Started By
Message

re: Citizen Vigilante II, is this the filmmaker?

Posted on 6/29/26 at 9:33 pm to
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
130912 posts
Posted on 6/29/26 at 9:33 pm to
quote:

I had never heard of him but now I want to watch more!


You really really do not.

If you haven’t heard of him you must not be really into film because he is very famous for making the biggest dogshit you can imagine.

And it’s not because it’s “right wing”. This is his only one of those. His films are mostly meant NOT to make money.
Posted by Timeoday
Easter Island
Member since Aug 2020
24086 posts
Posted on 6/29/26 at 9:33 pm to
quote:

And at the end of the day, there seemed very little actual retribution and vengeance going on.


I saw more retribution and vengeance in Citizen Vigilante than I have ever seen in any movie.
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
130912 posts
Posted on 6/29/26 at 9:34 pm to
quote:

Anything about Hunter Biden’s “art”?


What about it?

Most art like that now seems to be money laundering and tax scams
Posted by Timeoday
Easter Island
Member since Aug 2020
24086 posts
Posted on 6/29/26 at 9:36 pm to
quote:

Anything about Hunter Biden’s “art”?


Maybe Boll takes us down that path of subliminal criminality espoused by Hunter the pedo.
Posted by Robin Masters
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2010
36532 posts
Posted on 6/29/26 at 9:39 pm to
quote:

If you haven’t heard of him you must not be really into film


I’m definitely not into film although I appreciate good art and I have a decent sense of what quality looks and sounds like.

This film was “not it” as my 14 yo would say.
Posted by Robin Masters
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2010
36532 posts
Posted on 6/29/26 at 9:42 pm to
quote:

saw more retribution and vengeance in Citizen Vigilante than I have ever seen in any movie.


The lady from opening scenes was never avenged nor was the dark haired lady in the hospital. Two major loose ends.

But, I’ll say again, I’m thrilled it was made and I hope it becomes the biggest movie of the year.
This post was edited on 6/29/26 at 9:43 pm
Posted by Bjorn Cyborg
Member since Sep 2016
36088 posts
Posted on 6/29/26 at 9:48 pm to
The best thing that ever happened to him was the movie getting banned. You can’t buy that type of publicity.

I enjoyed the movie, but it was kind of a mess.

The sex scene was out of place and they showed some scenes of him in some sort of interrogation, but never went back to it or explained it
Posted by Timeoday
Easter Island
Member since Aug 2020
24086 posts
Posted on 6/29/26 at 9:48 pm to
quote:

The lady from opening scenes was never avenged nor was the dark haired lady in the hospital. Two major loose ends.


Citizen Vigilante II will provide such vengeance. For me, that lady with her son in the opening scene took me right to the young lady last year who had her throat slashed on the transit system.

In other words, we have it here already.
Posted by Robin Masters
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2010
36532 posts
Posted on 6/29/26 at 9:50 pm to
quote:

The best thing that ever happened to him was the movie getting banned. You can’t buy that type of publicity.


Streisand effect.

Posted by Robin Masters
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2010
36532 posts
Posted on 6/29/26 at 9:54 pm to
quote:

itizen Vigilante II will provide such vengeance. For me, that lady with her son in the opening scene took me right to the young lady last year who had her throat slashed on the transit system. In other words, we have it here already.


Let’s hope.

Yes, the crimes against innocent people were very believable. That was not an issue with the film.
Posted by BeepBopBoop
Northshore
Member since Dec 2023
1508 posts
Posted on 6/29/26 at 9:59 pm to
Loved it! If only it were true
This post was edited on 6/29/26 at 10:01 pm
Posted by stuntman
Florida
Member since Jan 2013
11031 posts
Posted on 6/29/26 at 10:10 pm to
quote:

He is an extremely infamous filmmaker largely known as one of the worst filmmakers of all time. He’s been around a very long time. Most of his films are tax scams


Hold up now. How does this work? Asking for a friend.
Posted by bamadontcare
Member since Jun 2013
4109 posts
Posted on 6/29/26 at 10:21 pm to
quote:

I saw it for free so I guess I was spared.


They can’t help themselves

They are seething
Posted by March1st
Member since Mar 2022
361 posts
Posted on 6/29/26 at 10:22 pm to
Seems several are posting about a movie they've not seen. I understand their motive.

They seem rather unnerved.

So I will bump the post which gives a link on X.

There's no cost, so no profit or grift.

Now you communist can get back to complaining about Government fraud committed by our recent guest.

Obviously sarcasm.
Posted by theballguy
HSV (Dealing only in satire)
Member since Oct 2011
38822 posts
Posted on 6/29/26 at 10:32 pm to
quote:

…..perhaps.
Posted by Srbtiger06
Member since Apr 2006
29356 posts
Posted on 6/29/26 at 10:46 pm to
quote:

fictional movie that has some modicum of truth about mass illegal immigration being a net negative to Western civilization is a grift? Interesting.


It's revenge porn and outrage bait. The entire premise is "I don't like this, I will kill you."

It's a 90 minute version of watching the Gary Plauche video. There is no character development. There is no story. There is nothing other than "there are bad people, let me kill them and show you."

In the last person that's gonna defend pretentious "high art" but this is a notch above A Serbian Film.

Not saying some of the scenarios aren't rooted in reality but this whole movie is stream of consciousness "if that was me I'd kill that MF."
This post was edited on 6/29/26 at 10:48 pm
Posted by bamadontcare
Member since Jun 2013
4109 posts
Posted on 6/29/26 at 10:52 pm to
quote:

Not saying some of the scenarios aren't rooted in reality


LOL
Posted by Lou the Jew from LSU
Member since Oct 2006
5468 posts
Posted on 6/29/26 at 11:02 pm to
quote:

The entire premise is "I don't like this, I will kill you."


Sounds like the spaghetti westerns of my era. Can’t wait to see it.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
479602 posts
Posted on 6/29/26 at 11:07 pm to
quote:

Seems several are posting about a movie they've not seen. I understand their motive.

They seem rather unnerved.

So I will bump the post which gives a link on X.

There's no cost, so no profit or grift.

Now you communist can get back to complaining about Government fraud committed by our recent guest.

Obviously sarcasm.


A few of his movies:

House of the Dead: 3% on RT
Bloodrayne: 4% on RT
In the Name of the King: 4% on RT
Bloodrayne 2: 0% on RT
Postal: 9% on RT

Here is a quote from a review of ITNOTK: "Featuring mostly wooden performances, laughable dialogue, and shoddy production values, In the Name of the King fulfills all expectations of an Uwe Boll film."

It's not just reviews. His movies lose unfathomable amounts of money.

Far Cry
Budget $30 million
Box office $743,634

Bloodrayne:
Budget $25 million[2]
Box office $3.7 million

In the Name of the King:
Budget $60 million[1]
Box office $13.1 million
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram