Started By
Message

re: Congress is officially castrated now when it comes to war

Posted on 3/5/26 at 5:30 am to
Posted by Good Times
Hill top in Tn
Member since Nov 2007
24856 posts
Posted on 3/5/26 at 5:30 am to
quote:

It takes a moral idiot, with logical deprivation included, to not support a surgical strike that takes out the most dangerous group of death-cult inbreds the world has ever seen - especially when their entire reason for existence is to produce an earth-ending holocaust so they can have their x-virgins in 'heaven'


The ploy is to mimimize the realities of the intent and potential threats. Just because it has taken 47 years to get to this place, many accept that as a permanent status. By not accepting the potential for Iran to bring their stated goal of “DEATH TO AMERICA, THE GREAT SATAN”, the left can muddy the water of analysis.

The offer of “lifetime” supply of energy grade nuclear material was rejected. Thus, PROVING, Iran’s intent. Islam’s Taqiyya, basically lying to protect their real objectives, seems to work on some who want to believe.


Just as illegal migrants are now viewed as worthy of sympathy and support, rather than lawbreakers, many want to resist the application of our laws. The shell game started when this administration stated the intent to deport the “ worst of the worst”. Duh, seems obvious based on the safety of American citizens. But, enforce the rule of law, please.
This post was edited on 3/5/26 at 7:29 am
Posted by RohanGonzales
Pronoun: Whatever
Member since Apr 2024
10591 posts
Posted on 3/5/26 at 5:41 am to
quote:

Rankest


World War II is the last war declared by Congress. What rock have you been living under?
Posted by Diamondawg
Mississippi
Member since Oct 2006
38341 posts
Posted on 3/5/26 at 5:47 am to
quote:

Congress is officially castrated now when it comes to war
Korea, Vietnam, Desert Storm, Afghanistan, Iraq just to name a few.
Posted by i am dan
NC
Member since Aug 2011
31646 posts
Posted on 3/5/26 at 5:48 am to
quote:

 a nation bombed Mar a Lago and buried Trump beneath the rubble the Gravy Seals would damn sure be calling it an act of war.

Did Trump murder 30,000 civilian protestors?
Posted by i am dan
NC
Member since Aug 2011
31646 posts
Posted on 3/5/26 at 5:50 am to
Obama dropped over 26,000 bombs in one year...
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
55439 posts
Posted on 3/5/26 at 6:24 am to
quote:

Why do you people keep saying we are at war?

Because we are at war with Iran.

Congress has the power to stop it, but they chose not to. I don’t see how this “castrates” congress. And nothing has changed since the War Powers Act passed. The President has always had the constitutional power to start wars. The WRA put some guiderails around it; the president must inform congress within two days, and he must cease operations within 60 days if congress does not approve. Everything is being done by the book. I don’t see cause for the OP to whine.
Posted by Willie Stroker
Member since Sep 2008
16612 posts
Posted on 3/5/26 at 6:30 am to
quote:

Unconstitutional wars initiated by executive decree is the new norm.

The Supreme Court has refused to call the War Powers Act unconstitutional for decades.

It’s not unconstitutional.
Posted by Willie Stroker
Member since Sep 2008
16612 posts
Posted on 3/5/26 at 6:34 am to
quote:

Why is this board so afraid to say the word war?

What do you think the authors of the constitution meant when they called it war?

And what distinction do you think they were making when they changed the phrasing from “make war” to “declare war”?
Posted by lake chuck fan
Vinton
Member since Aug 2011
23717 posts
Posted on 3/5/26 at 6:36 am to
quote:

Unconstitutional wars initiated by executive decree is the new norm.

Get used to it.

The constitution is limp bone hanging out of the trunk these days


Ignorance is a terrible thing.... your concerns are noted, but see below.
Also, notifying ALL of Congress would ensure the information is leaked which would put troops in a huge disadvantage.


quote:



The law you're referring to is the War Powers Resolution (also commonly called the War Powers Act), passed in 1973 over President Richard Nixon's veto.This federal law (codified at 50 U.S.C. §§ 1541–1548) was enacted in response to the Vietnam War to reassert Congress's constitutional role in committing U.S. forces to armed conflict, while acknowledging the president's authority as Commander-in-Chief.Key provisions include:The president must consult with Congress "in every possible instance" before introducing U.S. Armed Forces into hostilities or situations where imminent involvement in hostilities is indicated.
The president must notify Congress in writing within 48 hours of introducing U.S. forces into hostilities (or situations with imminent hostilities) without a prior declaration of war or specific statutory authorization.
The use of U.S. forces in such situations must end within 60 days after the notification (or when it was required) unless Congress:Declares war,
Enacts specific statutory authorization (e.g., an Authorization for Use of Military Force or AUMF),
Extends the period by law, or
Is unable to meet due to an attack on the U.S.

The president can extend this by up to an additional 30 days (for a total of 90 days) if they certify in writing that unavoidable military necessity requires it for safe withdrawal.


This post was edited on 3/5/26 at 6:38 am
Posted by BOHICAMAN
Member since Feb 2026
1159 posts
Posted on 3/5/26 at 6:38 am to
quote:

What do you think the authors of the constitution meant when they called it war?


Probably the same thing every other sane person means when they say the word “war.”

quote:

And what distinction do you think they were making when they changed the phrasing from “make war” to “declare war”?

I don’t know. Maybe they wanted the people to have a say in who went to war with. The people have voted to give that power to POTUS.

Will you answer my question now?
Posted by RCDfan1950
United States
Member since Feb 2007
39638 posts
Posted on 3/5/26 at 6:41 am to
“ And what distinction do you think they were making when they changed the phrasing from “make war” to “declare war”?(Quote WS).

The same distinction Pontious Pilate made when he washed his hands and let the Jewish Rulers whack Jesus. Plausible deniability if it all goes bad.
Posted by thejuiceisloose
Member since Nov 2018
6378 posts
Posted on 3/5/26 at 6:53 am to
quote:

Why is this board so afraid to say the word war?


Because the majority of this board has no concrete principals besides worshiping their orange idol
Posted by LSUbest
Coastal Plain
Member since Aug 2007
16369 posts
Posted on 3/5/26 at 6:55 am to
STFU bitch!
Posted by Arkaea79
Member since Sep 2022
1090 posts
Posted on 3/5/26 at 6:58 am to
Thanks for showing us how retarded you are. Also, it's constitutional as it has been for the past... forever. You act like this is a 'new thing' that was done. It's not. You're just naive or intentionally stupid.
Posted by Knight of Old
New Hampshire
Member since Jul 2007
13051 posts
Posted on 3/5/26 at 6:59 am to
Please name and quote the Supreme Court case(s)…
Posted by Flats
Member since Jul 2019
28080 posts
Posted on 3/5/26 at 6:59 am to
quote:

Why is this board so afraid to say the word war?


Posted by Squirrelmeister
Member since Nov 2021
3685 posts
Posted on 3/5/26 at 7:00 am to
quote:

The constitution is limp bone hanging out of the trunk these days.

If I build a suppressor without first paying $0 and getting a tax receipt for $0 after, they’ll throw me in federal prison for 10 years for not getting a receipt that says I payed zero dollars.

You think Trump or anyone in congress or the Supreme Court gives two fricks about the constitution???
Posted by P0SEIDON
Member since Apr 2014
356 posts
Posted on 3/5/26 at 7:00 am to
quote:

new


Lol. You poor lamb.
Posted by geauxbrown
Louisiana
Member since Oct 2006
27230 posts
Posted on 3/5/26 at 7:05 am to
Meh, if we were attacked resulting in a large enough loss of American lives, even a majority of Dems would vote for it.

Until then, carry on with these limited military actions that rely heavily on air strikes versus wholesale boots on the ground.
Posted by Alltheway Tigers!
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2004
8017 posts
Posted on 3/5/26 at 7:06 am to
quote:

Unconstitutional wars initiated by executive decree is the new norm.


The “new” norm? Where have you been the past 50 years.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram