- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: David French Sunday Email : Re: HRC vs Trump mishandling classified information—-good read
Posted on 8/14/22 at 10:06 am to Jjdoc
Posted on 8/14/22 at 10:06 am to Jjdoc
The Atlantic is one of the biggest POS "publications" of this generation. Everyone who works there should be turned into speedbumps.
Posted on 8/14/22 at 10:10 am to 850SaintsGator
I read and noticed a lot of "ifs" and wishfulness wrapped up in some of the usual mindreading attempts.. along with excuse making...or "why it's different for President Trump."
Great example of cognitive dissonance.
Great example of cognitive dissonance.
Posted on 8/14/22 at 10:10 am to 850SaintsGator
quote:
brainwashed pattern
Typical liberal projection.
Posted on 8/14/22 at 10:12 am to thebigmuffaletta
quote:
Your accusation of everyone else being brainwashed is a defense mechanism to keep from having your beliefs challenged.
So funny point - my career is policy - my beliefs are challenged all the time. I have changed tons of my beliefs when faced to a more succinct logical argument.
Posted on 8/14/22 at 10:13 am to 850SaintsGator
quote:
So funny point - my career is policy - my beliefs are challenged all the time. I have changed tons of my beliefs when faced to a more succinct logical argument.
All evidence to the contrary.
Posted on 8/14/22 at 10:18 am to 850SaintsGator
quote:
my career is policy
I see you parrot this a lot in threads. Do you think this somehow gives you credibility? People who make it their career to engage in policy are some of the most rigid and biased people out there.
Posted on 8/14/22 at 10:20 am to Liberator
quote:
Liberator
quote:
HUH?? How much "openness" and credibility should be given to condescending anti-MAGA types? Especially at this point in time after the coup, "Russia-Russia!" and non-stop litany of bullsh*t?
Ok/ admittedly i shouldn’t have lead with that- that speaks to my past interaction when i posted a thread on French’s email on Uvalde gun violence” a very non never trump email but a good bit of posters came blasting French for his never trump stance …it was projecting a bit and unfair to some one here
quote:
Well, how mighty white of him.
What does this mean? It seems different but I’ll let you explain to me…i don’t want to assume
quote:
David French can get bent. Along with his his red herring horsecrap "fairness" narrative and blaming a looong rigged, corrupt "System" of LE and justice.
Sooo maybe i was on to something about MAGA types
Posted on 8/14/22 at 10:21 am to Tchefuncte Tiger
quote:
who has Constitutional authority. . .not Hillary
And that one difference completely destroys the OP talking points.
Posted on 8/14/22 at 10:28 am to 850SaintsGator
quote:
Sooo maybe i was on to something about MAGA types
Those MAGA types seem to be correct about you.
Posted on 8/14/22 at 10:35 am to 850SaintsGator
quote:The only time you were on to something about a MAGA type was when it was your turn to man the glory hole.
Sooo maybe i was on to something about MAGA types
Posted on 8/14/22 at 10:41 am to upgrayedd
quote:
It's been hilarious to watch the left embrace Mitt Romney, John McCain, Liz Cheney, Bill Kristol, Max Boot, John Bolton, and David French after calling them warmongers/war criminals and literally Hitler for decades ?
It's a calling by a higher power to them.
"Anti Trump forces unite!"
It reminds me of Saturday morning justice league cartoons.
Posted on 8/14/22 at 10:52 am to 850SaintsGator
quote:
If Trump
So that's where we are at with main stream news.
I'd add "if my aunt had balls...", but the main stream news says that is now true.
It's obvious to anyone with a brian the Swamp has a very deep fear of DJT and what could happen with the American people waking up to their crooked ways.
And that type of woke is very dangerous to the swamp creatures.
Posted on 8/14/22 at 10:52 am to Liberator
open minded to the left is full acceptance of what their position is, other wise you are closed minded.
Posted on 8/14/22 at 11:00 am to themunch
quote:
open minded to the left is full acceptance of what their position is, other wise you are closed minded.
Exactly
And "starting/having a conversation" means "you'll sit there quietly and listen to me lecture you"
This post was edited on 8/14/22 at 11:03 am
Posted on 8/14/22 at 11:15 am to 850SaintsGator
quote:
I fully understand that most MAGA types aren’t open minded enough to read opinions from people who don’t like Trump but this morning’s email was on point.
Right, because marxist democrats have demonstrated how open minded and tolerant they are, huh? I do appreciate you letting everyone know in the first sentence that we can ignore the rest of the post.
Posted on 8/14/22 at 11:20 am to 850SaintsGator
quote:no, it is because of who you are.
quote:
I quit reading when I saw it was you who posted it fwiw
Then the first sentence directly applied to you and I was spot on!
Thanks for confirming:-)
This is NOT YOUR OPINION. It is probably leftist propaganda.
Lots of people are ready to ostracize and stigmatize people like yourself. It absolutely should happen
No opinion of your own and unquestioning loyalty to the stupidity of leftism. Yeah, NO.
Posted on 8/14/22 at 11:21 am to upgrayedd
Since you (OP) work in policy and have had experience listening to reason and changing your position please explain these facts:
- The writers works of left leaning organizations and constantly harps on anti-right stumps. Why would would someone with such a well documented inability to be unbiased be something anyone should listen to as gospel?
- Secondly, as posted earlier by numerous individuals there is a HUGE difference between the declas authority of a POTUS and Sec of State. In fact SCOTUS has adjudicated this fact and gone so far to say a POTUS can not be charged with Espionage. Why would the writer stretch and tie the two points together and why wouldn’t he disprove this charge in his article?
- Obstruction is not cooperating with Legal Authority. It was clearly documented the HRC did not cooperate and the FBI treated her with kid gloves. In Trump’s case he allowed agents into Mar Lago, met with them, took their advice and had an open line of communication. That being the case why would they have to do an early morning raid that Garland said was narrow in scope (just covering all work product during his 4 year Presidential term…………..real narrow) with +30 agents and not allow legal counsel a chance to observe when HRC was not treated this way?
- Lastly, what is easier to breach: a private unsecured server or a physical documents, under lock and key, guarded by Secret Service agents and additional private security personnel?
Basically if you are really able to be swayed everyone of these points show a complete bias in the writers opinions and the actions of the FBI/DoJ.
- The writers works of left leaning organizations and constantly harps on anti-right stumps. Why would would someone with such a well documented inability to be unbiased be something anyone should listen to as gospel?
- Secondly, as posted earlier by numerous individuals there is a HUGE difference between the declas authority of a POTUS and Sec of State. In fact SCOTUS has adjudicated this fact and gone so far to say a POTUS can not be charged with Espionage. Why would the writer stretch and tie the two points together and why wouldn’t he disprove this charge in his article?
- Obstruction is not cooperating with Legal Authority. It was clearly documented the HRC did not cooperate and the FBI treated her with kid gloves. In Trump’s case he allowed agents into Mar Lago, met with them, took their advice and had an open line of communication. That being the case why would they have to do an early morning raid that Garland said was narrow in scope (just covering all work product during his 4 year Presidential term…………..real narrow) with +30 agents and not allow legal counsel a chance to observe when HRC was not treated this way?
- Lastly, what is easier to breach: a private unsecured server or a physical documents, under lock and key, guarded by Secret Service agents and additional private security personnel?
Basically if you are really able to be swayed everyone of these points show a complete bias in the writers opinions and the actions of the FBI/DoJ.
Posted on 8/14/22 at 11:27 am to themunch
quote:
open minded to the left is full acceptance of what their position is, other wise you are closed minded.
Which is what 850 is all about!
Posted on 8/14/22 at 11:30 am to ABearsFanNMS
quote:
Since you (OP) work in policy and have had experience listening to reason and changing your position please explain these facts:
- The writers works of left leaning organizations and constantly harps on anti-right stumps. Why would would someone with such a well documented inability to be unbiased be something anyone should listen to as gospel?
First time to ever post the word "BOOM" here.
BOOM!
quote:
- Secondly, as posted earlier by numerous individuals there is a HUGE difference between the declas authority of a POTUS and Sec of State. In fact SCOTUS has adjudicated this fact and gone so far to say a POTUS can not be charged with Espionage. Why would the writer stretch and tie the two points together and why wouldn’t he disprove this charge in his article?
The article is a hit piece towards a man that the WRITER HATES!
quote:
Basically if you are really able to be swayed everyone of these points show a complete bias in the writers opinions and the actions of the FBI/DoJ.
...well... there you go!
Posted on 8/14/22 at 11:31 am to 850SaintsGator
quote:
Indeed the entire issue may be so fraught with peril that the DOJ may decide to merely seize the documents without any further legal proceedings.
Lol
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News