- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: CNN Sources Indicate Iran Airstrike Not As Successful As Originally Thought
Posted on 6/24/25 at 5:01 pm to Iowa Golfer
Posted on 6/24/25 at 5:01 pm to Iowa Golfer
This is my issue with involvement. They will spin it to get more and try to encumber the admin in this conflict. I don’t believe the Media or the CIA.
This post was edited on 6/24/25 at 5:33 pm
0
Posted on 6/24/25 at 5:01 pm to Iowa Golfer
All these people do is lie so when you say CNN reporting no one takes it seriously.
Every story they say- Verified by anonymous sources Riiiiiiight
Every story they say- Verified by anonymous sources Riiiiiiight
Posted on 6/24/25 at 5:11 pm to Wildcat1996
quote:yes
Is it really so important that Trump fail that you need the military to fail as well?
Posted on 6/24/25 at 5:16 pm to cajuntiger1010
quote:her Twitter is hilarious.
Natasha Bertrand is reporting this
First she reports it. Then:
quote:
NYT confirms CNN:
quote:
AP has confirmed CNN.
quote:
The Post has confirmed CNN.
A circle jerk of leftist media "confirming" each others creampies
Posted on 6/24/25 at 5:33 pm to Iowa Golfer
Lemme guess… a “mostly peaceful” air strike?
frick you, CNN!
,,!,,
frick you, CNN!
,,!,,
Posted on 6/24/25 at 5:35 pm to Klark Kent
quote:
ABC running with it as fact at this point.
CNN and ABC confirming stories for each other. What could go wrong?
Posted on 6/24/25 at 5:36 pm to Iowa Golfer
They’re only saying it to make Trump look bad. Everyone knows that
Posted on 6/24/25 at 5:38 pm to Klark Kent
quote:
ABC running with it as fact at this point. I just watched their segment, “set Iran’s nuclear program back a few months at best.”
I thought they said they didn’t have one
Posted on 6/24/25 at 5:39 pm to hogwildinhouston
quote:
I hate to say it, but Trump should absolutely bomb the shite out of Iran tonight, and say it's due to ABC saying the bombings the other night didn't work.
FWIW, I would gladly say that.
Posted on 6/24/25 at 5:41 pm to SirWinston
quote:
after a record low one post in two days
Woah
Posted on 6/24/25 at 5:41 pm to Iowa Golfer
These ppl are mentally ill
Posted on 6/24/25 at 5:42 pm to Klark Kent
Yet Iran asked for a ceasefire and diplomacy....wierd huh?
Posted on 6/24/25 at 5:42 pm to Statestreet
quote:this is where SFP akctuallys a "i was just talking about their nuclear program " and disappears if you ask him to go on the record that Iran was not pursuing nukes. True story
thought they said they didn’t have one
Posted on 6/24/25 at 5:44 pm to Iowa Golfer
the Defense Intelligence Agency put out the report not cnn.
Posted on 6/24/25 at 5:48 pm to Iowa Golfer
quote:
CNN Sources Indicate Iran Airstrike Not As Successful As Originally Thought
This is playing right into what I said earlier:
quote:
quote:
What do you think would happen if Iran successfully tested a Nuc next week had the US not intervened here? Do you think the region would be more stable with the ayatollah sitting on nuclear weapons?
that is a conveniently generic justification to go to war with anyone.
I mean we need to act now, because "what if".
If "what if" happens, we should have acted sooner.
So we should bomb sovereign nations because "what if"
quote:quote:
Your supposed scenario seems to be one of the weirdest notions of 7 dimensional chess I've seen here.
inventing a sort of cassus belli that makes any aggression you take on another nation is 7-D chess?
We do it all the time. What do you think the War on Terror or the War on Drugs did for the Deep State?
It isn't extradimensional chess. It is a tale as old as the CIA.
"Dey got nukes" is going to be the new "muh terrorism"
This post was edited on 6/24/25 at 5:54 pm
Posted on 6/24/25 at 5:49 pm to FightinTigersDammit
CNN is merely reporting an analysis made by DOD intelligence.its not claiming it made any analysis, but I think you know that.
It was always possible, even likely, that an air strike alone wouldn’t terminate the Iran nuclear program…
It was always possible, even likely, that an air strike alone wouldn’t terminate the Iran nuclear program…
Posted on 6/24/25 at 5:49 pm to Klark Kent
quote:
ABC running with it as fact at this point.
I just watched their segment, “set Iran’s nuclear program back a few months at best.”
Well according to this same media, "Iran is just a few months away from having a nuclear warhead" since the GWB administration.
So, by those metrics, that bought us at very least another 25 years.
Posted on 6/24/25 at 5:51 pm to HeadCall
quote:Correct.
They’re only saying it to make Trump look bad. Everyone knows that
Worst case scenario, it costs us as much to set back the Iranian Nuke program (even on a continuing Q3/m bombing basis) as it does the Iranians to restore it. The pain, even assuming that BS hypo for Iran, is 75x relatively that of the US.
CNN Sources Indicate CNN is a group of imbeciles.
Posted on 6/24/25 at 5:57 pm to TigerAxeOK
FACTS
Posted on 6/24/25 at 5:58 pm to VOR
quote:
even likely, that an air strike alone wouldn’t terminate the Iran nuclear program…
Yet, wipe the Jews off the planet and Death to America came to a screeching fricking halt?
Within 48 hrs? Ceasefire? We’re going to fire bottle rockets at your base, we’re telling you that 12 hours in advance, but please let us walk out of this without completely destroying us.
Whatever hole you live, go back in it, you fricking Hobbit.
Page 3 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News