131
Home of the Fake Sig lines
Member since Feb 2008
77241 posts
Posted on 2/14/25 at 9:17 am to
quote:

You can't just shift allocations from one agency to another.



No shite. Oddly, the Federal emergency MA claimed to be out of money in September when Helene came through. But they found a bit of money in December....

Oddly government has never borrowed any social security funds for other projects. But let me guess you have a defense for that also?

Posted by Trauma14
Member since Aug 2010
6555 posts
Posted on 2/14/25 at 9:21 am to
quote:

You can't just shift allocations from one agency to another.



Oh, NOW there are rules. The Biden administration used money allocated in agencies for specific purposes and sent it elsewhere for their own political agenda. How many different agencies were used to fund illegal immigration? DHS, HHS, State, USAID, FEMA?
Posted by offshoretrash
Farmerville, La
Member since Aug 2008
10770 posts
Posted on 2/14/25 at 9:22 am to
Congress should pass a law that each department has to go before their respective committee every quarter and explain each expenditure from their department. This should also be made public information.
Posted by TigerNutwhack
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2004
4247 posts
Posted on 2/14/25 at 9:25 am to
quote:

NIH, this is why it's important to post the actual perspective.


Sorry buddy, I think you're the one who lacks perspective here. You claim to be for spending cuts, but when waste and fraud is found you down play it as a "rounding error". It won't, by itself, solve our budget issues. But you've got to build a baseline of what is actually necessary spending before you can really do that. You want to know how you get people on board with actually balancing the budget, whether through taxes, cuts, or both? You restore trust in the institutions that are utilizing those tax dollars. And to do that, you have to cut as much waste and fraud as possible and make it as loud and transparent as possible.

quote:


Strengthen and modernize our military, making it, without question, the strongest and most powerful in the world



Where does that say no spending cuts? Where does it say they don't want to find waste fraud and abuse within the defense budget?

quote:


Fight for and protect social security and medicare with no cuts, including no changes to the retirement age


Where does that say they don't want to find waste fraud and abuse within SS and Medicare?

Like I said, no one is saying stop at the $40 billion. But like another poster said, we're not going to find a $3 Trillion dollar bill laying around either. We've got to eat this elephant one bite at a time.
Posted by LSUSkip
Central, LA
Member since Jul 2012
24717 posts
Posted on 2/14/25 at 9:27 am to
He shouldn't give them any ideas. Half of the country is completely fine with the government shutting down.
Posted by NIH
Member since Aug 2008
122859 posts
Posted on 2/14/25 at 9:28 am to
Sure, sure. I see you.
Posted by Nosevens
Member since Apr 2019
19307 posts
Posted on 2/14/25 at 9:47 am to
No you read it right, thorn in Orange
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476737 posts
Posted on 2/14/25 at 9:54 am to


We could cut all non-defense spending to $0, cut defense spending in half, and account for the $236B in wasteful spending found (which gives a double bonus as much of this was included in the non-defense spending, so it's counted twice largely, but it also accounts for the Medicare/Medicaid/SS waste) and it would cut 1.5T or so in spending.

We're still $200B in the hole, and that's not including the debt expansion due to interest rates rising.
Posted by NIH
Member since Aug 2008
122859 posts
Posted on 2/14/25 at 1:34 pm to
None of that excuses $40b in fraud
Posted by RohanGonzales
Pronoun: Whatever
Member since Apr 2024
10674 posts
Posted on 2/14/25 at 1:36 pm to
nice static analysis dipshit
Posted by djsdawg
Member since Apr 2015
41740 posts
Posted on 2/14/25 at 1:42 pm to
quote:

It's educated people who are political neophytes a bit, but "corruption" hasn't been found yet.


Is this because of plausible deniability?
Posted by Stonehenge
Wakulla Springs
Member since Dec 2014
2679 posts
Posted on 2/14/25 at 1:45 pm to
The purpose DOGE is to free up funds for Musk’s tax breaks and contracts. The little people are sacrificed so the wealthiest man can get richer. Making America Gullible Always
Posted by SoFla Tideroller
South Florida
Member since Apr 2010
41007 posts
Posted on 2/14/25 at 1:46 pm to
quote:

My position is to desire a decrease in spending via Congressional action.


No shite. That's all of our desires. I've already fired off a few red rocket emails to my congressman. Hold these worthless turds' feet to the fire*.







*In my congressman's case, Brian Mast, this doesn't apply.
This post was edited on 2/14/25 at 2:51 pm
Posted by Azkiger
Member since Nov 2016
28141 posts
Posted on 2/14/25 at 1:47 pm to
quote:

When the trial happens and an order is issued, we can answer that question


"We need to wait for a biologist to determine whether that person is a man or a woman."

Nah, I have at least two brain cells to rub together so I'm fine figuring this one out myself.

Face it, either you accept that it's lawfare (virtue signaling to the progressive base) or your original take on the matter is incorrect because DOGE is doing more than just virtue signaling.
Posted by NIH
Member since Aug 2008
122859 posts
Posted on 2/14/25 at 1:48 pm to
You’re a white male liberal ?
Posted by Azkiger
Member since Nov 2016
28141 posts
Posted on 2/14/25 at 1:50 pm to
Just an example dumbass. Point is the money is going somewhere where it shouldn't be. Why not put that money where it's actually useful to the American people?

"It's only tens of billions of dollars, what good will that do?"
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
140573 posts
Posted on 2/14/25 at 1:52 pm to
quote:

None of that excuses $40b in fraud


I bet when a $400 Billion dollar congressional spending cut occurs, it would be lauded by SFP but finding $40 billion dollars a year in WF&A is a nothingburger, not realizing they are exactly the same thing.
Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
70694 posts
Posted on 2/14/25 at 1:56 pm to
Bruh, you seriously need help
Posted by djsdawg
Member since Apr 2015
41740 posts
Posted on 2/14/25 at 1:57 pm to
quote:

My position is to desire a decrease in spending via Congressional action.


And if this doesn’t happen? Oh well, do nothing, Just go down with the ship?
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram