- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
CR with SAVE Act fails in House
Posted on 9/18/24 at 7:47 pm
Posted on 9/18/24 at 7:47 pm
Which means some turncoat Republicans voted against it.
17
Posted on 9/18/24 at 7:48 pm to udtiger
14 to be exact. I want to know who they are and why they voted no.
Posted on 9/18/24 at 7:50 pm to udtiger
We are so weak.....it is sickening.
Citizenship = vote privilege
What is so hard with this concept?
Citizenship = vote privilege
What is so hard with this concept?
Posted on 9/18/24 at 7:50 pm to PJinAtl
Bought and paid for.
Posted on 9/18/24 at 7:52 pm to PJinAtl
Here you go:
LINK
Jim Banks, Indiana
Andy Biggs, Alabama
Lauren Boebert, Colorado
Tim Burchett, Tennessee
Elijah Crane, Arizona
Matt Gaetz, Florida
Wesley Hunt, Texas
Doug Lamborn, Colorado
Nancy Mace, South Carolina
Cory Mills, Florida
Mike Rogers, Alabama
Matt Rosendale, Montana
W. Gregory Steube, Florida
Beth Van Duyne, Texas
Many voted against it because other than SAVE it was 100% funding and SAVE would be removed in the Senate
LINK
Jim Banks, Indiana
Andy Biggs, Alabama
Lauren Boebert, Colorado
Tim Burchett, Tennessee
Elijah Crane, Arizona
Matt Gaetz, Florida
Wesley Hunt, Texas
Doug Lamborn, Colorado
Nancy Mace, South Carolina
Cory Mills, Florida
Mike Rogers, Alabama
Matt Rosendale, Montana
W. Gregory Steube, Florida
Beth Van Duyne, Texas
Many voted against it because other than SAVE it was 100% funding and SAVE would be removed in the Senate
This post was edited on 9/18/24 at 7:54 pm
Posted on 9/18/24 at 7:53 pm to udtiger
Yeah I was gonna add, read it. It’s another stupid funding bill
Posted on 9/18/24 at 7:55 pm to udtiger
When the entire freedom caucus is voting against something it probably sucks.
Posted on 9/18/24 at 7:56 pm to udtiger
Thomas Massie for one
Posted on 9/18/24 at 7:57 pm to tide06
Isn't Cory Mills that sniper guy?
Posted on 9/18/24 at 7:57 pm to udtiger
Me personally, I say vote no on ANY continuing resolution/omnibus.
Make Biden, or Harris, submit a budget request and vote on a budget.
They get away with so much bullshite after conditioning us to accept these CR's versus the dreaded "shutdown".
frick that, shut it down. Debt, inflation, etc. Make every dept. fight for every dollar. And DOJ/FBI/DHS gets nothing till 2025 so they can't continue to act as a Dem party extension until after the election.
Make Biden, or Harris, submit a budget request and vote on a budget.
They get away with so much bullshite after conditioning us to accept these CR's versus the dreaded "shutdown".
frick that, shut it down. Debt, inflation, etc. Make every dept. fight for every dollar. And DOJ/FBI/DHS gets nothing till 2025 so they can't continue to act as a Dem party extension until after the election.
Posted on 9/18/24 at 7:57 pm to udtiger
More like party leadership sucking again. I’m not impressed, dishonorable Mike Johnson.
Posted on 9/18/24 at 7:58 pm to udtiger
quote:
Here you go:
There’s some solid people on that list. Clowns as well.
quote:
Your bill does NOT responsibly fund government," Massie wrote to X, formerly Twitter, in response to a post from Johnson. "It's 12 bills rolled into one bill that continues the profligate spending that's ruining our country. The fact that you've added a 13th bill to it does not make it a serious solution. Please quit insulting our constituents."
Not that Massie is the end all, be all but I usually appreciate his takes.
This post was edited on 9/18/24 at 8:01 pm
Posted on 9/18/24 at 7:58 pm to udtiger
quote:
Which means some turncoat Republicans voted against it.
Those 14 should be marked for primary challenges.
Posted on 9/18/24 at 7:59 pm to PJinAtl
quote:
14 to be exact. I want to know who they are and why they voted no.
Massie pointed out last week that limp-dicked, neocon POS Mike Johnson already pre-negotiated the Republican surrender. They would pass it, then the SAVE piece would be removed, Republicans would put up a fake WWE style fight to then give up. Government funded. No SAVE. It was never going to really happen. Those 14 did the right thing. frick the neo-con scum we can't stop voting in
Posted on 9/18/24 at 7:59 pm to 3nOut
I am all for a shutdown.
House should vote for CR with 10% across the board cut and SAVE Act.
House should vote for CR with 10% across the board cut and SAVE Act.
Posted on 9/18/24 at 8:03 pm to udtiger
quote:
Many voted against it because other than SAVE it was 100% funding and SAVE would be removed in the Senate
Nice.
Everyone in here
Posted on 9/18/24 at 8:04 pm to FreddieMac
I don’t think you’re understanding what’s going on here
Posted on 9/18/24 at 8:06 pm to lsuguy84
quote:
I don’t think you’re understanding what’s going on here
Please tell us i damn sure dont know whats going on
Posted on 9/18/24 at 8:07 pm to udtiger
Lot of Republicans, especially Freedom Caucus types are a NO because they are not going along with the fake fight from Johnson.
Some tweet quotes from Andy Biggs:
This bill continues to fully fund the radical Biden-Harris regime's woke priorities and fails to secure conservative policy riders.
There are viable alternatives to yet another CR.
MTG tweet:
Tonight, I voted present on the CR + SAVE Act because I refuse to participate in a lie and Johnson’s fake fight with the Senate.
I’ve never voted for a CR and I already voted to pass the SAVE Act in July.
Especially, when rumor has it, Mike Johnson has already negotiated surrender and cut a deal.
The American people deserve better.
Sep 18, 2024, 06:44 PM | 118th Congress, 2nd Session
Vote Question: On Passage
Continuing Appropriations and Other Matters Act, 2025
Vote Type: Yea-And-Nay
Status: Failed
VOTES
yea: 202
nay: 220
present: 2
not voting: 7
Pretty much Dems voted NO and Republicans voted YES with some exceptions.
Voting present were Massie and MTG
Republicans that voted NO were:
Banks
Biggs
Boebert
Burchett
Crane
Gaetz
Hunt
Lamborn
Mace
Mills
Rogers
Rosendale
Steuben
Van Duyne
Some tweet quotes from Andy Biggs:
This bill continues to fully fund the radical Biden-Harris regime's woke priorities and fails to secure conservative policy riders.
There are viable alternatives to yet another CR.
MTG tweet:
Tonight, I voted present on the CR + SAVE Act because I refuse to participate in a lie and Johnson’s fake fight with the Senate.
I’ve never voted for a CR and I already voted to pass the SAVE Act in July.
Especially, when rumor has it, Mike Johnson has already negotiated surrender and cut a deal.
The American people deserve better.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. Sep 18, 2024, 06:44 PM | 118th Congress, 2nd Session
Vote Question: On Passage
Continuing Appropriations and Other Matters Act, 2025
Vote Type: Yea-And-Nay
Status: Failed
VOTES
yea: 202
nay: 220
present: 2
not voting: 7
Pretty much Dems voted NO and Republicans voted YES with some exceptions.
Voting present were Massie and MTG
Republicans that voted NO were:
Banks
Biggs
Boebert
Burchett
Crane
Gaetz
Hunt
Lamborn
Mace
Mills
Rogers
Rosendale
Steuben
Van Duyne
Posted on 9/18/24 at 8:09 pm to udtiger
quote:
CR with SAVE Act fails in House
Who gives a shite? It was DOA in the Senate.
Show votes are stupid.
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News