re: Citizen Vigilante II, is this the filmmaker?

I’ve seen it on X . Not exceptionally well made but it has its moments. And a sobering very real world message.

quote:

---

A few of his movies: House of the Dead: 3% on RT Bloodrayne: 4% on RT In the Name of the King: 4% on RT Bloodrayne 2: 0% on RT Postal: 9% on RT Here is a quote from a review of ITNOTK: "Featuring mostly wooden performances, laughable dialogue, and shoddy production values, In the Name of the King fulfills all expectations of an Uwe Boll film." It's not just reviews. His movies lose unfathomable amounts of money. Far Cry Budget $30 million Box office $743,634 Bloodrayne: Budget $25 million[2] Box office $3.7 million In the Name of the King: Budget $60 million[1] Box office $13.1 million

---

This is fine and dandy and good to know.

The overriding point isn’t whether this guy is Scorsese but whether the theme this particular film is built upon has struck a nerve, which it obviously has done.

Watched it last weekend. Enjoyed it far more than that horrific left wing grift communist version of the Wizard of Oz.

quote:

---

But not this movie.

You did some copy and paste as usual to deflect from the issues addressed in the film.

---

You say this in a thread titled

quote:

---

is this the filmmaker?

---

Some of the effects look like they were added using basic movie making editing software, but the messaging of the film supersedes that aspect.

quote:

---

hand-picked online critics

---

You mean those who agreed to do it?

Ok. And?

quote:

---

was never avenged

---

Didn't he take out the judge over one their cases?

Yeah the whole thing feels cheap and fast. But the fact that they actually took on this topic is why it's drawing views. We've been denied the ability to discuss this subject for a long arse time.

I enjoyed it. He was a psychopath, and the fortress room was stupid, and I still don't know what that sex scene was about, but in spite of it all, it's going to start with a psychopath that's sorted out all the excuses in his head and is on the warpath. Then there will be more. And more.

And more.

quote:

---

A few of his movies:

House of the Dead: 3% on RT
Bloodrayne: 4% on RT
In the Name of the King: 4% on RT
Bloodrayne 2: 0% on RT
Postal: 9% on RT

Here is a quote from a review of ITNOTK: "Featuring mostly wooden performances, laughable dialogue, and shoddy production values, In the Name of the King fulfills all expectations of an Uwe Boll film."

It's not just reviews. His movies lose unfathomable amounts of money.

Far Cry
Budget $30 million
Box office $743,634

Bloodrayne:
Budget $25 million[2]
Box office $3.7 million

In the Name of the King:
Budget $60 million[1]
Box office $13.1 million

---

Take another hit of Copium, He's No.1 on Amazon with this one

When the legal standards and application for Law are abandoned for the cause of DEI, and massive numbers of immigrants whose cultural, moral and violence standards are well below that of the civilized indigenous population, then an abandonment of the government which abandons the citizens is inevitable.

This is akin to an “emperor has no clothes “ scenario as even the dumbest in the crowd can shout the obvious truth and be hailed by the citizens as a true leader. In fact, only a fool would dare speak truth to a tyrannical power in such a scenario. The more that the ‘Government’ tries to silence the citizens, the more evil they both will become in employment of the violent means required to win.

It does not matter how crude the artistic ‘message’, only the power of truth in the message. The well-known Painting of “The Scream” is a perfect example of sometimes unpolished is more powerful than a refined version toward advance artistic narrative.

It’s coming.